[Debate] Should Intelligent Design Be Thought In Schools?
- Thread starter Ultimate Badass
- Start date
... sure, and why dont we stop producing electricity, shut down the web, burn scientific books ang go shoot James Watt at his grave before he starts the industrial revolution while were at it ...
Last edited:
Yes, actually these are good arguements my friend, it's like putting kids under pressure to learn something when they can't even add and subtract.omg this is some ppls argument why not to put intelligent design in schools
there are far better arguments why not to do it!
I agree, but most of them may not want to type out a concise reason as to why.omg this is some ppls argument why not to put intelligent design in schools
there are far better arguments why not to do it!
noone in my class had much trouble with mathematics, well except one, and most of us did well with evolution and the rest passed it as well
as for the argument, how about: NO, because only like 200M still believe in an intelligent design around the world, it is a religious belief without any evidence and a institution of knowledge cant teach something that is based on a religious belief of a minority
or
no because it has no scientific proof whatsoever and is not open for discussion or change
Amanwithnoplan
Active member
Can we also teach them that the Sun goes around the Earth? Cause that also has no evidence for it. Evolution has piles of evidence, and Intelligent design has none. It has no business anywhere near a science classroom.
Ok,I read it up on Wikipedia and I say heck no.
However,it is essential to impress on children that the evidence and principles of science are by no means set it in stone.They are constantly evolving as our knowledge and understanding increase.
Still,I have,since I first heard of the concept,believed that the idea of all specializations being chance mutations is highly ludicrous,and is unable to account for complexity and high degree of specialisation of the biological world.
This is now supported by the epigenome concept.
However,it is essential to impress on children that the evidence and principles of science are by no means set it in stone.They are constantly evolving as our knowledge and understanding increase.
Still,I have,since I first heard of the concept,believed that the idea of all specializations being chance mutations is highly ludicrous,and is unable to account for complexity and high degree of specialisation of the biological world.
This is now supported by the epigenome concept.
Why dont we add lessons of Reincarnation, Flat Earth etc in schools too . . . they too have evidences.
/Sarcasm
Evolution has evidences not proof as none has lived for a few thousand years after Darwin. So if there is any proof it will take some time to gather the support or totally overthrow the Theory of evolution.
The Dalai Lama is always reincarnated and he is chosen when a child can speak about details of his supposed past life.
Evolution has evidences not proof as none has lived for a few thousand years after Darwin. So if there is any proof it will take some time to gather the support or totally overthrow the Theory of evolution.
Last edited:
look dude,
i leave my home at for school 7 AM and come home to 7 PM. (i get one hour time to relax in between)
Education in India is Pathetic, Here teachers don't know how to teach properly, and education is just a businessmen,
All my classmates are burdened with studies and so am I, you may have not reached high school level, because if you reach it , you will know how tough it gets...
And along side, it also gets interesting
And we enjoy learning new difficult stuff, actually i am the only one to enjoy it...
Honestly , i don't think increasing course in studies would do any help.
And with constantly improving technology, the education levels are increasing day by day,
10 years ago , kids were not taught, what we are taught right now,
and this will be the same for next generation...
the day will comes soon when a normal child of 10 years could do math calculations, what a 15 year old do...!
i leave my home at for school 7 AM and come home to 7 PM. (i get one hour time to relax in between)
Education in India is Pathetic, Here teachers don't know how to teach properly, and education is just a businessmen,
All my classmates are burdened with studies and so am I, you may have not reached high school level, because if you reach it , you will know how tough it gets...
And along side, it also gets interesting
And we enjoy learning new difficult stuff, actually i am the only one to enjoy it...
Honestly , i don't think increasing course in studies would do any help.
And with constantly improving technology, the education levels are increasing day by day,
10 years ago , kids were not taught, what we are taught right now,
and this will be the same for next generation...
the day will comes soon when a normal child of 10 years could do math calculations, what a 15 year old do...!
ShishaMastah420
Active member
Thought? No No...
Taught...
Technically it is already taught in school, if your learning what your supposed to in school; The skills you have acquired should enable you to understand Intelligent Design....
Intelligent Design as a subject in a whole cannot be taught in schools due to lack of substantial information on the subject...
Taught...
Technically it is already taught in school, if your learning what your supposed to in school; The skills you have acquired should enable you to understand Intelligent Design....
Intelligent Design as a subject in a whole cannot be taught in schools due to lack of substantial information on the subject...
Shinobi Train
Active member
Awards
I think it should be thought...I also think it should be taught too. In fact, we should throw out evolution because there's no scientific proof for it and put something in that does have proof for those with eyes. xd
In fact, we should throw out evolution because there's no scientific proof for it and put something in that does have proof for those with eyes. xdevolution has much evidenceI think it should be thought...I also think it should be taught too.
intelligent design has 0 evidence
... fact