Tennis Anyone???
- Thread starter sharmd
- Start date
RoguePatriot
Active member
I do.
I've been a Nadal fan since I started following in 2005 and recently I've developed a lot more respect for Roger, he's no longer the most gifted player on tour and is handling himself with as much class as he did when he was. Who are you favorites?
I've been a Nadal fan since I started following in 2005 and recently I've developed a lot more respect for Roger, he's no longer the most gifted player on tour and is handling himself with as much class as he did when he was. Who are you favorites?
saaaaaadpanda
Active member
My favorites are Nadal and Roger man. And for women its Serena and Nadia Petrova. What I really don't understand is where the **** did Djokovic come from. He raised so quicly in the past few years from the shittiest player to the top one.:shrug:
blazekev90
Active member
ItachiSan03
Active member
Tried it and sucked at it xd favorite player is djokovic though (i think thats how you spell it).
Killer Vision
Active member
Awards
i played lawn since i was 11.xd
my favorite player is Nadal...in the womens its sharapova
i was a big Agassi fan.
he crash the party of both federrer and nadal who was currently 2 of their own class.
my favorite player is Nadal...in the womens its sharapova
i was a big Agassi fan.
Djokovic was always a solid potential and he had he's break out season last year.
he crash the party of both federrer and nadal who was currently 2 of their own class.
Last edited:
Uchiha seeker
Active member
Awards
NarutoFactoid
Member
If i had to actually pick a favorite i would pick nadal. The years when Federer was getting all the praise and nadal wasn't there yet but was about to rise up. I liked that he was a lefty and i liked his attitude as a young player. As in he was young and so what, i'm here and i want to win.
Every time there was a match up between him and federer in a finals match. And he started to dominate them all. Federer was just thinking to himself, **** i'm not keeping up.
Real shame about his injuries cause this whole djokavic scenario could have been an entirely different story. There was a gap to fill and djokavic slipped into it in tennis history. But thats the way it is in sports. Theres no mercy for the injuries. Anyway. Bit more info then asked.
Every time there was a match up between him and federer in a finals match. And he started to dominate them all. Federer was just thinking to himself, **** i'm not keeping up.
Real shame about his injuries cause this whole djokavic scenario could have been an entirely different story. There was a gap to fill and djokavic slipped into it in tennis history. But thats the way it is in sports. Theres no mercy for the injuries. Anyway. Bit more info then asked.
Escorpiius
Active member
Awards
Djokovic was always a strong contender. He lacked a definite style (like Nadal/Federer) and some more experience.
Nadal rely wonderfully on endurance, strength and special shots with his left hand. A style so wonderfully suited on soil.
Federer is wonderful in placing the ball and with his swift shots. Perfect on grass.
Djokovic always played well but with no distinctive style. He still don't have one but to compensate, he progressed in all sectors. He's an all-rounder and can cope in any style. He worked hard for that and his success to the top is mainly because he can challenge anyone with any style on any field. He still got his flaws but he's good.
I'm a Nadal fan though and no, I don't play tennis but have been an good watcher since 2004.
