FreeMySoul
Member
Re: Somebody Explain Why Hiruzen>Hashirama
if hiruzen couldnt beat orichimaru then how could he beat hashi ....THATS IMPOSSIBLE
if hiruzen couldnt beat orichimaru then how could he beat hashi ....THATS IMPOSSIBLE
It says it in the manga therefore it's true, it doesn't matter how it may look that's what kishi wrote and he is the author lol it's silly and retarded to even argue it xdYeah its this thread again...
People is using the scenario from the part one of Naruto to "prove" that Hiruzen was stronger than Hashi.
In my opinion this is the wrong way to see it on because at this time Kishi clearly didn't think about having Hashirama as the how strong he have had hype about in the part two.
So if someone could tell me how Hiruzen could possibly beat Hashirama with the part two hype then be my guest :shrug:
databook said the kusanagi blade can cut anything, the 2nd hokage was known as the greatest suiton user just because he could create water from his mouth, and water dragon jutsu takes 40 hand seals, hell we didn't even know any of the other hokage's names back in part 1. Recons happen people, the databooks simply tell you the current known data in the series when they were written. As far as we knew back then, Hiruzen was the strongest hokage, but we learn more and parts of the story change.
Hiruzen wasn't even in his prime when he fought oro and your argument proves nothing.if hiruzen couldnt beat orichimaru then how could he beat hashi ....THATS IMPOSSIBLE
OK guys you win Hiruzen>Hashi>Madara because he was called god of shinobi wasn't he and that means all shinobi. He is not even a senju or and uchiha but it doesn't matter he is right under the so6p's because fodders said so. Fodders who call the so6p him self a myth. And hashi's powers a myth. You win guys.
He beat Orochimaru.if hiruzen couldnt beat orichimaru then how could he beat hashi ....THATS IMPOSSIBLE
How can you say Hiruzen has shown you nothing when Old-Hiruzen beat Prime Hashi? I think you didn't watch or read Naruto Part 1.Why can't people accept the word "change"
In the beginning Hiruzen was noted as the strongest Hokage, just like Itachi was noted as a bad guy. Just because Kishi stated Hiruzen>Hashiram 7-8 years ago, that doesn't mean that now.Just like Itachi,Kishi never stated Itachi was an good guy,but we can infer that he is. Let's look at some feats
Hashirama
-Wood Style
-Can Heal W/O handseals
-Suppress Tailed Beast Chakra
-Skilled in all category's
-Madara praises him for his power
-His Power Was a Myth
Hiruzen
-???
-???
-???
-???
Hiruzen has shown me nothing. Look how badass Madara's Sasuno was.HTF could Hiruzen fight anything like.The only person who could fight that is Tobi,Hashirama,and Naruto.
Who agrees with me?
Just trhowing this out there
I'd like to know what can Hiruzen do besides pray and die against something colossal like thatYou must be registered for see images
they said in part 1 it took 40 hand seals to use water dragon jutsu, and it was considered a godly feat to use suiton without water nearby, etc. My point is not everything in part 1 should be taken at face value. Kishi doesn't need to make a direct statement for me to reasonably assume certain things have been retconned. Because if I don't then I'd have assume every suiton user we've seen in part 2 is at kage level skill, for example.
The entire cut anything part was a legend.. made my ninjas... the legend of the sword was that it could cut anything..
The rest of what you posted made 0 sense
they said in part 1 it took 40 hand seals to use water dragon jutsu, and it was considered a godly feat to use suiton without water nearby, etc. My point is not everything in part 1 should be taken at face value. Kishi doesn't need to make a direct statement for me to reasonably assume certain things have been retconned. Because if I don't then I'd have assume every suiton
Urm you do realize there was an severe increase in powerlevels in part 1 compared to part 2?
That doesn't change anything of what happened however.... It just means that if the fight happened in part 2, it would have been on a much bigger scale... simple..
It was not them who called him the strongest it was the fodders!!!!!!!!!
aww how cute, He thinks that having senju or uchiha dna makes you win every battle
tsunade and naruto would disagree
Also, how idiotic of you.. the people who would conisder hashirama's powers a myth, would be people who never saw him or it before... aka people of this current gen..
People in hiruzen's gen would have known both hashirama and tobirama, since his death was only like 9+ years ago... And yet they still proclaimed him strongest hokage
It was not them who called him the strongest it was the fodders!!!!!!!!!
A smart guy like danzo goes for the 1st dna because he knows how strong he is and this dna. He also wanted his powers to control the tailed beast.
Around Naruto getting SM.do u know when 3rd DB was released?
oh, owarij for cover right?![]()
Still rollin' with this shitty theory, I see.hashiramas strength was a myth so people didnt believe in his power. they then reasoned that hiruzen was the strongest.
Kakashi said the sage of six paths is a myth, lets believe him he did not exist and was not this strong.
danzo went for the firsts dna to lengthen iznanagi and control tailed beasts.. In no way is that an indication of hashi's power... He has a usefull KKG...
I love who you like making stuff up to try and fit your idiotic argument...
Yea nameless fodders who consisted of the entire village at that time.. people like kakashi's father etc... who would have lived to know tobirama and hashirama..
All the people of the village still said Hiruzen was stronger... That my friend , Logically > anything you can ever come up with.. I'd take their opinion of your bs anyday.
Just like when the sunugakure elders say the third kazekage was stronger , I believe them, because they were they , and know what they are talking about..
So if a village, after seeing all former hokages power, still says hiruzen was stronger to this day.. He's stronger