- Joined
- Oct 3, 2011
- Messages
- 13,322
- Reaction score
- 990
No where in there are they referred to as spiritual or non-physical. Yata mirror is said to have no physical form which just means that while it's technically physical it's not bound to any shape, similar to any liquid (although it's obviously not a giant water shield lol).
That really didn't get your point across to me - keep in mind I'm not trying to be rude I just want to make it clear that these objects are present in the physical world and while they most likely instantly repair themselves or reform from broken pieces they are physical and can be damaged.
EDIT: Just examined the second post carefully to make sure I was right on this and it seems I am. It says they have no physical form, not that they are not physical. There is a huge distinction, this is like comparing water, which has no physical form and molds to its container, and a ghost - which is a spirit, whether or not they're real doesn't play a part in this argument though. It's absurd to say they have no physical presence.
Look in the second dictionary, you see "Spirit weapon" , weapons that have no phyiscal form.. . according to kishi there isn't any 70% spiritual, 30 % physical..
he said know physical form
You must be registered for see images
Both yata, and totsuka are spirit weapons, at the top you see " it has Spirit weapons in both hands.."
The thing here is you just don't know how spirit weapons work.. There are things kishi never explained... like how sasori could live with just a heart , n o brain , etc... how he could hear, all those things...
he never explained spirit weapons, but he clearly stated that they have 0 physical form, and have magical powers,
No where in there are they referred to as spiritual or non-physical. Yata mirror is said to have no physical form which just means that while it's technically physical it's not bound to any shape, similar to any liquid (although it's obviously not a giant water shield lol).
That really didn't get your point across to me - keep in mind I'm not trying to be rude I just want to make it clear that these objects are present in the physical world and while they most likely instantly repair themselves or reform from broken pieces they are physical and can be damaged.
EDIT: Just examined the second post carefully to make sure I was right on this and it seems I am. It says they have no physical form, not that they are not physical. There is a huge distinction, this is like comparing water, which has no physical form and molds to its container, and a ghost - which is a spirit, whether or not they're real doesn't play a part in this argument though. It's absurd to say they have no physical presence.
To be very, very clear -
If it had no physical presence, in other words it wasn't a physical object, it would have been stated as not being physical at all.
If it's described as having no physical form, it means that it simply has no true shape but changes under certain circumstances.
Sigh i have an exam tommorow, and i need to get some rest t.t , i'll bookmark and continue this tmrw
Last edited by a moderator: