- Joined
- Apr 21, 2011
- Messages
- 59,557
- Reaction score
- 4,729
A lot of people, when comparing characters, compare feats. Well I'd like to ask, what the hell does that have to do with ANYTHING?!
For example, in Sakura vs Hinata, people argue about feats and in that thread over in the popular section thing about Hashirama he says Hashirama isn't in top five due to NO FEATS, despite multiple characters saying his power was on a whole other level.
How does that determine anything? By that logic, Konohamaru is stronger than Asuma since he took down a Pein body for a while and Asuma hasn't really had feats. But we know that's not true,so why do people use feats as an argument? Shouldn't we compare actual strength instead?
For example, in Sakura vs Hinata, people argue about feats and in that thread over in the popular section thing about Hashirama he says Hashirama isn't in top five due to NO FEATS, despite multiple characters saying his power was on a whole other level.
How does that determine anything? By that logic, Konohamaru is stronger than Asuma since he took down a Pein body for a while and Asuma hasn't really had feats. But we know that's not true,so why do people use feats as an argument? Shouldn't we compare actual strength instead?