- Joined
- Sep 9, 2010
- Messages
- 1,161
- Reaction score
- 45
are you corrupted and also i bet you think since orochimaru smart he used the first and second well against the third.
so you really think someone controlling you is better than using an experience user who knows his own abilties the best.
what happened in the manga shishu genjutsu which saved itachi and it took 3 srank ninja to take down a controlled edo tensa rinnegan user.
the last time i checked it took tailed beast bomb super powered rasen shuriken and itachi own long range tech of susanno to stop chikabi tensa.
as much as you want to say that a 3vs1 macth shows itachi is better than nagato, it's not a good way to support itachi.
lol:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
Laugh it up. You need to read what I say before assuming shit. No, I don't think it's better if someone is controlling someone else UNLESS that someone who is controlling you is 3x smarter than you. In Nagato's case, Kabuto is beyond his intellectual level so yes, Kabuto is the better candidate to fight vs. Itachi. 2nd: Nagato has little to no experience fighting in his own body with all 6 realms. He was synced with Gedo long ago when he fought Hanzo. Have you seen his fight with Naruto? He had a tough time keeping up with Sage Mode Naruto in the 6 Paths mode. Kabuto knew what he was doing, he used Nagato and managed to capture both Naruto and Bee. Itachi is the one who defeated Nagato.
It wasn't 3 vs 1. Naruto and Bee were clearly deadweights. Itachi did the beating, he found Nagato's Rinnegan's weakness (for those who are saying Rinnegan is the ultimate Dojutsu, rofl), he found Chibaku Tensei's weakness and he could have very well destroyed it himself as it was obvious that he was confident in his ability to beat it.
Keep using that "3 vs. 1" excuse, it amuses me. Facts will remain facts.
