Hard to argue against that. Well put Bunny. Your posts are nice to read ( yep I stalk you to read them- sometimes*pulls in fishing line* Ladies and gentlemen...we got him!
I can't believe he actually fell for it xd
Lmao xd
1)
In the version you wrote about the events you completely ignored 90% of the story. You didn't mention anything of your first ban nor that you first wasted my time for hours nor that you stalked the entire staff. In your version of the story it seemed you went directly to Rei and that she just banned you without reason. You just completely ignored most of what happened and then you say to me that I only use the things that work in my favour? On top of that it isn't even true, what did I not mention then? I posted the entire convo's I had with two of your accounts and even the PM were I so called "insulted you". The only PM's I didn't post were the once were I was helping you and I have a suspicion that those wouldn't really work against me...
2)
Talking about ourself in the third person singular are weand do I need to deduct from that that you're not human? *hears a faint echo of a God-complex*
3)
No, I never would have guessed WTH from Naruto of all manga's...
4)
Yeah, I couldn't agree more. Why do you think we banned you? Trolls are baaaaaaaaaaaaad.
5)
LMFAO _O- I advice you to read that sentence I couple of times as that's the vision of a child. Also having morality lessons of a guy who only is flaming people in this thread doesn't really have much value.
6)
This was posted on my VM wall. As I recall didn't you made a thread where you kamasutrad (is that a word?) my mother? And where you threatened to smash Rei's teeth out?
Tell me something where o where was I wrong in my post? Did you read it completely? Tell me something you wrote your version of the story, so why couldn't me and the staff wrote our version of the story? The only differences between my version and your version are:
1) My was rational supported by strong, logical arguments. Yours was not, flaming the staff/innocent members does not count as a rational argument.
2) It didn't contain any foul language. I implied a lot of things, however according to your logic if it doesn't contain foul language, it is not an insult. But I forget, that only counts if you say it. Or am I wrong in saying that you said that both Scarface and I insulted you? He with his comment on the infraction and I in the PM provided in my first post. None of those contained any foul language, still you say it was insulting to you, but your PM to Scar wasn't. My post didn't contain any foul language, I can't say the same of your threads and posts.
You have been flaming innocent members and have been spamming this thread just because they don't support you (this is already weak, we didn't ban nor punished the persons who were supporting you in your thread, now did we), but tell me were are your arguments? For all your insults and spam you didn't provide a single argument that could prove your innocence. In fact all the actions you took clearly prove I, and the staff, were right in our actions. Saying that we're wrong, but you can't say why is pretty useless, don't you think so? If you can't get further than "they only used PM's that are in their favour" without any kind of proof -not to mention it isn't true- while you yourself didn't mention most of the story just confirms who was right and who was wrong.
Instead of flaming, maybe you should try make a rational argument, you know like an adult. Just a small suggestion.
)Unfortunately it shows that IP ban is not that effective.U_U
Last edited:
