love and kind words can make you weak.
i shouldnt have to explain that simple truth.
if you dont know that the door always swings both ways, then maybe you will in time.
love can make you weak and/or stronger
and hate can too. hate has made sasuke strong, susanoo is strength.
but in his heart he is weak. he is blinded by his hate. he cant see the harm he is doing.
love has made naruto strong, but he still has weaknesses, he will sacrifice his life for sasuke, if need be. he would give up his life for an undeserving, evil nutwad(sasuke)
he loves yamato and his friends so much, that he just believes them without wondering for himself why the hell the world just turned upside down. trust can be a weakness, even though its foundation is love.
dont think that love is this all powerful, unbeatable force.
i would say that it is the most amazing thing that there is, and its the key to happiness and everything else, but it does not make us invulnerable, impermeable, and super strong at all times. sometimes the higher you go, the more unsteady you are.
sometimes the further you go, the more lost you become. sometimes caring too much is a bad thing. there is a rule called moderation. if you dont know about it, look it up. because it governs everything. nothing is exempt from the rule of moderation.
like i said, the door can always swing both ways, it just depends on the individual and the situation. good and bad? thats just words we use after the fact. they are just opinions of those left around to judge the outcome.
and anything is not possible.
naruto is not possibly sasuke....
kakashi is not possibly a bad ninja.
jiraiya is not possibly not dead.
etc etc
so dont go thinking that nothing is certain, because if anything is certain (and it is) then it is that though there is uncertainty in the world and in fantasy, we have to have somewhere to stand, if we want to take in the sights. (i.e. a solid belief structure from which we can understand and interpret our world.) fantasy or real.
and itachi did not show sasuke much love. as kids maybe he did ( and really not even then, he was constantly ignoring sasuke) (lord cant blame him, he had his own friggin problems, right?), but certainly he did not show sasuke any love during or after that horrible night.
he loved sasuke, yes, thats why he spared him, and why he freed him from orochimaru, but there is a difference between having love for someone, and giving love to that person.
he didnt hug sasuke and tell him everything was gonna be alright.
he didnt team up with him and teach him how to control his sharingan.
he kicked him in the gut, punched him the face, and he shot ameratsu at him...
and why??
he purposefully led sasuke into hating him.
if he loved sasuke sooooo much, than why would he force him to have so much hate in his life? hate for his own brother? thats just sick man. maybe he did the right thing in the end, but there are some serious issues there, that have nothing to do with love. what impression did sasuke have the whole time? (itachi hates me, I hate itachi)
whether itachi had love for sasuke or not, sasuke didnt see it that way until it was way too late. the hatred had already forced him into killing his own brother.
and not to mention opening him up to madara's coercion and leading him down the path of evil. death and dismay get no one, no where.
and as for kabuto, im not sure why you are hung up on what he had at the beginning.
he was a super smart medical ninja at the beginning.
who fooled everyone around into thinking he was a student, like them.
and he was orochimarus right hand man... why wont you give him some credit?
if he sucked at life, would orochimaru even have bothered letting him live and be so close to him? no, he woulda thrown kabuto in that dungeon with the rest of the trash.
he didnt because he knew, like you should know, that kabuto is awesome.
do you hate him that much, that you cant see what an amazing ninja that kabuto
a. has been
b. still is
c. will always be
??
I want to throw a challenge out to all the guests reading this thread.
Create a login and converse with us. We could use some fresh input.
I'd like to hear what some of you think of our conversations, and what you think of this episode and whats to come.
The door always swings both ways because we've been conditioned to believe it swings both ways, when in reality there is no door at all. What some perceive as "weakness," others might deem "strength." If one loves extravagantly, are they strongly weak or weakly strong? Conversely, if one hates profusely, is their mistrust of humanity their greatest weakness (or strength) in that it allows for no love to diffuse inside their organisms? Is love not the hate of hate, and hate the hate of love? Or, could it be that love is the love of love, and hate is the hate of hate?
Just the same, is trust a weakness, or is doubt a weakness? Is the one who believes firmly weak, or the one who denies such? It's all about perception, when one gets to the base of it all. And that's why nothing is certain, and that's why nothing is real. Are the things we perceive the only things we can see? Is the screen you're looking through an accurate portrayal of the world, or is it all illusory like everybody else's? Do we not give meaning to all things because we desire them to stand for something rather than just themselves, which can be anything at all? You are correct, that we do have to stand somewhere and take in the sights, yet the sights are influenced by the way we view the world before us, and are not necessarily the things we are seeing. Is a tree you see on a street the actual tree, or simply your perception of it? "True reality lies beyond the senses," as said by Plato. We need somewhere to stand, yet that area at which we stand is created by us, is given meaning by us, by which we may project our own idealizations and outlooks on "life." And if it is not created by us, where does one stand?
There is a rule called moderation, according to you. Nothing is exempt from it; well, is moderation exempt from moderation? What is moderation? Is moderation, actually, not polarizing towards one side of the spectrum or another (moderating to one extreme or another)? Because it cannot be that one does two things both at the same time; "save while spending." Your personal inclinations will always carry you toward one side of the threshold or the other. That's why there exists nothing such as moderation. You can search and search, but you'll never find the middle ground, because the "middle ground" is layered with subtle appeals (personal inclinations) toward one part of a problem or argument or another. At that point, it ceases to be the middle ground because objectivity is eliminated (and perception, which fuels bias, cannot be removed), and once again we are on a different path entirely. Bringing back the example of "saving while spending," yes, one might actually be able to do this, but their emotions betray them and say "you know you like to spend more than save (or vice versa) and are just trying to convince yourself otherwise, doing it because you want to impress others, but most of all, impress yourself by seeing that you can actually manage this." Yet it is futile.
To me that becomes denial, no longer the middle ground, which in and of itself could be denial - I will take the middle ground because I cannot convince myself one way or another, and will sit on the fence indefinitely pondering about what might or could have been. However, don't confuse this with an investment, for example; an investment is knowingly carried out by a person, and is separate from denial, introducing the concept that the person does indeed want to give money to benefit later in the long run. Not lying to oneself.
"Anything is not possible" because you think it so. Any other person might stand up and say "anything is possible." Who is right? Can anyone truly be correct, considering perception (viewpoint on something) ignites bias, which immolates the circular arguments of the semantics of proof and faith, essentially getting nowhere when you consider it?
It could be that Itachi hated his love for Sasuke, because it was the one thing that prevented him from completing his mission, forcing him to live such a life of anguish (dying at his very brother's hand) instead of killing Sasuke then and there and later succumbing with no second thoughts of the blood of his brother on his self. He purposefully led Sasuke into loving his hate for him, making them polar opposites that were eventually joined by the factor of a powerful truth. But, as they say, opposites attract, and as we've seen between these two brothers, that has clearly been the case. And hate was not what opened Sasuke up to Madara's coercion; it was love - his love for his brother pushed him beyond limits he never knew existed. Yet the love, interchangeably enough, became the love for hate and the hate for love once more; hatefully loving Itachi's ordered slaughter of the clan (losing his family despite it being done for the greater good), while also lovingly hating the complacency others experience, that Sasuke could have had himself. He desires that better future, tries to do whatever is in his power to attain it, yet knows it will never come back. "Bring me back Itachi...bring me back my clan! Then I will stop!" He wants it, doesn't he? Yet want is sometimes not realized.
Last edited: