So, few things
My issue was never purely the concept of Mafia Theory. Not at all, actually. My issue has always been how you have applied it. To conflate these two positions is a fallacy known as a strawman argument. My reason for knowing this is quite important, because it's what will help me to determine your thought process, and which alignment it makes the most sense for. It would also help demonstrate your logical ability.
Number 2. You complained about my reads, and my impression was you thought I was too quick to come to them. Yet here you openly admit that gut plays a large role in Day 1 reads. Can you reconcile this for me?
Your answer above that is satisfactory so I'm not going to press that further.
By you informing as to what exactly it is you're looking for, you are providing a standard from which you can be judged. As an example in this specific case, if you were to simply use what we seem to have established as playstyle conflicts as justification for a scum read, and even try to push that, then that would be an example of you pushing for a lynch as opposed to trying to figure out my alignment. Alternatively if you are clearly making an attempt to filter out the false positives that can arrive from a style of play you do not agree with, then that would be a good look. But it's important that this is clear, because by getting you to commit to a standard now, in the hypothetical that you are scum, it reduces the room you have to argue against me later in the game should this be revisited. And the good thing here is that if you're town, you should have no issue meeting those standards, because as town you have a clear interest in doing so. Does that explain it okay?
