There is no mention who you guys sub for.dude, read SK's posts
dude, read SK's posts (sageBee and Nosferatu)
There is no mention who you guys sub for.dude, read SK's posts
dude, read SK's posts (sageBee and Nosferatu)
There is no mention who you guys sub for.
.....@Morte_Nosferatu has been subbed out and @mothbomb will take his place.
@Sagebee has been subbed out due to not meeting the requirement and being inactive @Mendel has taken his place.
There is no mention who you guys sub for.
read better@Morte_Nosferatu has been subbed out and @mothbomb will take his place.
@Sagebee has been subbed out due to not meeting the requirement and being inactive @Mendel has taken his place.
Okay, actually I didn't read the NP WU, I thought he was talking about this DP WU. MY bad.....
I said that cuz this is the first time I'm seeing people mentioning post numbers but not quoting them. So yeah it was kinda different for meConcerning Houtarou, I think I may need to look at that again then, though using post numbers instead of quoting is something I have been complained at for.
if you want to get content and informaton, ask players for explanations! ask for INFORMATION!There is a good reason for why you didn't see me push anyone Mendel: it's because I had literally nothing I was confident on and searched for Town instead, rather than Mafia. My goal on Day 1 is more to create content (to read players with) and information (through flips and votes).
Concerning Houtarou, I think I may need to look at that again then, though using post numbers instead of quoting is something I have been complained at for.
I didn't answer you properly on the Mafia placement thing, sorry. Basically: I tend to go by the minimum amount of scum around since in a setup like this there is possibly more than one third party role, which tends to impact Mafia numbers. Setup repeats at Mafia Colosseum tend to follow different Town/scum ratios as a result (ex: Easter Mafia changing from 4 scum to 3 scum and an SK.) In regards to why I use my methods, I just know that it works for me and helps get my own thoughts in order, even if it doesn't benefit anyone else. I find this hard to explain, tbh.
Okay, is that bad idea voting for a person who voted for you at the moment which appears to opportunistic, something that looks like trying to take the profit from the current climate can be considered scummy or come from terribly bad reasoning. Like you said we have to vote for scummier target, so why not? Odd appears to be scummy with his vote on me like he wanted an opportunity. I think you know better than that what OMGUS word is for or when it used? Right?@Houtarou oreki Luffy (which name do you prefer?)
I do not understand your idea of defense. Odd attacks you with a case on D1. You attack him back half-heartedly and then do trash talking (and similarly with Clestial later). You don't seem like a newb, you seem like someone who knows how to push people and to get reactions, and read them. You must surely realize that if the player voting is scum, it doesn't matter what you do. If the player voting you is town, a counterattack (I am calling it OMGUS for "oh my god U sock") will do nothing because they know they are town. If they are town, you need to find them a better, scummier target to vote for, you need to hunt scum. Instead, you are fluffing up the thread with useless trash talking. Is that just a bad habit of yours, or is there some method to it that I do not understand? Please explain.
It wasn't really much reasoning, I voted him cuz he didn't care about any argument. He only said about others argument "it's interesting" but he never takes part in the big discussion, that's a type of players usually just want a lynch to leadWhat was houtaros reasoning for the rej lynch. that was the lead voter on that wagon.
ok good to know but what made you say that??AL SAMA, hi. youre town. congratulations