Info Wars Banned

[Punk Hazard]

Then the rules should apply the same way to everyone else.

We're pretending they don't?

 

[Onii Chan]

Never said anything about him going underground and whatnot. I still don't even know what kind of punishment he received. I merely expressed my delight in that he finally seems to receive some form of punishment considering he has been making a living for years by being a chronic liar without any repercussions. Freedom of speech doesn't mean and never meant you automatically can say whatever you want indefinitely and without repercussions.

And you do realize the value of your entire monologue here about America is absolute zero? It has no meaning, it's completely hollow, it's void of any substance. Like a wannabe magic spell you just cast some words and terms and concepts you know will have an effect on people and then you just repeat them till they buy it. "lefties", "radical islam", "home of the free", "silent majority", "true patriots", "white supremacy", "first amendment", "free speech", "American values" etc. There's no cohesion whatsoever.

The only ones who buy this nonsense rhetoric are people who are incredibly naive, susceptible and thus very prone to being brainwashed. Almost like they are trained to react on reflex if they hear a specific word. It's a vicious cycle: people like Alex Jones make up the most ridiculous stuff, present them as facts and then people who already lean towards those same ideas use that as confirmation of what they already thought and start to support Jones. Jones then sees that support as confirmation for the stuff he made up and then the cycle repeats itself. That's cancerous for a society as you then have a bunch of people with controversial and even dangerous beliefs that are based on nothing. That's a recipe for disaster. That suddenly his app is downloaded massively was a predictable outcome, but doesn't really mean anything as most of those people were probably already stuck in that cycle.

Do you know what the biggest irony of this all is? If anything he said was actually true, he would have never been able to say it in the first place. You should have tried living in East-Germany during the Cold War. Now they were brutally efficient in putting people with big mouths down.

Also first "righteous republican party" and now "silencing the silent majority? Seriously?

Yes it does mean you can say anything, i don't believe sam hyde was immediately arrested for making holocaust and african jokes in legit public view. Are you even american? If you were then you'd somehow realize that i can walk down the street and yell the n word and nothing will happen to me law wise which were talking about. My mouth and anything i say isn't against the law of america, please show me a SINGLE law that states that i cannot say or express a specific value or essence, you cant, because their no laws against words in america. You come up and spew random intellectual words and proceed to say ''your statement means nothing'', you sound like a pseudo scientist like bill nye trying to tell me the biology behind monkeys. Ego, and self centerness is all i see from that whole thing, all because you said it has no substance doesn't mean it doesn't. You don't see me going around and calling peoples statements invalid do you? A normal individual doesn't go around and calling ideologies they don't agree with invalid and dismiss-able, but leave it to the modern day socialists to throw up some communist like agenda and ideology in a attempt to block out everything they dislike or otherwise make their ears bleed. If you don't like the fact that they're putting atrazine into the water supply to artificially induce homosexuality upon the innocent populace then you're already under the brain control of the government, the white streaks in the air has already gotten to you i'm afraid. Were not '' naive '' or '' brainwashed '' were the obvious resistance, google is spying on you, wake up.

 

[Lightbringer]

Yes it does mean you can say anything, i don't believe sam hyde was immediately arrested for making holocaust and african jokes in legit public view. Are you even american? If you were then you'd somehow realize that i can walk down the street and yell the n word and nothing will happen to me law wise which were talking about. My mouth and anything i say isn't against the law of america, please show me a SINGLE law that states that i cannot say or express a specific value or essence, you cant, because their no laws against words in america. You come up and spew random intellectual words and proceed to say ''your statement means nothing'', you sound like a pseudo scientist like bill nye trying to tell me the biology behind monkeys. Ego, and self centerness is all i see from that whole thing, all because you said it has no substance doesn't mean it doesn't. You don't see me going around and calling peoples statements invalid do you? A normal individual doesn't go around and calling ideologies they don't agree with invalid and dismiss-able, but leave it to the modern day socialists to throw up some communist like agenda and ideology in a attempt to block out everything they dislike or otherwise make their ears bleed. If you don't like the fact that they're putting atrazine into the water supply to artificially induce homosexuality upon the innocent populace then you're already under the brain control of the government, the white streaks in the air has already gotten to you i'm afraid. Were not '' naive '' or '' brainwashed '' were the obvious resistance, google is spying on you, wake up.

He wasn't talking about the law you dimwit. He was talking about how what you say can have repercussions with your work, family, friends, etc.

And when it comes to the law, yes, there are things you can be arrested for. Threats of violence, slander, libel, are some examples.

You just proved his point about being naive and brainwashed.

 

[Multiply]

Alex jones hasn't went underground or has been silenced, his app has sky rocketed in the top 5 charts since the ban and has remained there since then. You cannot silence the silent majority, were the true patriots who'll fight for freedom while you lefties drink your coffee from starbucks in the morning and complain why you don't have enough creamer and blame it on white supremacy. His ban wasn't justified at all, it was a clear attack on the political views before the election, silencing the massive red wave that has grew in displayable value so the small blue sparks can show at least for a little bit. Hate speech? This is america, youtube, google, and apple are american companies, although apple now works for china. This isn't england where they'll kill you in the streets if you approach too close to a military guard, this is the home of the free with a constitution that clearly states upon the first amendment of free speech that anyone is allowed to express political view points or the other as much as possible. Its a clear attack on the american values, its been said before, the liberalism is coming already in the form of socialism and here we are, banning people because of their beliefs. Whats next? Someone says something bad about radical Islam and they get hung in the streets?

TL;DR: Everyone who doesn't like Alex Jones is a leftist.

You must be registered for see images

 

[Onii Chan]

He wasn't talking about the law you dimwit. He was talking about how what you say can have repercussions with your work, family, friends, etc.

And when it comes to the law, yes, there are things you can be arrested for. Threats of violence, slander, libel, are some examples.

You just proved his point about being naive and brainwashed.

If you knew the law then you'd realize the majority of those cases are dismissed.

 

[Fountain]

We're pretending they don't?

They don't. Most of these private companies are left leaning, they have their own political ideologies, wich means there is bound to be bias. That + the collective/tribalistic sjw's operating within those websites, dictating on who should get the hammer is one of the (if not "the") main reason(s) specific people, mainly conservatives get the short end of the stick and they on the other hand get a free pass no matter how much they break the rules, wich they do on a daily basis with all manner of threats and racism, slander etc.

You can look at the Sarah Jeong's case for example. Everyone has heard of it by now. Who made some of the most disgusting, horrible comments against white men i've ever seen and not a single **** was given. But when Cadance Owens used one of her comments but switched the word white men with Jewish she was immediately banned, proving the double standards. There is no secret. This has been happening to regular folk for a while. And is continuing to happen.

 

[Lightbringer]

They don't. Most of these private companies are left leaning, they have their own political ideologies, wich means there is bound to be bias. That + the collective/tribalistic sjw's operating within those websites, dictating on who should get the hammer is one of the (if not "the") main reason(s) specific people, mainly conservatives get the short end of the stick and they on the other hand get a free pass no matter how much they break the rules, wich they do on a daily basis with all manner of threats and racism, slander etc.

You can look at the Sarah Jeong's case for example. Everyone has heard of it by now. Who made some of the most disgusting, horrible comments against white men i've ever seen and not a single **** was given. But when Cadance Owens used one of her comments but switched the word white men with Jewish she was immediately banned, proving the double standards. There is no secret. This has been happening to regular folk for a while. And is continuing to happen.

Welcome to capitalism bitch. It's not a free speech issue.

If there's a left-leaning bias in private corporations, well tough titty. Sovereignty of private industries is literally one of the major platforms of the right.

 

[Yeah right]

Wait. Have we moved back to big business being bad? I thought Trump changed middle America’s mind. You know, since Trump literally is Big Business.

 

[Caliburn]

You don't say. Come on man, he was talking to you, Aristotelian, and the other clown. It was Aristotelian who said the thing about him going underground.



Then the rules should apply the same way to everyone else.



Like when you throw out words like "hate speech", "islamophobia", "racist", "Nazi", "fascist", "alt-right", "white supremacy" left and right as if their magical spells. To silence and attack other people you disagree with. Ammirite?



like you, right? -_- Is it hard to accept that not everybody has to think the same way as you?



Therefore everything is bullshit then? Because everyone says whatever the hell they want? We're not living east-Germany during the cold war. That's the thing.

Then he shouldn't quote my post or clearly state why I got quoted. Instead I get that meaningless BS and I have an extremely strong disdain towards anyone who tries to convince me of something with hollow speeches like that as then they believe I'm stupid enough to actually fall for it.

They already should apply to everyone. That's the freaking point.

I didn't even say any of those words. You just made them all up, except white supremacy, but that was something I myself quoted, so that's redundant. I don't even get how you attempted trying to be shmuck about this when you stand there blatantly lying.

Like me? That doesn't even make any sense. I just condoned that behavior and the best thing you can come up with is "like you"? If you want to play wisecracker, you really need to more concrete as at this point this is like a child that gets insulted and then replies "no you are a xxx". And I have yet to meet a single person who thinks the way I do. In fact it's exactly because of that I understand this very well and here we are back again with what I said in my previous post.

And yes it pretty much is as when the very foundation of your house is non-existent, what can the house do but fall down? Even if by some miracle Jones touches about something truthful, it would be pointless as if you don't understand or don't care for concepts like integrity, objectivism, self-criticism and provenance, it would be all for nought. And yes you don't live in East-Germany, that was exactly the point I was making here. The amount of tolerance and liberty people like Jones receive is ridiculously high and they use that to concoct controversial stories that regularly discredit the instances that provide this tolerant environment. If these stories were actually true, he shouldn't be able to be so freely about it. You like to pretend you're being "silenced" and yadayadayada, but you don't even understand what that means. East Germany and the Cold War are not that long ago.

You bite the proverbial hand that feeds you and then complain it feeds you a little bit less.

So congratulations. Your post didn't do anything whatsoever. You lied, tried to bounce the ball back and proved my points thinking you did the opposite. Might be a bit of a wild guess here, but I reckon at this point you're already trying to put labels on me like I'm supposedly a libtard, a socialist, a fag and things like that. The series of terms you posted seemed to point into that direction. So if you do I really suggest you stop with it because as long as you keep doing that, you're going to have your head smashed against the wall again and again.

Yes it does mean you can say anything, i don't believe sam hyde was immediately arrested for making holocaust and african jokes in legit public view. Are you even american? If you were then you'd somehow realize that i can walk down the street and yell the n word and nothing will happen to me law wise which were talking about. My mouth and anything i say isn't against the law of america, please show me a SINGLE law that states that i cannot say or express a specific value or essence, you cant, because their no laws against words in america. You come up and spew random intellectual words and proceed to say ''your statement means nothing'', you sound like a pseudo scientist like bill nye trying to tell me the biology behind monkeys. Ego, and self centerness is all i see from that whole thing, all because you said it has no substance doesn't mean it doesn't. You don't see me going around and calling peoples statements invalid do you? A normal individual doesn't go around and calling ideologies they don't agree with invalid and dismiss-able, but leave it to the modern day socialists to throw up some communist like agenda and ideology in a attempt to block out everything they dislike or otherwise make their ears bleed. If you don't like the fact that they're putting atrazine into the water supply to artificially induce homosexuality upon the innocent populace then you're already under the brain control of the government, the white streaks in the air has already gotten to you i'm afraid. Were not '' naive '' or '' brainwashed '' were the obvious resistance, google is spying on you, wake up.

No it doesn't. The fact you think it does only reaffirms my previous post that much more. It's a prime example of extreme naivety and also underlines this habit of blurting out terms, but not actually understanding what they mean.

No I'm not an American and I think I'm not the only person on this forum who would react on that with "thank God I'm not". However not being something can be very convenient in certain cases depending on the situation as it allows you to evaluate something from a different perspective. And btw it's not like America is the only country that has freedom of speech, it's just that not all of us get an orgasm when hearing the word 'freedom'.

Now the issue with fundamental rights like freedom of speech, is that they are always explained in an abstract manner so that everyone gets the overall concept. However many of these rights actually can overlap or even conflict with one another. That's why normally in additional legislation it is explained what the limits are and how they correspond with other rights and most importantly how it will function in practice. This can vary from country to country.

To go with your example, you call someone N in public. That person then smashes all your teeth out and breaks every bone in your body. He then replies he used the same right to convey his opinion with his fists. Yeah, you could even justify murder that way. Are you then going to say "I affee *two broken thumbs up*"? You really think that is ok? If not then you admit that it's very well limited. You even pointed it: "law wise". So you succeeded in contradicting your initial statement after two lines. For the record "speech" isn't limited to merely words.

To keep going with this example it's not because it would be allowed in this particular case, that it's allowed in every other case. Context and situation are incredibly important. Also it's not because you get away with it, that therefore it's allowed. Who is going to bother searching for someone who said N once and then ran off. More importantly there's a huge ass difference between saying N in the street once and fabricating and spreading stories via social media that can reach a wide audience about the government poisoning you. These two are not even in the same league.

I don't know much about the American legislative system, though from what I've heard and read, it's far from perfect an plagued by many issues. But even taking that into consideration I can hardly imagine it does not have anything related to murder, beating people within an inch of their life, slander, harassment, treason etc. I also sincerely doubt you know much about this yourself considering you just said "laws against words".

And after that you went along again with either saying irrelevant things or meaningless remarks. I mean which intellectual words? I'm not even a native English speaker. My English is, as far as I'm concerned, basic. Are you now telling me my English is actually of a higher intellectual level than someone who claims to be American?

Yes when you ramble on and jump from one vague thing to another in an inconsistent manner without any explanation, proper context or even showing any understanding of what you just said, you say absolutely nothing. You might as well hear a bee zooming. It makes sounds, but does it mean anything? What you did and still do is a common tactic many politicians and demagogues like to use: trying to hit specific strings so that they easily can connect with their audience without having the need to explain anything. The problem is then that it's unclear how much the orator actually knows and understands. Case and point: you. You blabber on about freedom of speech, but don't even understand it. You go from patriotism, silencing the silent majority, massive red wave, liberalism, socialism, radical islam, home of the free, communism...you go from one thing to another without any cohesion or explanation. Yes this is completely meaningless, utter nonsense and because things like these are so vague, it's easy to sweep people up who are naive and susceptible. Just say it in a slight menacing voice and they believe any second a socialist might jump from the sealing and eat them up. It indeed doesn't have any real substance, which is problematic when you have a large group of people who think it does.

Simplified there are only two types of people who say things like these: the brainwasher and the ones being brainwashed as the latter just repeats what the former said. I leave it up to you to decide in which category you think you fall under, but I daresay you were not the first one to say some of the things you said. Heck it looks like it came right out of a random 'what to say at a Republican rally'-generator. That's how flaccid it all sounds.

And at this point you're just whining because I stated the obvious, but if you didn't want to get reality-checked, you shouldn't have quoted my post with this nonsense. Do you even remotely understand what you actually write? You underlined at the very beginning that I'm not an American. So who exactly is going to brainwash me again? Lets reverse this a bit. If you weren't American and someone from my country saying this, everyone would think you would have some serious issues. It's because you're presumably an American we somewhat condone it. Even our most radical, nationalist party would laugh at the idea of the government trying to make people gay.

And about the pseudo-scientiest. Did it ever occur to you I might be a real one? Or more precise that I actually have a background in stuff like this? I leave this latter for what it is and you need to take my word for it, but I can guarantee you I have.

 

[Onii Chan]

Then he shouldn't quote my post or clearly state why I got quoted. Instead I get that meaningless BS and I have an extremely strong disdain towards anyone who tries to convince me of something with hollow speeches like that as then they believe I'm stupid enough to actually fall for it.

They already should apply to everyone. That's the freaking point.

I didn't even say any of those words. You just made them all up, except white supremacy, but that was something I myself quoted, so that's redundant. I don't even get how you attempted trying to be shmuck about this when you stand there blatantly lying.

Like me? That doesn't even make any sense. I just condoned that behavior and the best thing you can come up with is "like you"? If you want to play wisecracker, you really need to more concrete as at this point this is like a child that gets insulted and then replies "no you are a xxx". And I have yet to meet a single person who thinks the way I do. In fact it's exactly because of that I understand this very well and here we are back again with what I said in my previous post.

And yes it pretty much is as when the very foundation of your house is non-existent, what can the house do but fall down? Even if by some miracle Jones touches about something truthful, it would be pointless as if you don't understand or don't care for concepts like integrity, objectivism, self-criticism and provenance, it would be all for nought. And yes you don't live in East-Germany, that was exactly the point I was making here. The amount of tolerance and liberty people like Jones receive is ridiculously high and they use that to concoct controversial stories that regularly discredit the instances that provide this tolerant environment. If these stories were actually true, he shouldn't be able to be so freely about it. You like to pretend you're being "silenced" and yadayadayada, but you don't even understand what that means. East Germany and the Cold War are not that long ago.

You bite the proverbial hand that feeds you and then complain it feeds you a little bit less.

So congratulations. Your post didn't do anything whatsoever. You lied, tried to bounce the ball back and proved my points thinking you did the opposite. Might be a bit of a wild guess here, but I reckon at this point you're already trying to put labels on me like I'm supposedly a libtard, a socialist, a fag and things like that. The series of terms you posted seemed to point into that direction. So if you do I really suggest you stop with it because as long as you keep doing that, you're going to have your head smashed against the wall again and again.



No it doesn't. The fact you think it does only reaffirms my previous post that much more. It's a prime example of extreme naivety and also underlines this habit of blurting out terms, but not actually understanding what they mean.

No I'm not an American and I think I'm not the only person on this forum who would react on that with "thank God I'm not". However not being something can be very convenient in certain cases depending on the situation as it allows you to evaluate something from a different perspective. And btw it's not like America is the only country that has freedom of speech, it's just that not all of us get an orgasm when hearing the word 'freedom'.

Now the issue with fundamental rights like freedom of speech, is that they are always explained in an abstract manner so that everyone gets the overall concept. However many of these rights actually can overlap or even conflict with one another. That's why normally in additional legislation it is explained what the limits are and how they correspond with other rights and most importantly how it will function in practice. This can vary from country to country.

To go with your example, you call someone N in public. That person then smashes all your teeth out and breaks every bone in your body. He then replies he used the same right to convey his opinion with his fists. Yeah, you could even justify murder that way. Are you then going to say "I affee *two broken thumbs up*"? You really think that is ok? If not then you admit that it's very well limited. You even pointed it: "law wise". So you succeeded in contradicting your initial statement after two lines. For the record "speech" isn't limited to merely words.

To keep going with this example it's not because it would be allowed in this particular case, that it's allowed in every other case. Context and situation are incredibly important. Also it's not because you get away with it, that therefore it's allowed. Who is going to bother searching for someone who said N once and then ran off. More importantly there's a huge ass difference between saying N in the street once and fabricating and spreading stories via social media that can reach a wide audience about the government poisoning you. These two are not even in the same league.

I don't know much about the American legislative system, though from what I've heard and read, it's far from perfect an plagued by many issues. But even taking that into consideration I can hardly imagine it does not have anything related to murder, beating people within an inch of their life, slander, harassment, treason etc. I also sincerely doubt you know much about this yourself considering you just said "laws against words".

And after that you went along again with either saying irrelevant things or meaningless remarks. I mean which intellectual words? I'm not even a native English speaker. My English is, as far as I'm concerned, basic. Are you now telling me my English is actually of a higher intellectual level than someone who claims to be American?

Yes when you ramble on and jump from one vague thing to another in an inconsistent manner without any explanation, proper context or even showing any understanding of what you just said, you say absolutely nothing. You might as well hear a bee zooming. It makes sounds, but does it mean anything? What you did and still do is a common tactic many politicians and demagogues like to use: trying to hit specific strings so that they easily can connect with their audience without having the need to explain anything. The problem is then that it's unclear how much the orator actually knows and understands. Case and point: you. You blabber on about freedom of speech, but don't even understand it. You go from patriotism, silencing the silent majority, massive red wave, liberalism, socialism, radical islam, home of the free, communism...you go from one thing to another without any cohesion or explanation. Yes this is completely meaningless, utter nonsense and because things like these are so vague, it's easy to sweep people up who are naive and susceptible. Just say it in a slight menacing voice and they believe any second a socialist might jump from the sealing and eat them up. It indeed doesn't have any real substance, which is problematic when you have a large group of people who think it does.

Simplified there are only two types of people who say things like these: the brainwasher and the ones being brainwashed as the latter just repeats what the former said. I leave it up to you to decide in which category you think you fall under, but I daresay you were not the first one to say some of the things you said. Heck it looks like it came right out of a random 'what to say at a Republican rally'-generator. That's how flaccid it all sounds.

And at this point you're just whining because I stated the obvious, but if you didn't want to get reality-checked, you shouldn't have quoted my post with this nonsense. Do you even remotely understand what you actually write? You underlined at the very beginning that I'm not an American. So who exactly is going to brainwash me again? Lets reverse this a bit. If you weren't American and someone from my country saying this, everyone would think you would have some serious issues. It's because you're presumably an American we somewhat condone it. Even our most radical, nationalist party would laugh at the idea of the government trying to make people gay.

And about the pseudo-scientiest. Did it ever occur to you I might be a real one? Or more precise that I actually have a background in stuff like this? I leave this latter for what it is and you need to take my word for it, but I can guarantee you I have.

Did it ever occur to you that perhaps america is the greatest country in the world for a reason? Please give me a single country who has the amount of freedom we do, i'll wait for several years because you won't find a single area in the world with the amount of freedom america has. Civilians in other countries laugh at america yet they're the ones being treated like utter slaves, their government is literally taking away their guns, their speech, their way of life every damn day while you just eat it up. Its stockholm syndrome with you people, the government takes away your toys and you thank them for it, its pathetic. Not even your toys for some parts, your very own life in places like china where you'll get murdered in the streets if you're a homosexual. Yet liberalism has founded themselves upon such a ideology that they worship the very ground of the evil standards of non-american values, they'd rather get mass murdered and raped in the streets than having their very own rights to protest to which they ironically carry out freely to protest the very thing they're doing. This is why i don't take you or any of the left seriously, why would i think of someone highly who treats people of lesser yet ironically wants to be one? And yes the false punishment can ensue upon me if i say the n word, i'd rather just say it out right now because i ain't calling anyone it and thus is a mere reference but i'd get banned for some bullshit, i'm full on for free speech and thus if its not towards anyone i can say things like kike or gook but apparently a single word can amount to some sort of overall punishment? Why? This is what i'm talking about, places like canada where if you call someone a man and they imagine themselves as a female you get arrested, there is nothing stopping me now from traveling to canada and going to a coffee store and waiting for someone to call me a man and then get offended and say at that time i thought of myself as a attack helicopter and boom i get 1 million dollars from court because of some bullshit where i sued him. Your ideologies are so ignorant, you can't counter debate them without calling the opposition irrelevant and invalid and thus because of this you can't defend the very right you should have but sadly dont. I talk like a politician, maybe, but i talk the way i do because i'd rather get to the serious points right off the bat then to just sit in a chair and talk about how my opponent's comments are stupid and thus don't require your time to debunk, which is sadly a overall poisonous trait of liberalism and the people of the lie. Its not being ''vague'' its punching right to the point so no one has to read some bullshit harry potter book about how your farts smell good, i mean you right there in plain words said you don't know much about the american values then why the hell are you even trying to debate me for? Throwing out false flags, and no the laws seem unbalanced because every single state has their own laws and regulations based on the foundation of the overall laws that is presented towards us by the government and thus is based upon the constitution. I wouldn't expect anyone non-american to understand our system, after all your governments choose everything for you like a baby to a spoon.

 

[Fountain]

They already should apply to everyone. That's the freaking point.

But they don't. They should, but they don't.

I didn't even say any of those words. You just made them all up, except white supremacy, but that was something I myself quoted, so that's redundant. I don't even get how you attempted trying to be shmuck about this when you stand there blatantly lying.

I know you didn't, Caliburn, that's why i wasn't talking about you. I was pointing out the hypocrisy behind what you said. Because just as you claimed that people use words like "freedom of speech" in a vague way you also have people using other words like "hate speech" in a vague way. But you were only focusing on words like freedom of speech and the first amendment, censorship etc. without naming a single word that's often abused by sjw's, why?

Like me? That doesn't even make any sense. I just condoned that behavior and the best thing you can come up with is "like you"? If you want to play wisecracker, you really need to more concrete as at this point this is like a child that gets insulted and then replies "no you are a xxx". And I have yet to meet a single person who thinks the way I do. In fact it's exactly because of that I understand this very well and here we are back again with what I said in my previous post.

Doesn't make any sense? You don't think you're prone to being brainwashed? What makes you think you know any better. Your arguments seem very one-sided.

And yes it pretty much is as when the very foundation of your house is non-existent, what can the house do but fall down? Even if by some miracle Jones touches about something truthful, it would be pointless as if you don't understand or don't care for concepts like integrity, objectivism, self-criticism and provenance, it would be all for nought. And yes you don't live in East-Germany, that was exactly the point I was making here. The amount of tolerance and liberty people like Jones receive is ridiculously high and they use that to concoct controversial stories that regularly discredit the instances that provide this tolerant environment. If these stories were actually true, he shouldn't be able to be so freely about it. You like to pretend you're being "silenced" and yadayadayada, but you don't even understand what that means. East Germany and the Cold War are not that long ago.

You bite the proverbial hand that feeds you and then complain it feeds you a little bit less.

Does this sound like someone who knows anything about integrity, objectivism, self-criticism, and provenance?:

"Wait, that abomination finally received some punishment? Faith in humanity went up by +1! It's still in the negatives though, but whatever, take what you can.

Never understood how it was possible he was allowed to do and say what he did for so long.

And "righteous" republican party, lol?"

So what if he made controversial stories. If people like him deserve to be deplatformed for having a different opinion what makes you think everyone else deserves a pass? The fact that you agree with what they say and not an "abomination" like Alex Jones? Do you have any idea how toxic the rest of the media is? Why is Alex Jones the exception?

So congratulations. Your post didn't do anything whatsoever. You lied, tried to bounce the ball back and proved my points thinking you did the opposite. Might be a bit of a wild guess here, but I reckon at this point you're already trying to put labels on me like I'm supposedly a libtard, a socialist, a fag and things like that. The series of terms you posted seemed to point into that direction. So if you do I really suggest you stop with it because as long as you keep doing that, you're going to have your head smashed against the wall again and again.

It didn't even cross my mind but you're certainly acting that way, no offense.

 

[Aim64C]

My goodness.

Info Wars is a CIA-sponsored "controlled opposition" outlet. The entire goal of InfoWars is to take x y or z issue that appears within independent research groups and then spin them up into the most absurd conspiracies imaginable and then broadcast them to the public after sowing them with sensationalism and the like.

For example... I am researching cases of disappearing children from 'undocumented immigrant' populations. Who brings them to the border are people who are not their family, but the law has ICE take the kids and send the not-parents back across the border. The kids are then placed into a sort of private foster care system which is contracted by the government. From there - about half of the kids disappear. No records of who these kids are/were exist, chains of custody are completely up to the imagination, etc. Of course - with so few documents to prove a child does exist, how can one prove they disappeared from the chain of custody to begin with?

Now... what does the CIA do? They grab a hold of this, and then try to get the people researching it distracted by baby-eating reptilian aliens in the white-house, or something. If the group, themselves, isn't distracted - InfoWars picks up on the story, eventually, and presents it how they want to. They may include some of the details that point to there being a real problem - but, generally, they try to focus on sensationalism to be a feel-good for the people distrusting of authority (who should be on-watch for this type of stuff), but to also sabotage any efforts of the genuine researchers bringing up the subject. "Where are the kids" leads to the immediate "Oh, not this reptoid alien crap, again!" from the general population.

Of course, the best lies are the absurd truth, in a way. The people in positions of power don't really consider themselves human - so reptoid alien works rather fittingly. Of course, the old families aren't as homogeneous as many would be led to believe by those in the proverbial driver's seat. The smaller ones have remained more attached to reality as the lead three abused and battered them.





Rayet is one of the more interesting characters of the series.



The more you know of the hidden teachings, the more interesting this anime becomes.

Neon Genesis. Enjoy the show.

 

[Onii Chan]

My goodness.

Info Wars is a CIA-sponsored "controlled opposition" outlet. The entire goal of InfoWars is to take x y or z issue that appears within independent research groups and then spin them up into the most absurd conspiracies imaginable and then broadcast them to the public after sowing them with sensationalism and the like.

For example... I am researching cases of disappearing children from 'undocumented immigrant' populations. Who brings them to the border are people who are not their family, but the law has ICE take the kids and send the not-parents back across the border. The kids are then placed into a sort of private foster care system which is contracted by the government. From there - about half of the kids disappear. No records of who these kids are/were exist, chains of custody are completely up to the imagination, etc. Of course - with so few documents to prove a child does exist, how can one prove they disappeared from the chain of custody to begin with?

Now... what does the CIA do? They grab a hold of this, and then try to get the people researching it distracted by baby-eating reptilian aliens in the white-house, or something. If the group, themselves, isn't distracted - InfoWars picks up on the story, eventually, and presents it how they want to. They may include some of the details that point to there being a real problem - but, generally, they try to focus on sensationalism to be a feel-good for the people distrusting of authority (who should be on-watch for this type of stuff), but to also sabotage any efforts of the genuine researchers bringing up the subject. "Where are the kids" leads to the immediate "Oh, not this reptoid alien crap, again!" from the general population.

Of course, the best lies are the absurd truth, in a way. The people in positions of power don't really consider themselves human - so reptoid alien works rather fittingly. Of course, the old families aren't as homogeneous as many would be led to believe by those in the proverbial driver's seat. The smaller ones have remained more attached to reality as the lead three abused and battered them.





Rayet is one of the more interesting characters of the series.



The more you know of the hidden teachings, the more interesting this anime becomes.

Neon Genesis. Enjoy the show.

Cant take someone seriously who references anime when in a political discussion lol

 

[Aim64C]

Cant take someone seriously who references anime when in a political discussion lol

Well, prepare to be shocked and amused.