Ofc i deny it. Kishimoto's environments and characters are fantastic. We are talking about one of the best Mangakas ever, with art that proves exactly that. On the other hand you prefer Ikemoto's style as a Mangaka, like i said, to each his own.I know you won't.You can like Kishimoto's simpler style, but you can't deny Ikemoto shows stronger form and detail in his environments. Also noticing a trend where you push out harsher edits. LMAO.
Kind of.didnt ikemoto handle environments during Naruto?
ikio Ikemoto (池本幹雄, Ikemoto Mikio) was Masashi Kishimoto's third assistant during his fifteen years of working on the Naruto manga. In an assistant spotlight included with volume 6 of the manga, Kishimoto listed Ikemoto's duties as: "works as a 'mob', drawing crowds and background figures, adding the white to speed lines, highlights, and characters' eyes, and whiting out any art that goes out of the panel and into the gutter, as well as putting stars in the night sky, and adding in half-tones."
In a 2016 interview published in Weekly Shōnen Jump, Kishimoto revealed that Ikemoto also contributed to character designs for the series, notably designing many of the background characters, as well as Haku, Zabuza Momochi, and Hiruzen Sarutobi's battle attire.
Throw out that. Let's talk shapes, shading, and the objective, that's where Ikemoto's environments shit on Kishimoto's dry ones.Ofc i deny it. Kishimoto's environments and characters are fantastic. We are talking about one of the best Mangakas ever, with art that proves exactly that. On the other hand you prefer Ikemoto's style as a Mangaka, like i said, to each his own.
That trend is all in your head but I couldn't care less to be honest.
Why would i throw out my opinion and funnel things to where you want to take them? You still lose. Ikemoto has nothing on Kishi.Throw out that. Let's talk shapes, shading, and the objective, that's where Ikemoto's environments shit on Kishimoto's dry ones.
I really doubt Kishi drew all of that by himself, he usually had a bunch of assistants helping him draw the manga.
I wonder how much it took Kishimoto to draw this...
You must be registered for see images
Kishi listed Ike's duties "as works as a 'mob', drawing crowds and background figures, adding the white to speed lines, highlights, and characters' eyes, and whiting out any art that goes out of the panel and into the gutter, as well as putting stars in the night sky, and adding in half-tones."didnt ikemoto handle environments during Naruto?
Why would i throw out my opinion and funnel things to where you want to take them? You still lose. Ikemoto has nothing on Kishi.
What do you mean by objective?
Edit: Even the panels you posted before don't have anything on Kishi's.
Stop man kishimoto received like 2 national awards for his art while Ikemoto's style sucks so bad that people literally move out of whole Boruto franchise.To prove that you aren't wanking Kishimoto due to pure preference. When I say objective, I mean the unquestionable. You can say you don't like realistic art and that it's worse than minimalist art, but you can't deny that realistic art includes complex shading and shapes.
Just look at the Hokage Rock and how detailed it is.
The "shading" is no more than crevices. The only things that stand out in the panel is there being a shit load of basic-geometrically shaped buildings and the perspective, which is just two point perspective anyhow.You must be registered for see images
Ikemoto's environments are unquestionably more defined and varied in leveling with strong shapes.
You must be registered for see imagesYou must be registered for see imagesYou must be registered for see images
I’d go so far as to say he hasn’t improved at all, to be honest.He's getting better, but not that much. :/
Are u blind? How is the first panel the same as the second panel? :kk:I’d go so far as to say he hasn’t improved at all, to be honest.
No, You’re blind. The tone of the two scenes are entirely different. Yes, the first chapter didn’t have any character shading compared to the later chapters but is that really something to be so ignorantly gleeful about? So much so to go around saying, “I can’t believe how much he improved”? Delusional.Are u blind? How is the first panel the same as the second panel? :kk:
No, You’re blind. The tone of the two scenes are entirely different. Yes, the first chapter didn’t have any character shading compared to the later chapters but is that really something to be so ignorantly gleeful about? So much so to go around saying, “I can’t believe how much he improved”? Delusional.
Great thing my entire post had zero basis on what people subjectively thought of it. If you reread this thread from start to finish, heck, even the title alone, you'll realize that bold means not a thing to me for chronological reasons. Kishimoto's noteworthy award, the "Quil Award," wasn't merited specifically because of his art either. It was for the manga in general, the story and popularity behind it. I'm speaking of art specifically.Stop man kishimoto received like 2 national awards for his art while Ikemoto's style sucks so bad that people literally move out of whole Boruto franchise.
Best manga artists are One piece artist and Naruto artist rest can't stand against them even Toriyama lacks the skills to compete against Kishimoto (the man created biggest anime of all time) and you're comparing Ikemoto the man who can't even create manga as good as some fan arts to him.
I’m one of those people, wholeheartedly. I know the artist can draw “good” if wants to though, which is where Ikemoto differs.People think One-Piece's art is shit.
You have a narrow view of art then.I’m one of those people, wholeheartedly. I know the artist can draw “good” if wants to though, which is where Ikemoto differs.