Ikemoto's Improvement

Reboryushon

Active member
Elite
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
6,168
Kin
178💸
Kumi
2,386💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
I know you won't.:coffee: You can like Kishimoto's simpler style, but you can't deny Ikemoto shows stronger form and detail in his environments. Also noticing a trend where you push out harsher edits. LMAO.
Ofc i deny it. Kishimoto's environments and characters are fantastic. We are talking about one of the best Mangakas ever, with art that proves exactly that. On the other hand you prefer Ikemoto's style as a Mangaka, like i said, to each his own.

That trend is all in your head but I couldn't care less to be honest.

didnt ikemoto handle environments during Naruto?
Kind of.

ikio Ikemoto (池本幹雄, Ikemoto Mikio) was Masashi Kishimoto's third assistant during his fifteen years of working on the Naruto manga. In an assistant spotlight included with volume 6 of the manga, Kishimoto listed Ikemoto's duties as: "works as a 'mob', drawing crowds and background figures, adding the white to speed lines, highlights, and characters' eyes, and whiting out any art that goes out of the panel and into the gutter, as well as putting stars in the night sky, and adding in half-tones."

In a 2016 interview published in Weekly Shōnen Jump, Kishimoto revealed that Ikemoto also contributed to character designs for the series, notably designing many of the background characters, as well as Haku, Zabuza Momochi, and Hiruzen Sarutobi's battle attire.
 

HowDidIGetPrem

Active member
Elite
Joined
Jan 18, 2018
Messages
5,820
Kin
5,803💸
Kumi
1,192💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
Ofc i deny it. Kishimoto's environments and characters are fantastic. We are talking about one of the best Mangakas ever, with art that proves exactly that. On the other hand you prefer Ikemoto's style as a Mangaka, like i said, to each his own.

That trend is all in your head but I couldn't care less to be honest.
Throw out that. Let's talk shapes, shading, and the objective, that's where Ikemoto's environments shit on Kishimoto's dry ones.
 

chopstickchakra

Active member
Legendary
Joined
Jun 4, 2012
Messages
12,896
Kin
4,684💸
Kumi
129💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Well yeah when you draw something so much you're bound to get better and more detailed the longer you go. Let's compare Naruto chap 1 to mid 20s and to end and we could see the same thing.
 

Reboryushon

Active member
Elite
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
6,168
Kin
178💸
Kumi
2,386💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
Throw out that. Let's talk shapes, shading, and the objective, that's where Ikemoto's environments shit on Kishimoto's dry ones.
Why would i throw out my opinion and funnel things to where you want to take them? You still lose. Ikemoto has nothing on Kishi.

What do you mean by objective?

Edit: Even the panels you posted before don't have anything on Kishi's.
 
Last edited:

NextGenNinja

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Mar 11, 2014
Messages
4,665
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️

I wonder how much it took Kishimoto to draw this...
You must be registered for see images
I really doubt Kishi drew all of that by himself, he usually had a bunch of assistants helping him draw the manga.
didnt ikemoto handle environments during Naruto?
Kishi listed Ike's duties "as works as a 'mob', drawing crowds and background figures, adding the white to speed lines, highlights, and characters' eyes, and whiting out any art that goes out of the panel and into the gutter, as well as putting stars in the night sky, and adding in half-tones."
 
Last edited:

HowDidIGetPrem

Active member
Elite
Joined
Jan 18, 2018
Messages
5,820
Kin
5,803💸
Kumi
1,192💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
Why would i throw out my opinion and funnel things to where you want to take them? You still lose. Ikemoto has nothing on Kishi.

What do you mean by objective?

Edit: Even the panels you posted before don't have anything on Kishi's.

To prove that you aren't wanking Kishimoto due to pure preference. When I say objective, I mean the unquestionable. You can say you don't like realistic art and that it's worse than minimalist art, but you can't deny that realistic art includes complex shading and shapes.

Just look at the Hokage Rock and how detailed it is.
You must be registered for see images
The "shading" is no more than crevices. The only things that stand out in the panel is there being a shit load of basic-geometrically shaped buildings and the perspective, which is just two point perspective anyhow.

Ikemoto's environments are unquestionably more defined and varied in leveling with strong shapes.
You must be registered for see images
You must be registered for see images
You must be registered for see images
 

Pulkit singh3

Active member
Regular
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
874
Kin
965💸
Kumi
369💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
To prove that you aren't wanking Kishimoto due to pure preference. When I say objective, I mean the unquestionable. You can say you don't like realistic art and that it's worse than minimalist art, but you can't deny that realistic art includes complex shading and shapes.

Just look at the Hokage Rock and how detailed it is.
You must be registered for see images
The "shading" is no more than crevices. The only things that stand out in the panel is there being a shit load of basic-geometrically shaped buildings and the perspective, which is just two point perspective anyhow.

Ikemoto's environments are unquestionably more defined and varied in leveling with strong shapes.
You must be registered for see images
You must be registered for see images
You must be registered for see images
Stop man kishimoto received like 2 national awards for his art while Ikemoto's style sucks so bad that people literally move out of whole Boruto franchise.

Best manga artists are One piece artist and Naruto artist rest can't stand against them even Toriyama lacks the skills to compete against Kishimoto (the man created biggest anime of all time) and you're comparing Ikemoto the man who can't even create manga as good as some fan arts to him.
 

Animegoin

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Feb 24, 2018
Messages
4,020
Kin
4,124💸
Kumi
2,010💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Are u blind? How is the first panel the same as the second panel? :kk:
No, You’re blind. The tone of the two scenes are entirely different. Yes, the first chapter didn’t have any character shading compared to the later chapters but is that really something to be so ignorantly gleeful about? So much so to go around saying, “I can’t believe how much he improved”? Delusional.
 

123fire

Active member
Supreme
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
20,150
Kin
20💸
Kumi
-33💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
No, You’re blind. The tone of the two scenes are entirely different. Yes, the first chapter didn’t have any character shading compared to the later chapters but is that really something to be so ignorantly gleeful about? So much so to go around saying, “I can’t believe how much he improved”? Delusional.
:lmao: :lmao:
 

HowDidIGetPrem

Active member
Elite
Joined
Jan 18, 2018
Messages
5,820
Kin
5,803💸
Kumi
1,192💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
Stop man kishimoto received like 2 national awards for his art while Ikemoto's style sucks so bad that people literally move out of whole Boruto franchise.

Best manga artists are One piece artist and Naruto artist rest can't stand against them even Toriyama lacks the skills to compete against Kishimoto (the man created biggest anime of all time) and you're comparing Ikemoto the man who can't even create manga as good as some fan arts to him.
Great thing my entire post had zero basis on what people subjectively thought of it. If you reread this thread from start to finish, heck, even the title alone, you'll realize that bold means not a thing to me for chronological reasons. Kishimoto's noteworthy award, the "Quil Award," wasn't merited specifically because of his art either. It was for the manga in general, the story and popularity behind it. I'm speaking of art specifically.
You must be registered for see images


There's so many holes in what you're arguing that it's ridiculous. Both Toriyama's(same face) and Oda's(silly, wonky) art are prime prey for being teared into by many(no, I'm not shitting on their art), so it doesn't even go along with your mob-driven argument.
 

kiiro

Active member
Veteran
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
2,376
Kin
57💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
If I dont remember wrong, Ikemoto just have different style.

He used more curves while Kishimoto uses more straight lines.

Both are good, they have been drawing a lot of time. Sometimes they just might not want to draw with details. Look at this drawing:

You must be registered for see images


That is Togashi from HxH, that is way ugly. But he also can draw very good:

You must be registered for see images


The same with Ikemoto, he is very good if he wants to. I like his style but Kishimoto has shown better draws.
 
Top