How the controversial cover should be

[soretynha]

You must be registered for see images

Much better, right?

 

[123fire]

Yup 100x better!!

 

[Fountain]

No. People need to grow the hell up. And respect others art.

 

[salamander uchiha]

I agree

 

[-Punk-]

Yeah.

I’m afraid the next cover art will involve some flexibility

 

[Yeah right]

I prefer the original. If you want to change it, so be it, but you can't say it's better.

 

[Punk Hazard]

lmaooo WHY DO THEY KEEP DOING THIS

 

[HowDidIGetPrem]

Definitely better, but still have to fix the Trex hands.
The current mangaka is just going all out tbh, Sarada even walks in a perverted way(her feet face inwards when walking in the manga. Try walking with your feet pointing inwards and see how it looks.) different from the males.

 

[chopstickchakra]

People liking the OP is ironic because the pic says to like for the pedo photo so it kinda looks like your voting for that one .

 

[Ōkami]

Way better, Ike is probably fuming though.

Just wait til the five year anniversary of the manga, colored spread with all these girls in skimpy bikinis.

 

[Fountain]

Sheesh, you guys are insane to call it better.

It's almost as if i recreated a Bob Ross artwork on paint and suddenly everyone preferred that over the original simply because i added a lake or removed a tree or two. So insensitive towards the artist and his work over literally nothing.

 

[Ōkami]

Sheesh, you guys are insane to call it better.

It's almost as if i recreated a Bob Ross artwork on paint and suddenly everyone preferred that over the original simply because i added a lake or removed a tree or two. So insensitive towards the artist and his work over literally nothing.

So you prefer if young girls are drawn provocatively?

 

[Konno]

Yeah, I see the difference and it would be a better version.
But, really, we are gonna talk about short skirts and their outfits again!

 

[Fountain]

So you prefer if young girls are drawn provocatively?

I prefer if people were more respectful and used their heads to judge the artwork by what it is instead of by personal insecurities and what they perceive to be morally right or wrong.

 

[soretynha]

People liking the OP is ironic because the pic says to like for the pedo photo so it kinda looks like your voting for that one .

yeah FB polls are mostly inconsistent.

 

[HowDidIGetPrem]

Sheesh, you guys are insane to call it better.

It's almost as if i recreated a Bob Ross artwork on paint and suddenly everyone preferred that over the original simply because i added a lake or removed a tree or two. So insensitive towards the artist and his work over literally nothing.

No.. this is more like someone getting likes for editing your edit of Bob Ross' work and correcting it to look like the original. In this case, you also put two bushes and a tree in your edit that kind of look like a penis together. Being sexually segustive.

 

[Fountain]

No.. this is more like someone getting likes for editing your edit of Bob Ross' work and correcting it to look like the original. In this case, you also put two bushes and a tree in your edit that kind of look like a penis together. Being sexually segustive.

Except the original is the work on the left.

 

[Ōkami]

I prefer if people were more respectful and used their heads to judge the artwork by what it is instead of by personal insecurities and what they perceive to be morally right or wrong.

Having a problem with young girls being drawn provocatively is an insecurity?

 

[Punk Hazard]

used their heads to judge the artwork by what it is

Two 12 year old girls dressed like callgirls at a club?

 

[Fountain]

Having a problem with young girls being drawn provocatively is an insecurity?

Yes. It's an insecurity that you might be seen as a pedo.