I swear I seen so much shit given to pica for fighting zoro the way he did. Everyone says pica was neg to low diffed by zoro. In my opinion it was at least mid diff. Pica realized once he clashed with zoro that physically he was inferior (i mean if you stay in a giant statue all the time how else do you think you will work on close combat ... especially against someone who specializes in it) he realized this so he used his other stat (being speed) to have zoro keep trying to attack him while he dodge/phased out of the way. His speed > zoros which did give zoro a hard time due to being occupied for a lot of dressrosa.
Now the reason I say hypocrite is because luffy does the same exact thing against cracker. Nobody bats an eyelash or calls him a coward hell I even remember a post praising him for using his intellect in that fight. Honestly what is the difference in the situation? Aside from the zoro wank that does not appear in whole cake island (again I like zoro I just don't like his followers). The reason why I am posting this is because I honestly want to see what you guys have to say. Had luffy lost would you guys say he had been neg to low diff by cracker (even after 11hrs)? Like you guys say about pica? Is luffy a coward for fighting the way he did? Like pica (in your guys opinions)? Also i think people tend to forget pica was forced to stay in his location (zoro would have won anyway but it would have taken even longer) by doffy because he was tasked of not letting anyone come inside the palace (top) by doffy. So where ever pica was traveling to he would always do a rebound back to stop people from entering with his mountain body. Idk why zoro toook So long to realize this.... (intelligence is a key factor in a fight which is why law is my favorite and always will be) So yeah pica was dealing with zoro in addition to hundreds of collosem fighters (that king punch guy included). Luffy actually had a partner in his fight who made it possible for him to even be able to stand a chance.
So what are your thoughts on this comparison or do you guys just think I am delusional and there is no comparison to both fights at all?
Now the reason I say hypocrite is because luffy does the same exact thing against cracker. Nobody bats an eyelash or calls him a coward hell I even remember a post praising him for using his intellect in that fight. Honestly what is the difference in the situation? Aside from the zoro wank that does not appear in whole cake island (again I like zoro I just don't like his followers). The reason why I am posting this is because I honestly want to see what you guys have to say. Had luffy lost would you guys say he had been neg to low diff by cracker (even after 11hrs)? Like you guys say about pica? Is luffy a coward for fighting the way he did? Like pica (in your guys opinions)? Also i think people tend to forget pica was forced to stay in his location (zoro would have won anyway but it would have taken even longer) by doffy because he was tasked of not letting anyone come inside the palace (top) by doffy. So where ever pica was traveling to he would always do a rebound back to stop people from entering with his mountain body. Idk why zoro toook So long to realize this.... (intelligence is a key factor in a fight which is why law is my favorite and always will be) So yeah pica was dealing with zoro in addition to hundreds of collosem fighters (that king punch guy included). Luffy actually had a partner in his fight who made it possible for him to even be able to stand a chance.
You must be registered for see images
So what are your thoughts on this comparison or do you guys just think I am delusional and there is no comparison to both fights at all?
Last edited: