[Discussion] Would Luffy defeated Cracker without Nami's help?

[Our Lord Sasuke]

Title.

 

[Donald J Trump]

Probably but it would have been more difficult. Cracker doesn't like pain, he doesn't have willpower.

 

[Dgrayman]

luffy is going to defeat dogtooth starting next chapter watch

 

[~Naruto&Itachi~]

Lol no

 

[ssjelf]

No, luffy was beat once he ran out of G4. Without nami, he would not have been able to go back into G4 or eat crackers soldiers.

 

[Dęvîa Puęrî]

No not at all

He has nothing in his power to make the biscuts soggy... ppl forget to realize that the only reason the fight lasted so long was because 1 luffy was running and kept eating the biscuits (thanks to nami) which replished his stamina. had nami not been there the fight would def have ended way sooner..

 

[Rikudou Tobi]

Yeah he could. He just needs to eat the crackers while in G4 or try out the Gear 2: Giant gear mode.

 

[ArabianLuffy]

It's annoying how hard as steel the biscuits are. Makes a perfect defense. Luffy just wastes his stamina on breaking those hard biscuits and they keep coming back. It's a one sided battle for Cracker. No matter how anyone would reform it for Luffy, it won't happen.

 

[Dgrayman]

of course it just would of took longer, its all about matchups zoro would of been a better match up for cracker, because instead.of trying to break the biscuts, he would of sliced them, for the people acting cracker would of low diffed luffy without nami, yall need to help

 

[Uzumaki Macho]

or try out the Gear 2: Giant gear mode.

what??

 

[Punk Hazard]

Lol no

No, luffy was beat once he ran out of G4. Without nami, he would not have been able to go back into G4 or eat crackers soldiers.

No not at all

He has nothing in his power to make the biscuts soggy... ppl forget to realize that the only reason the fight lasted so long was because 1 luffy was running and kept eating the biscuits (thanks to nami) which replished his stamina. had nami not been there the fight would def have ended way sooner..

These posts pretty much hit the nail on the head

of course it just would of took longer, its all about matchups zoro would of been a better match up for cracker, because instead.of trying to break the biscuts, he would of sliced them, for the people acting cracker would of low diffed luffy without nami, yall need to help

Why do people think Zoro cutting Cracker's biscuits would be easier than Luffy smashing it?

what??

I wanna say he means combining Gear 2 and 3, in which case idk why he called it something so dumb.

 

[Love Cook]

This fight already happened in the manga and Luffy was dead to rights until Nami came in to save him.

So the answer is no.

If he has the intel from a previous experience it's a big maybe.

 

[Rikudou Tobi]

what??

chapter 482

 

[LBeezy]

Of course he would..

Luffy > Cracker

 

[Love Cook]

Of course he would..

Luffy > Cracker

He should've done it in the manga, would've made your argument more convincing.

 

[Hellioncurse]

He should've done it in the manga, would've made your argument more convincing.

He did break his biscuit in one punch?

 

[Love Cook]

He did break his biscuit in one punch?

Yeah he did, there was also more than one biscuit and he exhausted Luffy out of his G4.

Luffy lost in a battle of stamina until Nami came in and saved him, Luffy replenished of the cookies and was able to continue.

 

[loj]

Eventually he would.

 

[OG sama]

Just like others have stated, he would have lost as soon as G4 ran out.

His stamina is straight up terrible in G4.

 

[Sakazuki]

eventually, as hes the main character