This has nothing to do with what he said per se, but more the fact that what he said and his situation got so much support from the conservative community.
I never once said that this is the belief of all of the conservatives because I never even said it was the belief of the conservative in the article. I was using his opinions to show the hypocrisy of the situation. I'll break it down:
Conservative student explains the situation and how he feels left out. - Praise and agreement from conservative community.
Minority group explains a situation and how they feel targeted(Or any other adjective) - Called snowflakes by conservative community.
Does that mean I believe every conservative falls into those two specific schools of thought? No. So sure I used a word that can be perceived as a generalization. That wasn't even close to my intention though. You zeroed in on one aspect and didn't look at the larger picture.
Again, there is no hypocrisy, and you're continuing to make the same contradiction you mad in your previous comment.
Both sides of a political spectrum extend from center-moderate, to far extremes at opposite ends of the spectrum. where two people (in this case communities) can exist on the same side of the spectrum, their beliefs, ideologies, and viewpoints can vastly differ from one another to such an degree, they become incomperable. So, It's possible for a conservative(s) to act contrary to the beliefs of another conservative(s).
The only way for hypocrisy to take place is if conservativism is a monolith meaning there is one set of beliefs, viewpoints, and actions across all conservatives, or if you have evidence supporting the claim that the same group of conservatives that support this article are the same group of conservatives calling people snowflakes.
Submitting to the idea that conservativism is a monolith (which you're guilty of by default) would make you a hypocrite, and being unable to provide evidence that the conservative who wrote this article or the same group of conservatives supporting this article are simultaneously dismissing minorities as snowflakes would make you wrong and a hypocrite.
People in this country are quick to dismiss the struggles of others and equally as quick to embrace a very similar struggle by someone of their own color/beliefs. They use things like color, religion, or beliefs to prejudge people before even hearing their side and it should never be that way.
I agree, and arguably everyone is guilty of this. People attaching themselves to an "in group", and casting out those determined to be the "out group" has been a reality of humanity since the dawn of society and exist in all facets of life; we're all tribal creatures. We delineate between the in group and outgroup to establish dominance hierachies and from dominance hierachies, societial structures; all done to better our chances of survival. This isnt an appeal to nature, or an excuse to any group of people to dismiss the struggles of any other group, I just wanted to give you my perspective on why people might commit acts hypocrisy in a political setting.
My belief is that we as a species should attempt to build connections outside of our in group whenever possible because that's how we grow as individuals and progress as a society. But, I also believe not all connections are worth making, especially when the out group is a threat to the ingroup.