[Discussion] What Is Your Stance On The Claim That Homosexuality......

[JStar King]

Do you believe that homosexuality and the LGBT Agenda are being forced on children? What is your honest stance on this? Do you believe that children have the right to know that they have a choice on being gay or whatever or that they shouldn't be exposed to it?

[VIDEO=youtube;61DySQAgQuQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61DySQAgQuQ[/VIDEO]​

Also, what is your stance on the Transgender Bathroom laws and the Cub Scouts opening up to transgender kids. Do you believe it is right or wrong?

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images

Be honest and don't be scared to share your opinion, whether negative or positive on the issue.

 

[Yeah right]

Children should be exposed to as much diversity as possible. Everything.
I like the strawman cartoon illustration. that's the point of exposing them to everything. They will be able to recognizing the bull---t that the left and right give them.

 

[Punk Hazard]

Are homosexual relationships being forced on children any more than heterosexual relationships? Any medium that a child looks at, they can see heterosexual romances, from cartoons to movies, to music, or whatever. Wanda and Cosmo, Jimmy Neutron's parents, main characters liking a member of the opposite ***, and that's fine, so why can't it be fine that homosexuals are portrayed with normalcy in the media?

As for the transgender bathroom issue, transgenders have been targeted and attacked by cis people in bathrooms more than the inverse has occurred. You can be attacked by anyone in any bathroom.

 

[JStar King]

Are homosexual relationships being forced on children any more than heterosexual relationships? Any medium that a child looks at, they can see heterosexual romances, from cartoons to movies, to music, or whatever. Wanda and Cosmo, Jimmy Neutron's parents, main characters liking a member of the opposite ***, and that's fine, so why can't it be fine that homosexuals are portrayed with normalcy in the media?

As for the transgender bathroom issue, transgenders have been targeted and attacked by cis people in bathrooms more than the inverse has occurred. You can be attacked by anyone in any bathroom.

Because there are many people who believe that homosexuality goes against nature. We, as humans or even animals, are meant to breed the next generation and keep the species going. But it is of our free will that we decide to go against that so called purpose.

 

[Im Still Robin]

Are homosexual relationships being forced on children any more than heterosexual relationships? Any medium that a child looks at, they can see heterosexual romances, from cartoons to movies, to music, or whatever. Wanda and Cosmo, Jimmy Neutron's parents, main characters liking a member of the opposite ***, and that's fine, so why can't it be fine that homosexuals are portrayed with normalcy in the media?

As for the transgender bathroom issue, transgenders have been targeted and attacked by cis people in bathrooms more than the inverse has occurred. You can be attacked by anyone in any bathroom.

Children should be exposed to as much diversity as possible. Everything.
I like the strawman cartoon illustration. that's the point of exposing them to everything. They will be able to recognizing the bull---t that the left and right give them.

Idiots. Idiots everywhere.

Shet isn't normal and never will it be seen as normal. If anything Trump does right I hope he retcons that shet.

It's disgusting but people are people...just because you're have the free will to kill a person doesn't mean it's right..same with this.

Gay "love" is just lustful bs is all.

Lastly stop bring this shet to NB

 

[Belserion]

Because there are many people who believe that homosexuality goes against nature. We, as humans or even animals, are meant to breed the next generation and keep the species going. But it is of our free will that we decide to go against that so called purpose.

Oh god here we go again.
The only reason why you created this thread was to bring up this argument again.

It's the same, over and over again. Animals have *** with the same gender as well. And looking from different standpoint we humans practice *** for enjoyment too. So if a Heterosexual couple practices safer *** they go against nature by your standpoint too.

And hate to break it to you but homosexuality is more Part of the nature than safer ***. So why do we keep teaching children that safer *** is important if it goes against nature?

 

[Yeah right]

If people look up the idea about being in a spectrum, it would answer the nature question. People are too black and white about this issue.

If we were ruled by nature, basically right now trump would be the only person who would be allowed to breed. There are way too many humans for this type of thinking to work.

 

[Nagi]

This world is too damn sensitive. Do whatever you want. Just don't rub it in my face. I'm not rubbing my heterosexuality in your face. The only people who got a problem with Homosexuality are sensitive people who already got a bunch of other issues. So don't waste your breath or time. Just enjoy your life doing you.

 

[Punk Hazard]

Because there are many people who believe that homosexuality goes against nature. We, as humans or even animals, are meant to breed the next generation and keep the species going. But it is of our free will that we decide to go against that so called purpose.

For one thing, so what? That kinda comes with intelligence. We can find more out of life than just survive and reproduce. That's kinda what makes being a person better than being a beast.

Secondly, saying that homosexuality isn't natural is a dumb argument for two reasons.

1. Something being natural doesn't mean it's right, and vice versa. Something can be a natural reaction/feeling, but also be wrong. For example, if you take something from me, I might get angry enough to want to hurt you. That's a natural reaction, but it would be wrong to act on it. Natural=/=right, unnatural=/=wrong.

2. Homosexuality is found across thousands of animal species. Contemporary scientific studies support that homosexuality isn't a choice, but a product of biological and environmental factors.

This "not natural" notion is further invalid when you remember that having *** for pleasure falls right in line with the natural, biological capabilities of human beings. It can be argued that *** for reproduction is no more natural than *** for pleasure.

If free will and the nervous ability for genitals to feel pleasure are why people have *** solely for pleasure, then *** for pleasure is natural because both of those things stem from the cognitive and physical natures and physiology of humans.

Idiots. Idiots everywhere.

Shet isn't normal and never will it be seen as normal. If anything Trump does right I hope he retcons that shet.

It's disgusting but people are people...just because you're have the free will to kill a person doesn't mean it's right..same with this.

Gay "love" is just lustful bs is all.

Lastly stop bring this shet to NB

That depends on what you mean by "normal." If by normal, you mean it's simply what's expected and the typical, then sure, it's abnormal, but so what?

If by normal, you mean the opposite of dysfunctional, then you're still in the wrong ballpark since homosexuality is not dysfunctional.

Based on just this, you have no real solid basis for your homophobia.

 

[JStar King]

Oh god here we go again.
The only reason why you created this thread was to bring up this argument again.

It's the same, over and over again. Animals have *** with the same gender as well. And looking from different standpoint we humans practice *** for enjoyment too. So if a Heterosexual couple practices safer *** they go against nature by your standpoint too.

And hate to break it to you but homosexuality is more Part of the nature than safer ***. So why do we keep teaching children that safer *** is important if it goes against nature?

No, I just wanted to hear everyone's opinions on the matter.

 

[Im Still Robin]

For one thing, so what? That kinda comes with intelligence. We can find more out of life than just survive and reproduce. That's kinda what makes being a person better than being a beast.

Secondly, saying that homosexuality isn't natural is a dumb argument for two reasons.

1. Something being natural doesn't mean it's right, and vice versa. Something can be a natural reaction/feeling, but also be wrong. For example, if you take something from me, I might get angry enough to want to hurt you. That's a natural reaction, but it would be wrong to act on it. Natural=/=right, unnatural=/=wrong.

2. Homosexuality is found across thousands of animal species. Contemporary scientific studies support that homosexuality isn't a choice, but a product of biological and environmental factors.

This "not natural" notion is further invalid when you remember that having *** for pleasure falls right in line with the natural, biological capabilities of human beings. It can be argued that *** for reproduction is no more natural than *** for pleasure.

If free will and the nervous ability for genitals to feel pleasure are why people have *** solely for pleasure, then *** for pleasure is natural because both of those things stem from the cognitive and physical natures and physiology of humans.



That depends on what you mean by "normal." If by normal, you mean it's simply what's expected and the typical, then sure, it's abnormal, but so what?

If by normal, you mean the opposite of dysfunctional, then you're still in the wrong ballpark since homosexuality is not dysfunctional.

Based on just this, you have no real solid basis for your homophobia.

Normal as is now your role stop trying to prove that you're different by being a rebel.

You people are trying to force into something acceptable when it's clearly not. It brings chaos weather you see it or not.

The world is shet already granted but just make it more shet because people are given the free will by God himself? No. And no based on your claims and disagreement with logic, facts, and normalism you think I'm wrong.

Which I'm not because I actually don't care about what people do but showing and exposing it to kids is not okay idc if you agree with being gay or not and you know that.

Corrupted people, mindset, rebel bs tendency that want to be seen as correct, forcing inappropriate ideals, twisting logic to fit your argument....lol wasn't born yesterday ***** none of that bs works on a realist.

 

[Belserion]

No, I just wanted to hear everyone's opinions on the matter.

But you replied to Riker saying that the reason why Heterosexuality can be portrayed with normalcy is because of it being natural.

But safer *** is also portrayed with normalcy despite going against the Very rules of nature.

 

[JStar King]

But you replied to Riker saying that the reason why Heterosexuality can be portrayed with normalcy is because of it being natural.

But safer *** is also portrayed with normalcy despite going against the Very rules of nature.

That is what some people believe though.

 

[Punk Hazard]

Normal as is now your role stop trying to prove that you're different by being a rebel.

You people are trying to force into something acceptable when it's clearly not. It brings chaos weather you see it or not.

The world is shet already granted but just make it more shet because people are given the free will by God himself? No. And no based on your claims and disagreement with logic, facts, and normalism you think I'm wrong.

Which I'm not because I actually don't care about what people do but showing and exposing it to kids is not okay idc if you agree with being gay or not and you know that.

Corrupted people, mindset, rebel bs tendency that want to be seen as correct, forcing inappropriate ideals, twisting logic to fit your argument....lol wasn't born yesterday ***** none of that bs works on a realist.

Dawg, all this is is you repeating "Homosexuality isn't right and normal" over and over.

1. In what way is homosexuality not normal? Does that way inherently mean wrong?

2. Why is homosexuality not acceptable?

3. What chaos does it bring that's inherent to homosexuality and can't be found in heterosexuality?

4. Why is it okay to show children heterosexual feelings and acts, but not homosexual feelings and acts of the same level?

5. How does homosexuality make the world worse?

You gotta answer these questions if you wanna actually argue your point. Saying "No it's wrong" over and over is just immature and childish, and shows you have no real rhyme or reasoning behind your homo/transphobia.

 

[Yeah right]

Normal as is now your role stop trying to prove that you're different by being a rebel.

You people are trying to force into something acceptable when it's clearly not. It brings chaos weather you see it or not.

The world is shet already granted but just make it more shet because people are given the free will by God himself? No. And no based on your claims and disagreement with logic, facts, and normalism you think I'm wrong.

Which I'm not because I actually don't care about what people do but showing and exposing it to kids is not okay idc if you agree with being gay or not and you know that.

Corrupted people, mindset, rebel bs tendency that want to be seen as correct, forcing inappropriate ideals, twisting logic to fit your argument....lol wasn't born yesterday ***** none of that bs works on a realist.

Corrupting? You mean informing. And by your own logic, normalizing it would prevent "rebel bs tendency" you are entering this already with a biased mindset. Not very logical bro.

 

[Nagi]

Dawg, all this is is you repeating "Homosexuality isn't right and normal" over and over.

1. In what way is homosexuality not normal? Does that way inherently mean wrong?

2. Why is homosexuality not acceptable?

3. What chaos does it bring that's inherent to homosexuality and can't be found in heterosexuality?

4. Why is it okay to show children heterosexual feelings and acts, but not homosexual feelings and acts of the same level?

5. How does homosexuality make the world worse?

You gotta answer these questions if you wanna actually argue your point. Saying "No it's wrong" over and over is just immature and childish, and shows you have no real rhyme or reasoning behind your homo/transphobia.

Children are very sensitive beings. Showing them homosexual feelings might make some kids against Heterosexual or question their parents or belief. This may lead children to believe that Heterosexual people are wrong and must be destroyed.

Bottom line is that Chidlren are very pure hearted. Painting that homosexual color on them is far more risker than Heterosexual color.

 

[Punk Hazard]

Children are very sensitive beings. Showing them homosexual feelings might make some kids against Heterosexual or question their parents or belief. This may lead children to believe that Heterosexual people are wrong and must be destroyed.

Bottom line is that Chidlren are very pure hearted. Painting that homosexual color on them is far more risker than Heterosexual color.

True. It's a damn shame that children don't have parental figures and other adult figures in their lives to teach them and guide them past misconceptions. Too bad those don't exist, right?

Also, what you're saying sounds like the only two alternatives are show children heterosexuals and let them be homophobic, or show them homosexuals and let them be heterophobic. That's just not an intelligent thing to say.

 

[Yeah right]

Children are very sensitive beings. Showing them homosexual feelings might make some kids against Heterosexual or question their parents or belief. This may lead children to believe that Heterosexual people are wrong and must be destroyed.

Bottom line is that Chidlren are very pure hearted. Painting that homosexual color on them is far more risker than Heterosexual color.

Seriously, no disrespect. But... I can't say anything without calling you out. I want you to think really hard and see if what you said makes any sense at all. Stop with children being pure. They know less but that doesn't mean they need to be sheltered. It's the job of the parent to talk with their children if they have questions. What show are they watching where they would think bad of their own parents. They are just being exposed to another lifestyle.

 

[Belserion]

True. It's a damn shame that children don't have parental figures and other adult figures in their lives to teach them and guide them past misconceptions. Too bad those don't exist, right?

Also, what you're saying sounds like the only two alternatives are show children heterosexuals and let them be homophobic, or show them homosexuals and let them be heterophobic. That's just not an intelligent thing to say.

Apparently all homosexual kids are heterophobic now.

 

[Nagi]

True. It's a damn shame that children don't have parental figures and other adult figures in their lives to teach them and guide them past misconceptions. Too bad those don't exist, right?

Also, what you're saying sounds like the only two alternatives are show children heterosexuals and let them be homophobic, or show them homosexuals and let them be heterophobic. That's just not an intelligent thing to say.

It ain't an intelligent thing to say, but it is the truth. Unless, people are ready to reject the idea of "God is everything". Only then, we can preach that Spiritual connection or love has no gender. But the world ain't ready for that. So therefore, the children have to discover it on their own in high school or college.

Apparently all homosexual kids are heterophobic now.

it is hard to teach children that Both are right. Then you gonna come home to your kid talking about they got a boyfriend and a girlfriend at the same time. Guess it is all in the way you teaches.