- Joined
- Jun 20, 2012
- Messages
- 17,100
- Reaction score
- 862
Smaller version of what?
His combination, nowhere near the size of it used later on when it was larger than Bijju sized trees
You must be registered for see links
not even at its full scale.Smaller version of what?
I'm going to get hated for this, but I tend to view them as rivals given that Kisame doesn't have an advantageous location. I can see both sides rather clearly and most who tend to gravitate towards Kisame neglect the fact that majority of characters within the manga haven't displayed their entire repertoire of ninjutsu. Kakuzu would fall under that category mostly because it's inconceivable for Kakuzu, who possesses compatibility in every ninjutsu and eclipses Kakashi in elemental ninjutsu would only have access to one jutsu per element.
Feats certainly are a thing, but through portrayal and logical deduction, it makes no sense why Kakuzu would be deprived of diversity in his ninjutsu given that inferior shinobi have used multiple techinques within a specific element in the manga and it was explicitly shown that even inept fighters could learn doton manipulation relatively easily. Given that, Kakuzu should possess a variety of defenses in Doton, capable of resisting majority of Kakuzu's Suiton due to Doton being the advantageous element.
Additionally, I'm honestly baffled about how people are comparing the scope of both fighter's techniques to deduce why Kisame's ninjutsu is superior when superb ninja such as Kakuzu have the ability to manipulate the area of their attack with Shape Manipulation, one of the core aspects of chakra control and Kishimoto's conception of the manga has evolved with the magnitude of techniques having to escalate substantially as presented in the War Arc with Fodder erecting Doton Walls that are absurdly large in comparison to what's presented in the Immortals Arc. Because of that, it's unfair to compare Kakuzu's Ninjutsu to Kisame's when Kisame had the opportunity to succumb that level of power escalation while Kakuzu didn't and hardly displayed any screen-time when he did.
That said, I can see both fighters winning because they have rivaled strength, but I gravitate towards Kakuzu more often than not considering Kakuzu possesses the advantage through Doton while he can perform both offensive and defensive techniques simultaneously through his Masks.
I like you.
That being said, hype is hype its like giving Kakashi the 1000 jutsu he should have copied and what not all we can do is blame Kishi for giving us such a potentially diverse character and showing us so little. That being said Doton is still countered by Samehada and while I have always seen them as rivals Kisame should win more than not. Kakusu has shown differences with shape manipulation however making something as large as WD or Kisame's suitons would need Kisame like chakra which while Kakuzu's stamina is impressive its not that high.
I'm going to get hated for this, but I tend to view them as rivals given that Kisame doesn't have an advantageous location. I can see both sides rather clearly and most who tend to gravitate towards Kisame neglect the fact that majority of characters within the manga haven't displayed their entire repertoire of ninjutsu. Kakuzu would fall under that category mostly because it's inconceivable for Kakuzu, who possesses compatibility in every ninjutsu and eclipses Kakashi in elemental ninjutsu would only have access to one jutsu per element.
Feats certainly are a thing, but through portrayal and logical deduction, it makes no sense why Kakuzu would be deprived of diversity in his ninjutsu given that inferior shinobi have used multiple techinques within a specific element in the manga and it was explicitly shown that even inept fighters could learn doton manipulation relatively easily. Given that, Kakuzu should possess a variety of defenses in Doton, capable of resisting majority of Kakuzu's Suiton due to Doton being the advantageous element.
Additionally, I'm honestly baffled about how people are comparing the scope of both fighter's techniques to deduce why Kisame's ninjutsu is superior when superb ninja such as Kakuzu have the ability to manipulate the area of their attack with Shape Manipulation, one of the core aspects of chakra control and Kishimoto's conception of the manga has evolved with the magnitude of techniques having to escalate substantially as presented in the War Arc with Fodder erecting Doton Walls that are absurdly large in comparison to what's presented in the Immortals Arc. Because of that, it's unfair to compare Kakuzu's Ninjutsu to Kisame's when Kisame had the opportunity to succumb that level of power escalation while Kakuzu didn't and hardly displayed any screen-time when he did.
That said, I can see both fighters winning because they have rivaled strength, but I gravitate towards Kakuzu more often than not considering Kakuzu possesses the advantage through Doton while he can perform both offensive and defensive techniques simultaneously through his Masks.
I've always said this regarding the 3 middle Akatsuki members.
Portrayal = Sasori, he has the best portrayal of the 3. I'm sure if a fight occurred in the manga he'd be favored.
Feats = Kisame, not by a landslide but it's there.
Portrayal + Feats = Kakuzu. His portrayal > Kisame, his feats > Sasori.
Yeah, that sounds good. My only problem with Feats is under this scenario where we're comparing feats from two entirely different time periods with Kishimoto's artistic choices changing drastically as time continued. Kisame's feats look more stunning than Kakuzu's from a superficial standpoint, but when we take into account thatYou must be registered for see links, it's only reasonable that Kakuzu's feats would be up-scaled as a result or else we'd be invalidating Kakuzu's portrayal.
I've always said this regarding the 3 middle Akatsuki members.
Portrayal = Sasori, he has the best portrayal of the 3. I'm sure if a fight occurred in the manga he'd be favored.
Feats = Kisame, not by a landslide but it's there.
Portrayal + Feats = Kakuzu. His portrayal > Kisame, his feats > Sasori.
Yeah, that sounds good. My only problem with Feats is under this scenario where we're comparing feats from two entirely different time periods with Kishimoto's artistic choices changing drastically as time continued. Kisame's feats look more stunning than Kakuzu's from a superficial standpoint, but when we take into account thatYou must be registered for see links, it's only reasonable that Kakuzu's feats would be up-scaled as a result or else we'd be invalidating Kakuzu's portrayal.
What danger would he be in honestly? All his elements gets absorbed. GSB absorbs his elements and the chakra out of his skin rendering Domu useless so Kakuzu gets blown down.Samehada is not absorbing domu. He would need to be holding on to Kakuzu to absorb the chakra. But getting close to do that would be dangerous for Kisame.
Kisame's portrayal pales in comparison to the high tiers of akatsuki heck it pales in comparison to Orochimaru, who himself pales in comparison to Itachi.
Not to mention even featwise he doesn't belong there. So there really isn't a good argument for Kisame being an akatsuki high tier.
He's definitely above the ones in the med tier. That's why i said he's the weakest of the high tier
The med tier of the akatsuki for me is Kakuzu, Deidara and Sasori. Kisame is in the high tier with Itachi and Pain imo, ofc being the weakest of the tier.
High tier
Obito, Pain, and Itachi
Mid tier
Akatsuki Orochimaru, Kisame, Kakuzu, Deidara and Sasori
Low tier
Hidan, Konan and zetsu
High tier Obito, Pain, and Itachi Med tier Akatsuki Orochimaru, Kisame, Kakuzu, Deidara and Sasori Low tier Hidan, Konan and zetsu There will only ever be three top tiers, and low tiers. The rest will always be in the mid tier. Kisame is no exception. |