They're ups and downs. Cracker seems to have better attacking power, while Doffy might have better defense. Cracker vs Doffy might just be a question of can Doflamingo tank long enough to land a critical blow, or can Cracker overwhelm him enough to avoid getting hit.
The fact that that applies to everyone just makes it stranger that Cracker spent so much time talking about it.
Clearly cracker has no endurance in combat, that's why he hides behind his haki imbued biscuit armor. The way he talks about his sensitively to pain sounds like all Luffy needs to do to beat Cracker is to land a single punch on him. His sensitivity to pain is a weakness if anything.
This is a lot of salt just because people say something MIGHT be a POTENTIAL weakness PROBABLY. This is what this thread is for. Discussing things about the chapter. "Hey, maybe this thing in this chapter means this" is perfectly okay. Chill out.
I honestly believe he will beat cracker with high diff (not extreme diff like doffy again because there is no law damage componet as well as there is no option for luffy to use 2 gear 4ths because he doesn't have an entire town to defend him for ten minutes etc...)
They are of a similar level due to the endurance of Doffy but on an offensive or just plain strength cracker beats Doffy. I think cracker would likely win in a duel between him and Doffy. But if luffy takes him out you better be ready hear ppl saying that cracker is the vista of the big mom crew etc. luffy seems to get better with every fight and we are likely going to see that right now
Okay, and? No one's basing shit off of the scar, the prediction is because he spends so much time talking about how much he avoids pain and avoids direct hit.
Lmao replying like a real fanboy. Did Cracker hurt your feelings or something? I only mentioned a possibility. We know the background behind Sabo scar. We dontl't know the background behind Crackers but i noticed its important enough for him that he replicated the same even on his cookie soldiers. That implies a clear connection
This is Luffy getting cut.
Blunt strike stupid, did that not get across your head by now? Blunt and blunt strikes are two different meanings. Again, read the fucking post.
Says where?
You keep telling yourself that because no fan of luffy would say doffy actually cut through luffy's haki and law being superior than luffy overall.
Luffy in base was able to take Doflamingo's athlete foot.
Look at the wave of string, you can see the blood blotched onto it, indicating it cut Luffy.
The manga and I are saying the exact same thing: Luffy's Haki was susceptible to sharp-type attacks because it wasn't good enough yet.
What are you trying to prove here? Rebecca's sword couldn't cut Luffy's Haki because it's blunt. It produces a blunt strike, which Luffy's Haki can stand up against, not a sharp one. Rebecca's sword breaking against Luffy's head does NOT prove that his Haki is not vulnerable to sharp attacks because the sword isn't sharp.
Blood on the string.
Manga literally says "20 minutes later" on the very next page
Lol what? Because someone likes Luffy, they wouldn't say Doflamingo cut him even though the manga shows Doflamingo's strings having blood on them after hitting Luffy? That's called fanboyism. And when have I ever said Law was stronger than Luffy?
Increasing the quantity of Haki is not the same as increasing the quality of Haki.
Athlete actually cut Luffy
This just means that Cracker's sword strikes are stronger than Doflamingo's basic String attacks. However, Doflamingo's Awakened attacks are what were able to cut Luffy's Gear 4 body.
It's a post of Luffy saying, outright, "My Haki isn't good enough to stop sharp attacks." That means his Haki is susceptible to counts, period.
