[Discussion] Religion

[ComplexCity]

We bring up homosexual animals when someone tries to argue that homosexuality isn't natural. We don't use homosexual animals as an argument for homosexuality being good since we know that natural doesn't mean good (nothing wrong with homosexuality).

You're missing the point of my post (unsurprisingly). There's no need to defend that which you're ignorant too

 

[Punk Hazard]

She ignores people who pose a threat against her logic


I asked her does it make sense to follow all the things that animals do after one of her central arguments for homosexuality was that animals do it. I was then called a bigot and put on ignore

The animal argument isn't to say we should do it though

 

[ComplexCity]

The animal argument isn't to say we should do it though

.....And when I saw Riker's name appear in a thread he was done with pages ago, after seeing my name, that's when I knew....



OT: Again missing the point of my post (unsurprisingly)


Seems like you often try to take a jab certain members on here, RP section not servicing you well?

 

[Uzumaki Macho]

You're missing the point of my post (unsurprisingly). There's no need to defend that which you're ignorant too

Didn't care about the point of your post. I just wanted to point out what I said in my previous post.

 

[ComplexCity]

Didn't care about the point of your post. I just wanted to point out what I said in my previous post.

Which is irrelevant as there was no need for your input.... :|


I already know why liberals make that argument so you pretty much wasted my time reading that response. At least think of something constructive next time, something you seem to almost never do

 

[Punk Hazard]

.....And when I saw Riker's name appear in a thread he was done with pages ago, after seeing my name, that's when I knew....



OT: Again missing the point of my post (unsurprisingly)


Seems like you often try to take a jab certain members on here, RP section not servicing you well?

On the contrary, you failed to understand the point of my post, while I did yours. You're reprimanding her because she didn't provide an argument to your counterargument, and instead dismissed it. The point of my post is that she isn't really wrong to dismiss it because the premise of your argument is very faulty. The point of my post was that the flaw in what you said to her was so obvious, she's not at fault for not wasting time to explain it to you.

 

[ComplexCity]

On the contrary, you failed to understand the point of my post, while I did yours. You're reprimanding her because she didn't provide an argument to your counterargument, and instead dismissed it. The point of my post is that she isn't really wrong to dismiss it because the premise of your argument is very faulty. The point of my post was that the flaw in what you said to her was so obvious, she's not at fault for not wasting time to explain it to you.

So what I learned from a guy who selectively responds to certain posts that he wants to is that if someone feels your argument isn't making sense to them or feel that it's irrelevant based off your own observation, that it is ok to degrade them and put them on ignore because you don't like what they said. Quite the expected response



Like I told Macho, your post is irrelevant. That was one of many examples of it being done not just with that example which wasn't even my reasoning for posting it (her argument). Don't know why you think explaining to me what I already know makes your post any more relevant :lol

 

[Punk Hazard]

So what I learned from a guy who selectively responds to certain posts that he wants to is that if someone feels your argument isn't making sense to them or feel that it's irrelevant based off your own observation, that it is ok to degrade them and put them on ignore because you don't like what they said. Quite the expected response

I mean...yes. If she has no respect for your opinion based on observing your arguments, then why does she have to give you the time of day? You're basically saying "She read my arguments, disagreed with them, and doesn't respect me as a person based on the traits I've exhibited in their arguments. How dare she?" Get over yourself.

Like I told Macho, your post is irrelevant.

SEE?? This is the exact same thing you chastise KonanX for doing to you. You get irate that she dismisses your argument, and then you do the same to others. Really get over yourself.

 

[Narutobase Police]

I do not believe in God. I simply believe in the Law.

 

[ComplexCity]

I mean...yes. If she has no respect for your opinion based on observing your arguments, then why does she have to give you the time of day? You're basically saying "She read my arguments, disagreed with them, and doesn't respect me as a person based on the traits I've exhibited in their arguments. How dare she?" Get over yourself.

However ironically, even though she had me blocked and didn't like my arguments, she was responding them.

And very much in character, you sit here try to justify your argument while sounding like a hypocrite. Typical Riker

Per the example I gave, tell me, what did I say in the sentence that exhibited bigotry?

SEE?? This is the exact same thing you chastise KonanX for doing to you. You get irate that she dismisses your argument, and then you do the same to others. Really get over yourself.

She's had me blocked for half a year. Since when does calling her posts illogical and dropping a dislike result in me being irate? Idc if she does, I was just letting him know how she rolls. I barely come on CancerBase as it is. What benefit do I get for a member I don't care about ignoring my post?

 

[Punk Hazard]

And very much in character, you sit here try to justify your argument while sounding like a hypocrite. Typical Riker

What part of that specifically and precisely makes me a hypocrite?

Per the example I gave, tell me, what did I say in the sentence that exhibited bigotry?

I never said she was accurate in calling you a bigot. I said she was accurate in dismissing you. I'd have to see the post itself to decide if she was accurate or not, not just a summary.

She's had me blocked for half a year. Since when does calling her post illogical result in me being irate?

You're irate because of how much attention you're paying to the fact that she blocked you instead of arguing with you. If you didn't care, you obviously wouldn't be bringing it up in an argument 6 months later.

I barely come on CancerBase as it is.

Make this permanent and never.

What benefit do I get for a member I don't care about ignoring my post?

Which is exactly why you caring so much is so sad.

 

[ComplexCity]

What part of that specifically and precisely makes me a hypocrite?

The part where you said that people that don't have a proper rebuttal are poor debaters, yet sitting here attempting to justify her doing so. You're playing coy and selectively choosing when you wanna follow your words

I never said she was accurate in calling you a bigot. I said she was accurate in dismissing you. I'd have to see the post itself to decide if she was accurate or not, not just a summary.

:|

So why mention that her dismissing me based on the traits she observed (bigotry) if you aren't even going to stick with your original argument? Bold is irrelevant for previous reasons

You're irate because of how much attention you're paying to the fact that she blocked you instead of arguing with you. If you didn't care, you obviously wouldn't be bringing it up in an argument 6 months later.

So mentioning this one time currently results in me being irate? So by your logic, whenever another members is brought up from previous debates, then they too are irate? Flawless logic Riker, flawless logic

Make this permanent and never

Depends on how much more cancerous your and other members responses are

Which is exactly why you caring so much is so sad.

Except I don't can't see how you're so bored that you're trying to justify how I'm feeling. No need to play the white knight

 

[Punk Hazard]

The part where you say that people that don't have a proper rebuttal are poor debaters, yet sitting justifying her doing so. You're playing coy and selectively choosing when you wanna follow your words

Yes. People who are incapable of making a reply when they want to are not good debaters. This, however, isn't the same as a person who IS capable of forming a reply, and chooses not to post it because they find that it's not worth it. KonanX is the latter, not the former.

:|

So why mentioning that her dismissing based on the traits she observed (bigotry) if aren't even going to stick with your original argument? Bold is irrelevant for previous reasons

I never said anything about bigotry specifically. I said the concept of dismissing someone's argument because it gives you reason not to respect them is valid. Like I said, if you want me to address bigotry, C/P the exact posts in their entirety.

So mentioning this one time currently results in me being irate? So by your logic, whenever another members is brought up from previous debates, then they too are irate? Flawless logic Riker, flawless logic

You clearly are, as you're lashing out towards her, me, and Uchiha Macho about it. You're going out of your way to be unnecessarily berating, so yeah, by all indications, you do care. Especially if it happened six whole months ago, and you're bringing it up again in a separate thread.

Except I don't can't see how you're so bored that you're trying to justify how I'm feeling. No need to play the white knight

No one is playing white knight. I didn't even know who you were beefing with when I replied.

 

[Sex]

She's had me blocked for half a year. Since when does calling her posts illogical and dropping a dislike result in me being irate? Idc if she does, I was just letting him know how she rolls. I barely come on CancerBase as it is. What benefit do I get for a member I don't care about ignoring my post?

>blocked
>1/2 year
>arguing about it
>not irate

I dunno. Sounds to me like you're the type who doesn't take rejection well.

OT: Been looking into Jashinism... seems gr8, but not too sure about immortality.

 

[ComplexCity]

Cancer levels reaching 90% threshold. This will be my last response

Yes. People who are incapable of making a reply when they want to are not good debaters. This, however, isn't the same as a person who IS capable of forming a reply, and chooses not to post it because they find that it's not worth it. KonanX is the latter, not the former.

It seems the strawman of the day is to explain things that don't require an explanation. You'll group people who fit into the latter category into the former based off what you deem what they should able to able to be respondeing to. Once again, your post makes zero sense, there were people replying with what she identifies as bigotry and was yet was replying to those members. She had me on ignore, yet was replying to some of my post as well as mentioning my name as well (Based off your logic she must have been irate at the time to bring up arguments from previous debates, but knowing the white knight you are, you'll find a way to justify this). So it doesn't matter how you spin it, you're a hypocrite and she's a poor debater based off your logic

INB4: You try to justify "oh she doesn't respect you, but Im gonna try and justify her debating other people that had similar arguments that you had ComplexCity"

I never said anything about bigotry specifically.

I mean...yes. If she has no respect for your opinion based on observing your arguments.

Which she said were bigoted, don't say this and then change your answer when you aren't making any sense. Doesn't do anything for you being fickle

I said the concept of dismissing someone's argument because it gives you reason not to respect them is valid. Like I said, if you want me to address bigotry, C/P the exact posts in their entirety.

Not wasting my time, because you're making a mold hill into a mountain when no one even asked for your input (INB4 this is a public forum).

You clearly are, as you're lashing out towards her, me, and Uchiha Macho about it. You're going out of your way to be unnecessarily berating, so yeah, by all indications, you do care. Especially if it happened six whole months ago, and you're bringing it up again in a separate thread

Calling your post irrelevant is lashing out? I see

So I guess your irate when you say "I remember when """" memeber said this." Glad to know where all that white knight fervor comes from

No one is playing white knight. I didn't even know who you were beefing with when I replied.

White Knight
A person (usually a male) who sees the typical maiden in distress, and believes that he can help her. A male version of the "mother figure" that some girls become.


Yet you quoted me when I clearly said "she"
Doesn't matter who it was for and no one was beefing that's how your bias brain interpreted it

>blocked
>1/2 year
>arguing about it
>not irate

I dunno. Sounds to me like you're the type who doesn't take rejection well.

I'm not understanding your logic (as well as from the previous thread so I'm not really getting my hopes up here). I'm not the one who brought up being irate. A couple members missed the point of my post as it was relevant to what the member(s) I was replying to at the time. The person currently responding to me now, didn't even read the previous member(s) post I replied to. That's why he's under the assumption that I am irate because he is ignorant to what was previously being discussed. By all means though, if you want to be a Rugrat and hop on the bandwagon, by all means do so

 

[Sex]

I'm not understanding your logic (as well as from the previous thread so I'm not really getting my hopes up here). I'm not the one who brought being irate. A couple members missed the point of my post as it was relevant to what the member(s) I was replying to at the time. The person currently responding to me now, didn't even read the previous member(s) post I replied to. That's why he's under the assumption that I am irate because he is ignorant to what was previously being discussed. By all means though, if you want to be a Rugrat and hop on the bandwagon, by all means do so

Judging from the current argument you're having with Oreo... I'm not surprised you don't understand my logic. But it just seems like you're a bit frustrated by your word usage, sentence structure, and your inability to control yourself from further escalating the argument.

Correct me if I'm wrong, though.

 

[Punk Hazard]

>blocked
>1/2 year
>arguing about it
>not irate

I dunno. Sounds to me like you're the type who doesn't take rejection well.

OT: Been looking into Jashinism... seems gr8, but not too sure about immortality.

Exactly. Cuz we all cling to stuff that we don't care about

 

[ComplexCity]

Judging from the current argument you're having with Oreo

Except it's not an argument, I'm just trying to show him the error of his ways, however, you can't teach a blind man how to "see" his mistakes. He just likes to argue for the sake of being contrary to others who don't believe what he does (only with certain members like myself)

I'm not surprised you don't understand my logic.

In this thread or the other? Because neither are coherent when I just explained to you that I didn't bring up her name out of any negative feeling

But it just seems like you're a bit frustrated by your word usage, sentence structure,

I'm just sarcastic so it might come off that way. No one on here has the power to make me feel negative emotion, in fact it's quite the opposite

and your inability to control yourself from further escalating the argument

[Again, not making any sense, there is a person here trying to tell me how I feel and when I explain myself I am escalating the issue?

Correct me if I'm wrong, though.

You have no idea

 

[Sex]

Except it's not an argument, I'm just trying to show him the error of his ways, however, you can't teach a blind man how to "see" his mistakes. He just likes to argue for the sake of being contrary to others who don't believe what he does (only with certain members like myself)



In this thread or the other? Because neither are coherent when I just explained to you that I didn't bring up her name out of any negative feeling



I'm just sarcastic so it might come off that way. No one on here has the power to make me feel negative emotion, in fact it's quite the opposite



[Again, not making any sense, there is a person here trying to tell me how I feel and when I explain myself I am escalating the issue?



You have no idea

I post in a lot of threads so I have no idea, buddy. But I'm surprised you would waste two hours of your life trying to teach a blind man to see his mistakes. Kudos to you.

Definitely not irate.

 

[ComplexCity]

I post in a lot of threads so I have no idea, buddy. But I'm surprised you would waste two hours of your life trying to teach a blind man to see his mistakes. Kudos to you.

Definitely not irate.

Not a waste when I am able to multitask and do other things while I wait for my notification to increase a count. Still not seeing how that's irate