Do women have to cry for money tho?
I mean men have to pull off a Sasuke and and run from Child Support XD
Gurl done fuked up her life if he said no but she continued :bdpf:
Pull a sasuke but you should not return lmao
Do women have to cry for money tho?
I mean men have to pull off a Sasuke and and run from Child Support XD
Abortion during the first trimester isn't murder. However, it is the prevention of developing life. You can argue abortion is bad, but not because it's murder. Before a certain point, abortion simply isn't murder.Abortion should be illegal, and I'm happy in most countries is illegal. There should be no conservative or democratic political leaning to this subject. Abortion is murder, and one who murders deserves to be murdered. It doesn't take a political divide for God sake.
Imagine all the children with only one parent for support though.I think that if the mother decides to keep the child, the father should have the option to pay child support or not instead of being forced to pay it.
This says it all.The father doesn't even have to suffer; his contributions are a few seconds; and even they're pleasurable.
Nothing compared to the months of strain that the mother has to go through, using her own body. The father has the right to state his opinion, but the final decision rests with the mother. Anyone who says otherwise is jejune.
Not to mention that a foetus is just a cluster of cells devoid of the ability to think, feel or experience. It's not sentient until after the point of which abortion is not a legal option.
He's wrong though. The father also has to support the mother during pregnancy, so he doesn't do zero percent of anything. 18 years of raising a child>>>>>>9 months of carrying one, so the father taking on the strain of raising the child immediately outweighs the strain the mother may face during pregnancy.This says it all.
So, no. The mother's word is the important one.
What the **** is this blatant sexism in the 21st century doing on the internetHe's wrong though. The father also has to support the mother during pregnancy, so he doesn't do zero percent of anything. 18 years of raising a child>>>>>>9 months of carrying one, so the father taking on the strain of raising the child immediately outweighs the strain the mother may face during pregnancy.
All what you said is a compilation of what if scenarios, what if they don't play out, what do you say then? If the dad has little to no rights, Why must he pay child support then? Why give a damn about a kid at all?If you had read it, you would know that my argument started with this premise and showed that it doesn't work.
Well I don't think there is a right answer, at least not one I can come up with.Imagine all the children with only one parent for support though.
Abortion during the first trimester isn't murder. However, it is the prevention of developing life. You can argue abortion is bad, but not because it's murder. Before a certain point, abortion simply isn't murder.
Abortion also shouldn't be illegal. Even though I believe abortion is morally wrong, I'm pro-choice because you can't run completely on morals. You need pragmatism, you need to be realistic. Prohibition hardly works. It's happened with alcohol and, historically, it's happened with abortion.
Historically, when abortions are made illegal, it doesn't eliminate them. It just means women get more desperate and turn to more extreme methods that usually end up in death, illness and deformities. Making abortions illegal is more detrimental than progressive.
He didn't mean that.. he basically meant what if the father doesn't want to spend money on that baby he has to have an equal say since he's gonna pay for it's shelter, nutrition and education, not only that but he'll have to take care of it, feed it, discipline it, change it's diapers..etc. If the mother wants it then fine but the father shouldn't have a hand in it.What the **** is this blatant sexism in the 21st century doing on the internet
As in, why wouldn't both parents be contributing to raising this kid; additionally, if the mother is having a kid without the father's consent, or isn't doing so, why does the father's say outweigh the mother's based solely on the concept that he might have a job
The mother would still be doing things, in this traditional sexist mindset, such as actually taking care of the kid at home
But in the West this assumed state of affairs is outmoded even if still significantly present
So what is this
non-binary genders.Why did Nature not add a third gender to solve this paradox ?