In most organisms adapted to group living, inter-group wars are biologically normal.
Not that homosexuality is comparable, the point is that the argument is special pleading unless you can furnish a case as to why we should give homosexuality normative sanction based on its naturalness.
Additionally, aversion to homosexuality until recently has been the rule in most cultures and societies, the west included - as usual, liberals like to point out the commonalities between different people except when it comes to cultural universals that do not accord with their agenda.
The problem isn't so much people of the same *** going about their private lives as they want as that gay-marriage is often advanced as part of a complete package that includes the rest of the decadent leftist values - thoughtcrime laws that criminalize 'hate speech' about them, the normalization of sexual promiscuity and the erosion of the family unit more generally.
Chinese culture - my girlfriend is Chinese and I practically live within the Chinese community in England these days - is one of the most family oriented that I know of. Likewise fidelity in relationships and marriage are still esteemed as core virtues while sexual promiscuity is openly contemned as a vice.
The Chinese people understand very well that promoting homosexuality will entail accepting more and more parts if not the whole package of that accelerant of cultural, national and indeed, civilizational, suicide known as the 'sexual revolution.'
