I think the definition of racism didn't mean physical characteristics, obviously other races have different characteristics physically.
One example, skin colour. :sdo:
Now how does having a nose that's adapted to the cold, or the savanna equate to inequality? They're both just adaptations to the environment.
It's outright false to say one race is smarter than the other as all have been shown to do well given the same opportunities. So what is there that's unequal?
The definition of racism that I think you were referring was "the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races".
So even if it was addressing physical characteristics, it shows that there are different levels of racism when it says especially so.
So yeah, maybe everyone is racist to an extent, but we still have a limit that's socially acceptable. The line for me is the bold and that's what you cross.
Do you even know how we divide power in today's globalized world? You're always talking as if only one race can be on top. That's idiotic as we don't even use a system that revolves around race. It's nothing more than a dumb gang mentality.
