Weevil came to mind before I even clicked on this. Come one God Usopp. Use your lies to covert this idiot to the dark side.
For his age and experience. Like, someone can say technically that the baby of the woman from Luffy's home (can't remember her name atm) is the dumbest character cuz it's a baby. But, intelligence is relative. You know, the baby could be smart for its age. Meanwhile, Luffy is much more stupid for his age than pretty much anyone else.What do you mean by relatively?
Well in that case, wouldn't Weevil still be the dumbest since he's dumber than Luffy and older?For his age and experience. Like, someone can say technically that the baby of the woman from Luffy's home (can't remember her name atm) is the dumbest character cuz it's a baby. But, intelligence is relative. You know, the baby could be smart for its age. Meanwhile, Luffy is much more stupid for his age than pretty much anyone else.
Because he couldn't tell a mirror from a picture? That's hardly the dumbest thing we've seen in the series. Luffy thought that north was whichever direction feels cold. Luffy can't tell Sogeking and Usopp apart. He thought pouring sake into Zoro's mouth would heal his wounds because Zoro likes sake. He literally said thinking too much(he was thinking for like 7 seconds) made him physically ill.Well in that case, wouldn't Weevil still be the dumbest since he's dumber than Luffy and older?
i think i concur,its just so funnyI'd say Batelomeo, dude did not even get a navigator, him getting this far is a miracle
Incorrect analysis; by the very definition of intelligence being efficiency of integrating and processing information that statement is redundant. A 5 year old doing algebra isn't smart for his age, he's a genius absolutely.For his age and experience. Like, someone can say technically that the baby of the woman from Luffy's home (can't remember her name atm) is the dumbest character cuz it's a baby. But, intelligence is relative. You know, the baby could be smart for its age. Meanwhile, Luffy is much more stupid for his age than pretty much anyone else.
Fam what the hell are you talking about?Incorrect analysis; by the very definition of intelligence being efficiency of integrating and processing information that statement is redundant. A 5 year old doing algebra isn't smart for his age, he's a genius absolutely.
Intelligence by definition is a priori relative; in psychology it's mental age divided by chronological age times 100. To say intelligence relative to ones age is like saying velocity relative to time to talk about how fast one isFam what the hell are you talking about?