Faith is one of the world's great evils

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hawker

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Apr 7, 2011
Messages
3,829
Kin
5💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Faith means believing something without scientific evidence or proof. Because if you believe something without that, then that justifies anything. You are no longer vulnerable to somebody coming back at you and saying: hang on a minute let me argue the case. If you believe it without scientific evidence or proof which is what faith is, then you don't argue the case. You say no, I'm not arguing the case. This is my faith, it is mine, it is private, I don't descent from it, I don't retreat from it. You are just going go have to accept that. <---- tell me which religion doesn't demand that kind of faith from it's supporters.



noun
1.
confidence or trust in a person or thing:
faith in another's ability.
2.
belief that is not based on proof:

He had faith that the hypothesis would be substantiated by fact.
3.
belief in God or in the doctrines or teachings of religion:
the firm faith of the Pilgrims.
4.
belief in anything, as a code of ethics, standards of merit, etc.:
to be of the same faith with someone concerning honesty.
5.
a system of religious belief:
the Christian faith; the Jewish faith.



1.Faith is an assertion of unreasonable conviction, which is assumed without reason, and defended against all reason.
Assumed without reason meaning most muslims and christians are born that whey. They are just products of their culture. Like Richard Dawkins says: you happened to be brought up in the Christian faith. You know what it's like to not believe in a particular faith because you're not a Muslim. You're not a Hindu. Why aren't you a Hindu? Because you happen to have been brought up in America, not in India. If you had of been brought up in India, you'd be a Hindu. If you had been brought up in Denmark in the time of the Vikings you'd be believing in Wotan and Thor. If you were brought up in classical Greece you'd be believing in, in Zeus. If you were brought up in central Africa you'd be believing in the great Juju up the mountain. There's no particular reason to pick on the Judeo-Christian god, in which by the sheerest accident you happen to have been brought up. So why so confident in your faith?


2. Faith has never answered anything of significance.
Or has it? Tell me an example if you think it has. I can tell you what science has answered. The advantage of science is that new evidence changes ideas, allowing the advancement of human knowledge, something religion does not allow.

3. Faith has caused more bad things than good:
For example when it comes to Catholic church here are some of their accomplishments:
Crusades, inquisition, the persecution of the jewish people, injustice towards women (that's half of the population righ there) and the force conversion of indigenious people, especially in South-America, African slave trade. They've institutionalized the raping of children.

Then there's the case of Islam: terrorism, sharia law, genitale mutilation (90% of Egyptian women have had their genitals mutilated), stoning of homosexuals and unfaithful wifes, oppression of women.

Now compare those with the achievements of science. Lightbulp. Electricity. Vaccines. Phone. Computers. Medication. Organ transplants. Prosthate legs. Condoms.

4. Faith as in religion instills warped morality into people. Their morales come from the book or the teachings of their religion. Thus they don't do things based on rationalisation, but based on the fear of god. They fear they go to hell or heaven. That is inherently warped.
For example the holy books of christianity have examples of this warped morality: Old Testament instructs believers to kill any friend or family member who favours serving other gods, and Numbers 31 where Moses, angered at the mercy his victorious forces show in taking women and children captive, instructs them to kill all save virgin girls, who are to be taken as slaves.
New testament: St Paul's nasty sadomasochistic doctrine that Jesus had to be hideously tortured and killed so that we might be redeemed – the doctrine of atonement for original sin – and asks "if God wanted to forgive our sins, why not just forgive them? Who is God trying to impress?" He says that modern science demonstrates that the alleged perpetrators Adam and Eve never even existed, undermining St Paul's doctrine."

5. Faith is the process of non-thinking which is not a way of understanding the world, but instead stands in fundamental opposition to modern science and the scientific method, and is divisive and dangerous. cience involves a process of constantly testing and revising theories in the light of new evidence, while faith makes a virtue out of believing unprovable and often improbable propositions. For an example of faith, the infallible doctrine of the Assumption, which Pope Pius XII declared in 1950 by relying upon tradition. When contrasted this with science, which works as a system whereby working assumptions may be falsified by recourse to reason and evidence.
Examples from most familiar scriptures from western society:

-John 20:29 “how blessed are they who have not seen but yet believe.”
-Romans 14:22 “The faith which you have, have as your own conviction-”
-2 Corinthians 4:18 “We look not at things seen, but at things not seen.”
-2 Corinthians 5:7 “for we walk by faith, not by sight.”
-Hebrews 11:1 “Now faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen.”
-Romans 1:20 “the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood from the things that are made.”

6. Faith at it's core is surrendering. It is the surrender of the mind, it's the surrender of reason, it's the surrender of the only thing that makes us different from other animals. It's our need to believe and to surrender our skepticism and our reason, our yearning to discard that and put all our trust or faith in someone or something, that is the sinister thing to me. Out of all the virtues, all the supposed virtues, faith must be the most overrated

7. Faith is literally a matter of make-believe, convincing yourself of whatever you want to believe. That’s why the faithful have a practice to ‘reaffirm’ their faith. Faith is neither virtuous nor moral; it’s a matter of self-deception and manipulation of the masses. It is already dishonest to assert as fact that which is not evidently true, but that’s what all religions do. Worse, they also post a statement of faith wherein they admit, (as if this were something to be proud of) that they will automatically and thoughtlessly reject any and all evidence that seems to challenge their preconceived notions, which must be defended a-priori. Because of this, faith is fundamentally fallacious and inherently dishonest. An example of this is homosexual marriages. It's a well known fact that all muslims think of it as a sin. They won't allow it. Many christians won't allow gay marriages because it's not "how god intended it".
Homosexual marriages have been over and over again rationally argued to something that gays should have the right to have. There's no logical way to deny it. Gay parents have been proven to be as safe and good if not even better than heterosexual parents. Even the National psychiatric organisation in US agrees with this. Same with the National Psychologist Association in Finland. It's the consensus all over the world. Yet Christians object it due to their faith. Not to talk about muslims who are even further behind in progress.

8. Faith has always only ever served to impede, retard, or reverse progress in whatever socio-political medical, educational, economic or environmental application it has ever touched.

9.If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can’t be taken on its own merits.

10. Religion demands faith when it proposes impossible and irrational thoughs as real. For example Christian creed:
To live unto the Law, is to die unto God. To die unto the Law, is to live unto God. These two propositions go against reason.When we pay attention to reason, God seems to propose impossible matters in the Christian Creed. To reason it seems absurd that Christ should offer His body and blood in the Lord’s Supper; that Baptism should be the washing of regeneration; that the dead shall rise; that Christ the Son of God was conceived in the womb of the Virgin Mary, etc. Reason shouts that all this is preposterous.



That is unreasonable, and it’s unscientific.
That is the definition of blind faith;
I believe something even though
there is no evidence to support it
.”
-creationist, Kirk Cameron
of Living Waters Ministries



Who here thinks that faith is the source for good?
 
Last edited:

Illuminater

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Dec 31, 2015
Messages
3,695
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
I agree, Religion is a curse to the human race. It hasn't caused us to progress but it limits us to staying on this planet. Religion isn't needed to preserve the human race, but morals are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UltraPain

Gerkak

Active member
Legendary
Joined
Apr 11, 2012
Messages
16,382
Kin
67💸
Kumi
18💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
Faith : complete trust or confidence in someone or something.

I suppose we should stop having faith in political leaders, scientists etc. Faith is not the problem, the problem is humans who choose to create harmful beliefs. Faith on it's own can be anything an example is saying I have faith that in 10 years a cure for HIV will be found, there isn't anything wrong with that.

Faith is a non physical abstract concept, it has no voice or opinion, humans are the ones who create and use faiths for their own benefit whether to cause harm or give themselves peace of mind. To say faith on it's own is bad makes no sense.

Religion and faith are not the same thing. Humans are fond of not accepting blame to the point that they foolishly blame something that can't speak for itself nor exists as a living thing for their actions. How silly.
 
Last edited:

TenseiganFTW

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Apr 6, 2015
Messages
3,892
Kin
229💸
Kumi
39💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
"Faith is literally a matter of make-believe"

This sounds more subjective on your part.
Naruto:believe it!
Sakura:I wont believe.
Naruto:Sorry Sakura I'm gonna kill you
Sakura:Why
Naruto:Becuase you are an unbeliever.
Sakura:ugh,fu cking extremist...

Can't take his bait serious anymore.His threads are filled with such things.
 

Dark Sonic

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Jul 21, 2015
Messages
3,208
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
Naruto:believe it!
Sakura:I wont believe.
Naruto:Sorry Sakura I'm gonna kill you
Sakura:Why
Naruto:Becuase you are an unbeliever.
Sakura:ugh,fu cking extremist...

Can't take his bait serious anymore.His threads are filled with such things.
I'm just posting what I post. This is literally on his side and his opinion on how he INTERPRETS the word Faith.
 

Aim64C

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Dec 18, 2012
Messages
3,681
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
Faith is an inescapable fact of life as a sentient being.

Even if we reduce the world to scientific facts - we end up at the world of Quantum Mechanics, where we can experimentally verify that properties such as the spin state of a photon do not exist until the moment a spin state is required to be given by the photon. This brings us to the concept of the superposition and the issue of entangled systems (which has, also, been experimentally verified to be the phenomenon responsible for 'time' - which is something a few of us have speculated would be the cause before the experiments verified it).

Thus - objective reality and time are both things that do not persist outside of set contexts where they are necessary to exist. Thus - at some point - the assumption that the world is a persistent and objective reality that continues indefinitely is contradicted by all present experiments into the nature of quantum mechanics - the behavior that underpin every interaction that comprises material reality.

Thus, we are again cast into a situation where we must look at life philosophically.

Everyone has a philosophy with regards to life, whether they consciously accept one or just act in accordance with one. Faith is part of that.

Where science and logic can govern the empirical measurements with regard to reality - faith is what underpins our assumptions about what value those measurements have. For example - many 'humanists' along the lines of Dawkins would insist that war is a bad thing - loss of life is bad. The death penalty is bad and unbecoming of intelligent beings. Numerous other things along those lines.

I argue that war is a natural phase that may not be pleasant, but is a necessary step to take for nations and populations when the circumstances are ripe for it. Likewise - I argue that the death penalty is another unpleasant necessity within the world - and would even argue that it is less cruel than the notion that you can 'save' a man's life by locking him in a cage (a 'zoo of misbehavior') because you deem it too uncivilized to kill someone and can never truly know if he 'deserves' death (but you can determine when he can't step outside, interact with others, etc).

Thus, we have a conflict of visions - a conflict of what we view as being proper and improper... and, in many ways, we can only accept many of these things on faith. Even when viewing things through the lens of history - our lives are brief and the records of history incomplete. At some point, we have to take our sense of ethics and morality upon faith - regardless of whether we credit them to a God, to Historical Review, to our own innate wisdom, or some combination of those.
 

Your Creepy Stalker

Active member
Legendary
Joined
Oct 21, 2012
Messages
15,925
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
Faith : complete trust or confidence in someone or something.

I suppose we should stop having faith in political leaders, scientists etc. Faith is not the problem, the problem is humans who choose to create harmful beliefs. Faith on it's own can be anything an example is saying I have faith that in 10 years a cure for HIV will be found, there isn't anything wrong with that.

Faith is a non physical abstract concept, it has no voice or opinion, humans are the ones who create and use faiths for their own benefit whether to cause harm or give themselves a peace of mind. To say faith on it's own is bad makes no sense.

Religion and faith are not the same thing. Humans are fond of not accepting blame to the point that they foolishly blame something that can't speak for itself nor exists as a living thing for their actions. This is no different from saying a volcano erupted because it was angry at the animals, plants and humans living in an area, how silly.
The difference between faith in a deity, and faith in, EG, Politicians, is that i know the politician exists. I know that the politician is trustworthy (Or he's Donald Trump). I don't know that a deity exists. I can't know that the deity is worth trusting if i don't know it exists.

Also, if you had actually read the OP, you would see that he provides multiple definitons of "Faith". You are looking at the fourth one, the OP is looking at the second one. By claiming that "Faith" always has both meanings, you are strawmanning the argument.
 
Last edited:

Scooby Doo

Active member
Immortal
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
45,490
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
The difference between faith in a deity, and faith in, EG, Politicians, is that i know the politician exists. I know that the politician is trustworthy (Or he's Donald Trump). I don't know that a deity exists. I can't know that the deity is worth trusting if i don't know it exists.

Also, if you had actually read the OP, you would see that he provides multiple definitons of "Faith". You are looking at the fourth one, the OP is looking at the second one. By claiming that "Faith" always has both meanings, you are strawmanning the argument.
And yet OP fails at the first sentence. In which he gives a definition, which actually is not the same as the 2nd definition given in the dictionary. Proof =/= evidence.
 

Gerkak

Active member
Legendary
Joined
Apr 11, 2012
Messages
16,382
Kin
67💸
Kumi
18💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
The difference between faith in a deity, and faith in, EG, Politicians, is that i know the politician exists. I know that the politician is trustworthy (Or he's Donald Trump). I don't know that a deity exists. I can't know that the deity is worth trusting if i don't know it exists.
What about faith in hypothetical particles and such? These are things that no one can prove exists yet a lot of scientists and their ordinary followers swallow it up. The scientists preach it like priests and invoke it like a god and they call on their prophets who are those who theorized said hypothetical objects. Do you see the similarities. Faith is not the problem I am not concerned about what someone chooses to believe in, what I am concerned about is if that person tries to exercise their beliefs on those that aren't concerned with them.

Also, if you had actually read the OP, you would see that he provides multiple definitons of "Faith". You are looking at the fourth one, the OP is looking at the second one. By claiming that "Faith" always has both meanings, you are strawmanning the argument.
It doesn't matter to me which one he chooses to pick, even by looking at the definition he chooses to view it means that he doesn't believe in anything that he can't individually and independently verify. That means he doesn't believe in say electrons. Even if he were to say there is evidence for their existence he can't verify it himself he would have to trust what he is told in school, on TV or anywhere else. In other words he has faith in those who tell him this is true. Those who have religions also were taught that what they believe in is true by existing individuals there is no difference here.
 
Last edited:

Scooby Doo

Active member
Immortal
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
45,490
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
In my language proof and evidence are the same word. But again. Semantics.
And? Then use a Finnish dictionary and debate with Finnish people on a Finnish forum. There is a reason why we have dictionaries. Also, even if the word is the same in a language -as they are also the same in my language-, the meanings they cover may differ according to the context. I'm quite sure that even in your language you can grasp the difference between something that supports an assertion (evidence in English) and something that shows beyond doubt that the assertion is a fact (proof). If you can't adopt to the differences in another language due to your cognitive limits, then you shouldn't call others names. Your definitions of the word have been inconsistent, until you fix that, all debate is pointless.
 

Hawker

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Apr 7, 2011
Messages
3,829
Kin
5💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
And? Then use a Finnish dictionary and debate with Finnish people on a Finnish forum. There is a reason why we have dictionaries. Also, even if the word is the same in a language -as they are also the same in my language-, the meanings they cover may differ according to the context. I'm quite sure that even in your language you can grasp the difference between something that supports an assertion (evidence in English) and something that shows beyond doubt that the assertion is a fact (proof). If you can't adopt to the differences in another language due to your cognitive limits, then you shouldn't call others names. Your definitions of the word have been inconsistent, until you fix that, all debate is pointless.
It doesn't matter. Faith doesn't involve either of them. Proof nor evidence. That's why you are wrong to focus on semantics when what I wrote truly reflects my points.

I know the difference of those words, but in this context using the word evidence for example is enough.

The dictionary goes on a little further and I accept that also.
 

TimothyTheTomato

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Mar 9, 2014
Messages
2,896
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
I agree, Religion is a curse to the human race. It hasn't caused us to progress but it limits us to staying on this planet. Religion isn't needed to preserve the human race, but morals are.
So if everybody were athiests more ppl would donatr to NASA and wed have found another habitable planet.
Bullshit
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top