I was simply pointing out that any sexual relationship can cause harm wasn't singling out Genetic mutations specifically.
Education.
People know the risks involved they can take precautions to prevent such risks, Same as homosexuals do.
Can Child Dolls Keep Pedophiles from Offending?
- Thread starter Melanin
- Start date
People know the risks involved they can take precautions to prevent such risks, Same as homosexuals do.
Well I guess you have a point there.
But it's still far fetched. What kind of harm are you talking about when normal healthy un-related people are having *** and ultimately children? Can it be compared to this:
"A common justification for prohibiting incest is avoiding inbreeding: a collection of genetic disorders suffered by the children of parents with a close genetic relationship. Such children are at greater risk for congenital disorders, death, and developmental and physical disability, and that risk is inversely proportional to their parents' coefficient of relationship—a measure of how close the parents are related genetically.
Children of parent-child or sibling-sibling unions are at increased risk compared to cousin-cousin unions. Studies suggest that 20-36% of these children will die or have major disability due to the inbreeding.[9] A study of 29 offspring resulting from brother-sister or father-daughter incest found that 20 had congenital abnormalities, including four directly attributable to autosomal recessive alleles"
You must be registered for see links
You must be registered for see links
Lelouch Vii Britannia
Active member
Awards
Your so dumb lmao. I told you there is and all you have to do is look them up
Im trying to prove you worng not legalize incest
Frankenstein
Active member
Awards
Lelouch Vii Britannia
Active member
Awards
Im not telling to provide the evidence, just see the evidence
Okay now your trolling .
I realize i would not be able to convince brainwashed indviduals so i'll drop this for now
Oh yeah without a doubt incestuous couples face far greater risks and risks for a healthy heterosexual couple are far fewer
But i wasn't talking about just Healthy heterosexual couples, As not all heterosexual couples are Healthy, Not all go for regular checks, Have protected *** with people they know are clean/safe and so on and thats where the risks lay in terms of heterosexual ***.
Frankenstein
Active member
Awards
Natsu Shazneel
Banned
Awards
That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.
Therefore what you say is just not true. Don't let the door hit you on the way out of this thread.
Sure, but what is it that you are suggesting? Seems to me that banning heterosexual *** would not be an option as we need *** to reproduce. Nor would it work in reality. It's far more easy to ban incest as it's not common and people generally think it's wrong.
Last edited:
I'm just saying, because it comes with Risks doesn't mean it needs to be banned.
Any kind of *** comes with potential risks (granted some more than others) just be smart and always take precautions, Then there shouldn't be a problems with any potential harmful effects.
People said the exact same thing about homosexuality not so long ago and some still do.
Just ban incestuous couples from having children, Then as long as they follow the law, They are consenting adults causing no harm.
Natsu Shazneel
Banned
Awards
Dark Sonic
Active member
Awards
And what happens when some accidentally or intentionally gets pregnant? Forced abortion?
I get your point but I'm really not sure how I feel about this. Basically they are two consenting adults and basically they are from one ejaculation away from killing and harming the health of a soon to born child.
Power Bottom
Active member
Awards
Then yes, Those that would refuse or intentionally get pregnant would most likely of had the child with or without incest being banned in the first place.
At least with such a law acceptance would grow, Thus lead to more support for said couples that find themselves in a tough situation.
It can never be 100% safe and if it is illegal or not to practice incest it will happen and pregnancies will continue, It's better to monitor it with support/advice groups instead of pushing it underground
even if it just helps to stop a handful of incestuous pregnancies/births a year.
Forced abortion itself raises awhole lot of other questions. Can someone be forced to have an abortion? It doesn't fit into a free liberal democrasy.
Acceptance would grow? Why would the acceptance need to grow? It would ultimately increase the amount of incest couples, thus inbreed babies.
One point of view is that if we accept incest we will accept the reality that genetic defects will increase and our genepool will weaken in quality. Inbred pregnancies would definitely increase and that is not a good thing for human race.
Just look at gypsies. Do you have gypsy migrants in your country? Incest is fairly common in their communities. Especially when they are in someone else's country where they are a minority. They only reproduce with themselves. And they aren't the most brightest people in the world. Their unemployment rate is 50%. The remaining 50% are children and elderly.
So no I really can't agree with you on this. I don't think accepting incest leads to anything good. On the contrary. And I don't think we are in a position to monitor or force stop anyone's pregnancies, thus banning pregnancies would not work. I guess we have to agree to disagree.
