You're asking me for evidence that they attend the school when you are the one who is questioning it in the first place. Why don't you find the evidence and get back to me on it?
There is no reason to believe any of these people are students of the university.
In fact, the only people interviewed by the media were two students and a couple alumni who are no longer students at the campus.
If it's so obvious where is your proof.
Right next to yours.
You don't understand that the burden of proof applies equally to either claim. Any student who makes the claim that he or she is part of the student body must be able to provide proof of it. Their mere presence during a protest is not sufficient evidence.
And how is that working for him? He has a little over a year left. I don't even see how you think this is possible because the moment anyone mentions anything Islam people grab their guns; and in your case your neck-snapping boots.
This is not a discussion between the two of us, but a contest over the minds of people at large.
The phrase "the world is not enough" has meaning in the discussion of an individual like Obama. One does not need to be the President in order to end up dictating over America. This also has to be interpreted within the globalist mindset/model/agenda, under which nations are merely governing districts within a much larger international government that has regulatory power over nations.
When your goal is to destroy America as a global superpower, the globalist associated reasoning is that America must be reduced in its influence so as to be subject to an international regulatory committee that will ultimately hold the purse strings of the world economy. For someone like Obama - he would consider it the highest honor and, indeed, his duty, to take up responsibility for overseeing the 'transformation' of America into a subservient state of the global government.
Or, at least, that it was not able to contest the dominion of such a global government. America is not likely to so easily roll over and accept an international government - but, at the same time, even if America is not compliant, it can be effectively neutralized long enough for those who hold the cards to dictate the game to a re-emerging American presence.
Within this type of objective - five years is relatively short-term thinking - although the transition accelerates exponentially, so it reaches a point where change occurs quite rapidly and abruptly with seemingly little warning to those who have not been paying attention to the pattern.
I'm not responding to the rest of what you wrote above because of the raw amount of conjecture. You're connecting dots that don't exist except in the minds of the delusional.
When it finally comes time for me to do something about this, I will live stream the interrogations with the IDs found on them at the time prior to their execution. Assuming such resources are available.
Either way - records will be kept of who was detained and what their final deposition was.
I also already told you how retarded you are for taking issue to what Farrakhan said about the 10,000 fearless men. Patrick Henry said the exact same thing, but since it had no Islam in it he's a patriot and a founding father. The US practices the exact same principles you slander Farrakhan for. Not to mention you're greatly misinterpreting what the man is even saying.
Patrick Henry did not say the same thing.
We have already established that you are incapable of reasoning what Farrakhan said as his own words contradict your claims about what he said.
You didn't read your own source(as per usual).
I always read my sources. You simply don't understand what "between the lines" means. You allow yourself to take the reporter's interpretation as objective fact, as opposed to sticking purely with the objective facts in the reporting and discarding the fluff from newscaster barbie/ken.
The point of this hunger strike was to spread awareness to the rest of the campus, which they successfully did(As you so kindly show in your next quote). Not to get anything done with so few members of the student body. You're an idiot to think that this 9-tent protest would change anything without the help of the rest of the student body.
The demonstration was there for 6 days and gained little additional attention until the national media picked it up. At which point, there were suddenly 'thousands' there to support it.
Columbia sits right on Interstate 70 and Highway 63. Virtually all traffic from Kansas City to Jefferson City and/or Saint Louis passes through Columbia - which is where the University of Missouri is. Exit south bound on Stadium and you'll drive right through part of the MU campus or you can brave the traffic at the 63/70 connector and take 63 to exit right onto Grindstone (which dead-ends if you go the other direction, so it's kind of hard to screw up). Grind Stone passes pretty much right through the MU campus, as well.
There are several major cities that sit within a five hour travel time to draw from.
You must be registered for see links
Unlike the media, which was blocked and shouted down by the Social Justice Worriers at Mizzou, Sharon was able to speak her mind and have it shared by over 2,800 people for now.
...
Clearly, she’s not alone, given that even a good number of football players didn’t support their teammates boycott that led to the resignation of a university president. Unfortunately, those voices, much like Jessie’s – and the voices of who knows how many other students – just didn’t matter as much to the media. "
You must be registered for see links
" If this is one Mizzou, then we ALL get to have an opinion on this and we are all entitled to express said opinions without being attacked. However, students, faculty, and administrators have all been intimidated into compliance by social justice warriors who allow only certain views and opinions to be voiced. We are not creating a free and open dialogue; instead, we are creating a climate where certain students are afraid to express their opinions for fear of extreme retaliation. The current movement headed by Concerned Student 1950 has done much more to divide our campus than it has done to unite us. "
You must be registered for see links
As the video here illustrates - they will not give names, nor information upon who they are or where they come from.
This is because most of them are not from Mizzou. They are neither students at the school, nor are they residents of Missouri. This is, by the way, not the first time the NAACP has engaged in this kind of behavior:
You must be registered for see links
Rosebud is a fairly small town on Highway 50 between Union and Jefferson City. As you can see - the NAACP did not 'march' - as it claimed - to their destination. They rode a bus. The bus was full of people from Chicago - not people from Ferguson (though a lot of the people arrested in Ferguson were from Chicago, as well).
You see, a number of institutions that certain wealthy individuals donate to actually sponsor these activist events. In the weeks leading up to this protest, I received two "earn $400/week" advertisements under my windshield wiper with a number attached. The number links back to these activist groups. No place else advertises for jobs this way.
You must be registered for see links
" Demonstrators demanding their just rewards for raising hell on the streets of Ferguson turned out in force last week for another demonstration to get money they said they were owed by the George Soros-funded activist group Missourians for Reform and Empowerment, according to Twitter postings collected by the conservative news aggregate site Weasel Zippers.
And things got a little noisy in MORE’s St. Louis office during the May 14 confrontation.
According to WZ, the white guy the demonstrators say they’ll “f*ck up” is Jeff Ordower, MORE’s founder and a guy with leftist credentials so impeccable he’s got a Huffington post bio that shows he’s not only a graduate of the AFL-CIO Institute and a former Service Employees International Union organizer, he’s also openly gay and an LGBT activist to boot. (Sorry, ladies.) "
I currently reside in a town called Sedalia - about an hours' drive away from Columbia - taking 65 North to 70 East and riding that to Stadium - take a left on Pride Avenue and I'm pretty much there.
This is how these activist campaigns work. I received similar notices on my apartment door back when I lived in Columbia prior to major protest events, as well - including the protests at Balt-no-more.
It's easy money - show up, go with the flow, hit up the crack dealer on the way home.
You say this as if it's a bad thing. As I showed above, that was the actual point of the protest. To spread awareness to the entire campus. Through this fraternity and football team, the protest gained support and followers and gained the following it needed to accomplish its task.
You don't quite understand the concept of time.
They were camped out for 6 days in the middle of everyone without drawing much attention at all. Then, suddenly, 'thousands' decided this needed attention.
But only after the news media picked it up and made a national deal of it.
I'm still waiting for your proof of these thousands of students being bused in.
The proof is that I have eyes and ears in that town. The reality is that the comments from fast food workers about a lot of charter bus activity on the same day barely make it out of social media.
This isn't the first rodeo for these types of groups. The busses aren't dropping people off on the quad. They're dropping people off down by Burger King or Taco Bell to let them walk up on campus.
They've been doing this since the 60s. It's obvious when you're wise to it - but when you're the casual onlooker, it's a bit more crazy sounding until you actually see these people load up into a bus and go back home - or pile out of a bus to go cause trouble.
Not to say that none of these protesters were from Mizzou - but I would imagine that 4 out of 10 were not from Missouri and 8 out of 10 were not students at Mizzou.
In your eyes, but not in the eyes of this Jonathan Butler. Not to mention you don't even go to the school. Why don't you ask him what racism he has gone through. I'm certain the boot-to-neck method will work just as well here.
In his eyes, the claim to racism is a tool to be used for power. He will squeal it any time he doesn't get his way.
It's quickly approaching the time where I don't care if half the blacks in America think it makes me a racist. I'll put a round ('cap' is the native tongue, I believe) and move on with my day. I'll put a round into someone I see being racist - and I'll put a round into someone I see screaming racism. That may lead to situations where I shoot both people on either side of the confrontation.
Eventually, I'll run out of people who have an issue with each other, and we'll start rebuilding from there.
