DN

[Goetia]

Whats your point ?

You must be registered for see links

Three pages .

Someone whose been here since 2012 can tell you that there have been plenty more than 3 pages worth of successful DN games .

So tell me , whats the harm in a DN RPG sub section ?

You must be registered for see links

1 page ^

You must be registered for see links

1 page ^

You must be registered for see links

2 pages ^

You must be registered for see links

1 THREAD !!!

I never said there was harm in a section for it, I said there was no need for one. For someone who plays an RPG where attention to detail is crucial, your displayed skill here is surprisingly lacking.

DN games aren't consistently successful, I can tell you that much. More often than not, it's due to shortage of players or players leaving mid-game or the thread being closed due to no productive activity in the said thread.

So I ask you, what is your point?

Failure threads every single day? Idk what you're smoking l, but most games are successful. They just get deleted after the game is over.

I am aware of what happens to DN threads when games are concluded, but don't try to lie to me. Many games I see, shortage of players and such are commonplace issues. Even if 2-3 successful games are held and then deleted, that still doesn't do much to outweigh the number of failure threads that are littered throughout the forum.

 

[Complex]

Don't compare my active threads to your deleted threads? What a terrible argument for your side. You were right to stop arguing.

It's not a terrible argument. You're comparing an active thread that's been up for a year to threads that last a couple of hours and get deleted

 

[The Necromancer]

It's not a terrible argument. You're comparing an active thread that's been up for a year to threads that last a couple of hours and get deleted

I really can't comprehend how that makes any amount of sense in your brain.

We should make a separate section for threads that last a couple hours, but not for those that last multiple months? That's totally backwards, bro.

Your whole argument hinged on activity, and now you're telling me your DN threads don't have as much.

 

[Complex]

I really can't comprehend how that makes any amount of sense in your brain.

We should make a separate section for threads that last a couple hours, but not for those that last multiple months? That's totally backwards, bro.

If we get our own section, mods don't have to trash the threads. How are you not getting this?
There are so much more benefits for DN players

 

[King Kendrick]

I never said there was harm in a section for it, I said there was no need for one. For someone who plays an RPG where attention to detail is crucial, your displayed skill here is surprisingly lacking.

DN games aren't consistently successful, I can tell you that much. More often than not, it's due to shortage of players or players leaving mid-game or the thread being closed due to no productive activity in the said thread.

So I ask you, what is your point?

Thats invalid because im telling you from experience that , yes , there are plenty of Successful games , much more than failures . Much so it can stand as its own sub section .

If you want proof , join the group , look at all the screenshots weve had to save , because we dont have an actual section , therfore we must delete the threads immediately after .

 

[The Necromancer]

If we get our own section, mods don't have to trash the threads. How are you not getting this?

Your threads get trashed because of a lack of activity or an abundance of spam.

That means, that if DN threads got their own section, it would be an empty sub-forum of unplayed DN games or spam.

As if this debating has any point to it. It won't be approved.

 

[Complex]

Your threads get trashed because of a lack of activity or an abundance of spam.

That means, that if DN threads got their own section, it would be an empty sub-forum of unplayed DN games or spam.

Lml look at this guy, I'm not even going to continue since you're wasting my time. And my battery is about to die. Plus you don't even play DN Lml post is so flawed

 

[Goetia]

Thats invalid because im telling you from experience that , yes , there are plenty of Successful games , much more than failures . Much so it can stand as its own sub section .

If you want proof , join the group , look at all the screenshots weve had to save , because we dont have an actual section , therfore we must delete the threads immediately after .

And things haven't changed at all in the past 3 years? Activity on the forum has seen massive decline, and you're still enclosed in your little bubble thinking that nothing has changed and that successful DN games are being held all the time.

If it were a year or two ago, where games surely would've been more common than they are now, it may have warranted a section. But not now, not anymore.

 

[Cabbage]

It would make it easier for mods to delete when the games are over since a lot of times old DN threads stay up for quite a while. :wut:

It all being in one place might make the cleaning up easier

That's already theoretically the case though. Just doesn't occur all the time.

 

[The Necromancer]

Lml look at this guy, I'm not even going to continue since you're wasting my time. And my battery is about to die. Plus you don't even play DN Lml post is so flawed

Run away. I'll wait for your new section to not be created.

 

[King Kendrick]

And things haven't changed at all in the past 3 years? Activity on the forum has seen massive decline, and you're still enclosed in your little bubble thinking that nothing has changed and that successful DN games are being held all the time.

If it were a year or two ago, where games surely would've been more common than they are now, it may have warranted a section. But not now, not anymore.

Lol , im talking as someone who still plays now , buddy .

Now not anymore , claims someone who has clearly participated in more DN games than me lately :sdo:

No use in arguing , besides , you said you aren't against it anyways .

 

[Cabbage]

Whats your point ?

You must be registered for see links

Three pages .

Someone whose been here since 2012 can tell you that there have been plenty more than 3 pages worth of successful DN games .

So tell me , whats the harm in a DN RPG sub section ?

You must be registered for see links

1 page ^

You must be registered for see links

1 page ^

You must be registered for see links

2 pages ^

You must be registered for see links

1 THREAD !!!

This is more a problem of this forum not attracting enough general anime fans tbh :/

 

[Goetia]

Lol , im talking as someone who still plays now , buddy .

Now not anymore , claims someone who has clearly participated in more DN games than me lately :sdo:

Out of curiosity, how many games have you played in the last month that carried until the game was concluded? Then, tell me how many games you played in a single month back in 2013. I'm sure that if you can use that brain of yours, you can comprehend what the purpose of these questions are.

No use in arguing , besides , you said you aren't against it anyways .

...and I thought I was making progress with someone's comprehensive ability. My mistake.

I'm against the notion of a DN RPG section being made. Which is why I'm here. Posting. In this thread.

 

[King Kendrick]

Who are you to talk about raging, buddy?

Keep it on topic, or send it to VM.

OT: A separate forum decreases traffic rather than increasing it. This will only hurt the forum.

Say that to the links i posted earlier . Why not delete some of those , then make a DN Section , its bound to increase taffic unlike a section with 1 THREAD .

You have zero evidence of this either , you just claim it will decrease traffic basded of your deluded , unfounded butthurt toward DN Games .

 

[The Necromancer]

Say that to the links i posted earlier . Why not delete some of those , then make a DN Section , its bound to increase taffic unlike a section with 1 THREAD .

You have zero evidence of this either , you just claim it will decrease traffic basded of your deluded , unfounded butthurt toward DN Games .

These sections were created long, long ago when traffic was abundant. Traffic is not abundant now, so there's no reason to create sub-forums. U_U

Tell me, how many sub-forums or forum changes at all have been made in the last 2 years?

 

[Pumpkin Ninja]

I never said there was harm in a section for it, I said there was no need for one. For someone who plays an RPG where attention to detail is crucial, your displayed skill here is surprisingly lacking.

DN games aren't consistently successful, I can tell you that much. More often than not, it's due to shortage of players or players leaving mid-game or the thread being closed due to no productive activity in the said thread.

So I ask you, what is your point?



I am aware of what happens to DN threads when games are concluded, but don't try to lie to me. Many games I see, shortage of players and such are commonplace issues. Even if 2-3 successful games are held and then deleted, that still doesn't do much to outweigh the number of failure threads that are littered throughout the forum.

Why are you even arguing? A huge number of people would like one and there is no harm in it. So why do you care?

 

[King Kendrick]

Out of curiosity, how many games have you played in the last month that carried until the game was concluded? Then, tell me how many games you played in a single month back in 2013. I'm sure that if you can use that brain of yours, you can comprehend what the purpose of these questions are.



...and I thought I was making progress with someone's comprehensive ability. My mistake.

I'm against the notion of a DN RPG section being made. Which is why I'm here. Posting. In this thread.

So youre asking for exact numbers ? Like i remember . You know what i do remember , all the times Dn games were just a pile of spam . Im not denying that there havent been fails .

What i can tell you , in the past year there have been many many more succesful games than busts . Like i said , the snapshots in our group prove it .

I never said there was harm in a section for it, I said there was no need for one. For someone who plays an RPG where attention to detail is crucial, your displayed skill here is surprisingly lacking.

I guess i misinterpreted that :sdo:

 

[Goetia]

Why are you even arguing? A huge number of people would like one and there is no harm in it. So why do you care?

As of your post, I forgot why. You just saved me tons of trouble.

Cheers.

 

[Complex]

Run away. I'll wait for your new section to not be created.

I'm just providing a suggestion. 50+ members used to play DN games, but mods been killing the games which killed the popularity. But it's not like you would know that since you don't even play DN. Please stay in your NDS riding Sakura's V

 

[King Kendrick]

Why not try a DN Sub-Section ?

Last thread got basically closed with no response .

Maybe because OP didnt really sell it enough .

---

Why A Death Note Sub-Section would be Beneficial​

---

Death note , one of the most popular manga of all time , still has yet to grace our M.A.C section . Why ?


Meanwhile

You must be registered for see links

"Kimi ni Todoke"

Is still here , generating practically no traffic .

I could also point out MANY other sub-sections , genrating no nearly enough traffic , still up .

---

My Suggestion :​

---

Can we at-least try out a Death Note Sub-Section in my opinion it will ,


- Generate more traffic , including DN fans , who practically have no where to go except Non-Naruto RP , to talk .

-Encourage users to be more spam-free , and behave , since we actually have been listened too

Since we all know , most mad , spammer members just want to be at least heard

What is a rebel? A man who says no: but whose refusal does not imply a renunciation.

- Make facilitating DN Games easier , plus , we wont have to scramble trying to get screenshots .


If impossible or no , can a Mod or Admin actually answer me ? Thank you .