KeyofDestiny
Member
Unsubstantiated? Ya know; At a point I gave thought to what is 'harder' your skull or the Jubi's hide but I'll be honest, you entertained me. Speaking of the main argument; in your previous post you stated something so logically detestable that it heavily swayed my interest from continuing this discussion. You stated this:
Or in other words that: If there is every a case regarding the uncertainty in a Jutsu or anything for that matter then what Cannon say's goes because Canon statements will always trump uncertain assertions.
I'll draw a final example of the ridiculousness in your logic. An individual which we will call "A" makes an uncertain pertaining to a particular Jutsu:
Uncertain Assertion made by "A": I do not believe Rikiri can cut a Lightening bolt or even Kirin simply because the Databook say's so.
Your logic and line of reason: The Databook (cannon) says Rikiri can cut a lightening and you don't have proof of it doing so, so It can cut Kirin.
Reality: Due to it's shear magnitude and power Kirin would evaporate both Kakashi and his Rikiri.
Are you really going to continue making yourself look like a fool with these shitty examples? This debate has declined in quality because all you can do is make assumptions, ignore canon, and cry about logical fallacies when they don't even apply here.
1. Kirin is not a regular Lightning bolt. Kirin is a combination of many lightning bolts formed into a giant dragon. So it doesn't even fall under the category of being able to be cut by Raikiri. Why the hell are you mentioning it?
2. Whether or not Raikiri can cut Kirin isn't an uncertain assumption, because Raikiri's feats in the Manga are proof that it cannot overpower Kirin. There is no uncertain statement here. You are trying to invent one like you've tried to do for the past 3 posts.
Your examples become stupider and stupider the more you post.
Red herring? Once again, you throw a fallacy that doesn't apply here at a post that you have no counter for. You brought up those piss poor things you have the nerve to call valid examples to the table, ignoring the whole basis you need to have to even make a comparison. UNCERTAIN STATEMENTS. None of your statements were uncertain, and I showed that. Please tell me where I "changed the subject". Oh wait, I don't expect an answer. I expect you to find another fallacy from the internet and copy and paste it here since nothing intelligent can come from your own mind.Now, you see everything within this spoiler (Take a good look at it):
It is essentially this:
Not only is it a fallacy but the mere fact that you go on to defend the silly notion of Hiruzen knowing all the Jutsu within the leaf shows that your entire way of thinking is fallacious. There is no longer any need for me to waste post's responding to you. I initially got the notion after reading this:
Like I said, it depends on what one thinks when the term "all jutsu in the leaf" is mentioned. But of course, Waltz is gonna do what Waltz does best and ignore statements that clearly address the nonsense he spews. Please save me the bullshit pal.
Oh look. Another logical fallacy that doesn't apply here. Your fallacy falls short for the simple reason that there is no unfavorable circumstance for my argument. What's even funnier about your idiotic style of debating is that while you sit there copy and pasting logical fallacies instead of addressing the arguments in front of you, you fail to realize that this very fallacy is one you've made.The underlined is essentially:
-You state that Sasuke using PS is why Obito fell, because they were fighting before with Susanoo and Kurama and lost.
-Yet you ignore that Sasuke used PS, and that Sasuke armored PS onto Kurama and then defeated Obito.
You state that Obito fell because Sasuke brought out PS, but no Manga panel proves that. Manga panels show that the combination of their Avatars is what beat him. Manga panels show that Boosted Susanoo=Perfect Susanoo (Sasuke's)
I made a detailed post on why his boosted Susanoo is equal to his Perfect Susanoo, but all you could do was ignore it and throw "conjecture" at it. So please tell me how appeal to ignorance works here when I've posted my reasoning for everything I've stated and have never once stated that "it's right because Manga doesn't say it's wrong"? You need to learn how to read first of all, and then stop picking pieces of my post and throwing fallacies at them while ignoring the parts with the actual evidence. Please tell me how my argument is conjecture when I've posted scans that prove my argument.Since we do not know the full capabilities of Rin'negan-Sasuke's Perfect Susano'o without the Rikudo powerup, the red is essentially:
Nothing but a joke poster with sub par argumentation at best.
I'm 100% convinced that you don't even know how to apply these fallacies to an opponent's argumentation if needed, because all you have done this whole debate is cry" fallacy that, fallacy this" even though none of them even begin to apply. Do me a favor and stop wasting my time. Any spectator with half a brain probably wishes for the same.
Last edited: