[Debate] Should Fathers Have A Say In Abortion?
- Thread starter Luther
- Start date
Umari Senju
Active member
While I agree it's the woman's body it is also the man's seed. This really should be discussed between the mother AND father.
Yes it's the woman's body, and even if she carries it to term for 9 months, that doesn't make it any less important to the father. While if the mother decides to abort against the father's wishes, she causes mental and emotional harm to the father. And Vise versa.
It really is important that both are in agreement. And if they both can't agree on the outcome then the relationship should end, in which case, then it comes down to what the mother wants.
Yes it's the woman's body, and even if she carries it to term for 9 months, that doesn't make it any less important to the father. While if the mother decides to abort against the father's wishes, she causes mental and emotional harm to the father. And Vise versa.
It really is important that both are in agreement. And if they both can't agree on the outcome then the relationship should end, in which case, then it comes down to what the mother wants.
ComplexCity
Banned
Whoops my bad, got u confused with another member. Nothing wrong with making a mistake
Punk Hazard
Active member
Awards
Which is why you should keep my name out of your mouth.
ComplexCity
Banned
Hashirama Senjuu
Active member
I use too, then I had a son. That's the difference between everyone on this thread. Example: If thread maker had a child, he would've made a thread stating why man have a say instead of asking if they do
Hashirama Senjuu
Active member
ComplexCity
Banned
Sorry buddy, I live in America so I can do what I want in the grounds that it doesn't harm anyone right? I already owned up to my mistake don't tell me what I can and can't do
***** what? Lemme dissect this stupidity to an extreme degree cause you don't understand what I'm saying.
Then you ain't thinking in a different perspective, you just though in a perspective of having a son, then not having it. But not in the many situations that could account for child birth. Which was my point, I said different perspectives, not your own.
LOL There is a even bigger different of the people around the world, but you gone just keep it between this thread? Narrow minded thoughts get no love.
You ain't the thread maker doeee? Why you tryna put your own thoughts and trying to create a situation in other peoples head and reality ?
You a narrow minded thinker and only speaking on your perspective, but I guess that is how it is fammmmmmmm done here
Punk Hazard
Active member
Awards
He should certainly be able to have his say but at the end of the day, it's her body and she would be the one carrying it, giving birth and even probably breastfeeding it.
You can't force a woman to do all of that unless she wants to. It's like trying to force a man to donate one of his own organs just because someone donated to him, you simply can't. Though you can try and persuade him to do so.
You can't force a woman to do all of that unless she wants to. It's like trying to force a man to donate one of his own organs just because someone donated to him, you simply can't. Though you can try and persuade him to do so.
Umari Senju
Active member
Not quite. If the father actually steps up to the plate. The mother does the carrying pre-birth. After that though the father begins an 18+ year long journey on how to teach his son to be a man or how to teach his daughter to become a woman. The mother has a role in this as well. But generally the guiding hand is usually more prominent in the father while the mother helps the child develop mental stability and emotional nurturing.
In the absence of one or the other than it falls solely on the single parent be it the mother or father.
ComplexCity
Banned
Like you do with some of your responses? :sdo:
Already said I made a mistake, please get the panties out of your butt and stop derailing.
Punk Hazard
Active member
Awards
How amusing you say this when you're the one with the taste saltier than Sasha Grey's.
Hashirama Senjuu
Active member
Well "fam" the only one Bering narrow minded here is you, as you have no idea what its like having a kid and never will until you actually do, "fam". So everything you said is just irrelevant bs as I know the perspective you're coming from. Sorry "fam" but maybe if you weren't quick to conclusions you wouldn't seem so stupid and immature. No parent will disagree with me unless they're a POS, and you can feel free to prove me wrong "fam."
ultraChalk
Active member
Awards
Sakura Bunny
Active member
Awards
not unless he wants to carry the baby for the 9 months
oh w8...
but tbh
no one should have to have/raise a child they don't want
i also believe that fathers who don't want the child while the mother does, should be able to sign his rights away so he doesn't have to pay child support
but it should be under certain circumstances
he has to sign before the baby is born, and if the prego woman doesn't tell him about the baby (tries to surprise him and demand child support), he should still be allowed to sign if he doesn't want the kid
like here are some examples-
1-girl wants to trap bf by breaking condom/stopping birth control so she gets prego, bf doesn't want the baby, but girl isn't aborting so her and bf will always be 'tied' to each other. bf should be able to sign his rights away
2- gf and bf find out gf is prego, they are both excited but after the baby is born, bf wants to leave gf for another woman or w/e and doesn't want anything to do with the baby now. he shouldn't be able to sign away and should be stuck with child support
this is really tricky tho and has a lot of issues that could happen
ignore me lol
oh w8...
but tbh
no one should have to have/raise a child they don't want
i also believe that fathers who don't want the child while the mother does, should be able to sign his rights away so he doesn't have to pay child support
but it should be under certain circumstances
he has to sign before the baby is born, and if the prego woman doesn't tell him about the baby (tries to surprise him and demand child support), he should still be allowed to sign if he doesn't want the kid
like here are some examples-
1-girl wants to trap bf by breaking condom/stopping birth control so she gets prego, bf doesn't want the baby, but girl isn't aborting so her and bf will always be 'tied' to each other. bf should be able to sign his rights away
2- gf and bf find out gf is prego, they are both excited but after the baby is born, bf wants to leave gf for another woman or w/e and doesn't want anything to do with the baby now. he shouldn't be able to sign away and should be stuck with child support
this is really tricky tho and has a lot of issues that could happen
ignore me lol
Last edited:
Punk Hazard
Active member
Awards
The woman can do the same. Sign away rights to the kid after its born and give it to the dad. 18 years of emotional, financial, moral and general support seems like a preeeetty fair trade off for 9 months of carrying the child. I mean, if there can be laws that forces a father who wants nothing to do with the kid to pay child support for 18 years or until the woman is married, then I see nothing wrong with a law saying the woman has to carry the child for 9 months and then she can be rid of it from her life.