- Joined
- Jan 21, 2012
- Messages
- 37,690
- Reaction score
- 1,999
I thought the novels were canon. They have naruto and shikamaru's weddings in them.
How about instead of "thinking" you search up a valid source first?
I thought the novels were canon. They have naruto and shikamaru's weddings in them.
The novels are not canon. So don't even bring those up.
Sakura's character was never leading to be a housewife, while in the end that is all she could become. She gets hated because Kishi has failed to develop her character properly through out the story. At this point in time she cannot be redeemed by being a mere good mother.
Lol I'm just a casual fan. I dont care if im wrong. Its fun seeing people like you taking this shit so seriously. Good day m8How about instead of "thinking" you search up a valid source first?
Lol I'm just a casual fan. I dont care if im wrong. Its fun seeing people like you taking this shit so seriously. Good day m8
Who says the novels aren't canon did kishi say they weren't?
How about you tell me who says the novels were canon first? If there is no proof its simply not canon.
I can just use the same logic as you seeing how nobody said it's not canon so they are canon
So do we need kishi to check of what's canon or not for us or can we not
Rize's solo victim said it here.My mom is a housewife. I admire how she sacrificed her career. She is better than me(altough I am a male, I cannot think of giving up my career)
You should not look at these statements like she sucks because she is a housewife. You should rather try to trace the origins. It started when people claimed that she runs a hospital and what not and started using that to defend herb in character debates. Since the novles are non canon, this feat is also non - canon and should not be used. But fans were still trying to use it as a feat, so the opposition went to the other end. I am sure nobody thinks being a housewife is wrong but it is about a feat being non canon and people's reaction to using that feat as canon.
How about instead of "thinking" you search up a valid source first?