What do you think about the traditional engagement procedure(man gets expensive ring),divorce, court bias and all the aspects of western marriage.
I wanna read all perspectives
Well, it worked pretty well for at least a few hundred years.
Granted, it wasn't always the tradition to get an engagement ring, and in many cases, marriage rings were not financially practical until years into the marriage.
Of course, courtship practices were different then, too. Even if premarital *** was likely higher than social stigma would insist, cohabitation prior to marriage was much more rare. Women often remained at home, or close to home and only left home after finding a man she was comfortable enough with to marry after a substantial period of dating (several months to a few years).
When partners decide to co-habitate too early in the relationship, it makes it much more difficult to break up. It isn't necessarily the case that "modern" people are any less frivolous in their courtship mentalities - it is simply that they have disregarded the procedure that served for hundreds of years (if not thousands) to make it easier for a romantically involved couple to disengage from a relationship that wasn't working.
If you move in with someone, you share bills, often share sleeping quarters, share responsibilities, etc. This makes it very difficult if the person who was really amazing and awesome 3 months ago is now not really what you were looking for. If you break up, you've got to go figure out some other place to stay (or... ... figure out how to stay with that person... ), may have to stretch your pay or dig into savings until a room mate can be located. You've got to sort through who-bought-what and all manner of other things.
Even if these are done without drama and violence, it is still a very emotional and stressful process.
Many choose to get married, not necessarily too soon - but after the two already feel rather 'stuck' with each other. May as well get the tax break for it, right?
This leads to high incidence of divorce.
Further reinforcing the trend toward divorce are various concepts that have arisen from the court system. Since men, historically, have been the 'bread winners' of a family, courts have seen fit to require a man to pay benefits to a woman should they separate in marriage.
This is an absolutely tragic story:
You must be registered for see links
" He flipped the page, his hands shaking. The judge had awarded permanent alimony.
"My alimony obligation is $1,500," Terry said. But Murielle would owe him $525 a month in child support for their son.
And Murielle was to pay the outstanding bills of her former attorney, Thacker, and her former forensic accountant — a combined $150,486.
Terry smiled, satisfied. He was finally divorced.
Five years, four judges, six lawyers, $400,000 in attorney and expert fees and costs, a child yanked back and forth, the petty arguing — all for a net payment of about $1,000 a month.
...
She said the legal system had failed her. I was struck by the irony. Both Terry and she felt the system had failed them. Neither supposedly had money left to pay each other or their attorneys. And now she was complaining about legal fees. That was new. Divorced, the two of them again had something in common. "
The problem is that you can't have your cake and eat it, too.
The traditional concept of dating and marriage arose out of the need to protect the interests of the family unit. Women are best served by a stable husband and men are best served by a stable woman - both of whom are best capable of providing for and caring for children.
When you begin to disregard portions of this procedure, or when you begin to try and produce a lack of consequence for being unstable - then you disregard thousands of years that these systems had to be developed under ongoing trial.
That doesn't mean that it is absolutely important to have a wedding in a church, or that the dress be white - or other things like that... but that the overall process has its merits and practical function within the context of human behavioral patterns.
It developed the way it did for a reason.