Is Gay Marriage A Civil Right's Issue? Should it be?
- Thread starter Melanin
- Start date
Songbird Supreme
Member
Punk Hazard
Active member
Awards
The same can be said for many things that are not considered wrong, so it's not good enough.
ComplexCity
Banned
So click it. You still haven't refuted anything I said and going back and reading. My post were not off topic. This was a thread about why I don't think it should be a civil right. And to sum up what I'm saying. Because it's not granted to everyone, IE incestuous couples and pure homosexual couples cannot reproduce
Songbird Supreme
Member
Reproduction was refuted already. What about a sterile women who wants to get married? Can she not marry her husband since she can't reproduce? What about an infertile man? Does he not have the right to marry his wife since he can't pregnate her? Reproduction argument has been contradicted over and over again. Like I said before, it's redundant.
Last edited:
ComplexCity
Banned
But it does the civil right is not being bestowed upon everyone. So I feel it should not just be given to homosexuals but ppl that practice incest as well because they are one in the same
That's due to a sickness or unnatural/naturally interference so how is that even comparable? Humans were not biologically designed to produce with the same gender, we cannot pass on our DNA that way. I fail to see your point
Songbird Supreme
Member
It doesn't matter. You said that people who cannot reproduce should not marry regardless of why said people cannot reproduce. You can't cherry pick.
ComplexCity
Banned
Please post where I said that. I said homosexuality is wrong because they can't produce (biologically). I made it quite clear that I don't care what homosexuals do.
But if I had a reason that it shouldn't be considered a civil right to them, it is as I stated above because it is not givien to all groups
Punk Hazard
Active member
Awards
ComplexCity
Banned
Homosexual couples cannot reproduce didn't think I needed to be specific
Last edited:
Punk Hazard
Active member
Awards
Not which each other, but they can.
Besides, why is the ability to make children such a big deal? Have you not realized our species have moved past "**** and survive?"
ComplexCity
Banned
Punk Hazard
Active member
Awards
Which isn't he only value a human being has, so stop acting like it is. And they can still reproduce anyways.
ComplexCity
Banned
Your argument is coming from an emotionally driven point of view instead of a scientific and logical one. It is our purpose as a species to pass on our genes and survive and is an essential part of the human race. That fact that homosexual (couples) cannot reproduce goes against what our purpose is as a species. Your moot point about flying airplanes is not only irrelevant, but makes zero sense seeing as how (a) heterosexual ((couple)s) can fly and still mate with the opposite *** to reproduce and pass on their genes to ensure survival. Again, I don't know what's so hard to understand.
Just because there are ways around the problem doesn't mean it isn't there. Just like someone who has cancer and is taking chemotherapy or how Magic Johnson has HIV but is regulated with the medicine he takes.
@Songbird: To say my argument for incest was irrelevant is not logical as well. Going back and reading, it was you asking for my reasoning of why was against homosexuality and that was one of them.
Just because there are ways around the problem doesn't mean it isn't there. Just like someone who has cancer and is taking chemotherapy or how Magic Johnson has HIV but is regulated with the medicine he takes.
@Songbird: To say my argument for incest was irrelevant is not logical as well. Going back and reading, it was you asking for my reasoning of why was against homosexuality and that was one of them.
Punk Hazard
Active member
Awards
So they can simply donate sperm/eggs and receive donations. That way they're still reproducing, they're contributing to the species' population. Issue resolved.
It's not a moot point. You are saying our species should only do what it's designed to do, and shouldn't do what it wasn't designed to do, which is why you view homosexuality as wrong. But why doesn't this apply to flying? To help you comprehend the point and the relevancy to this discussion, just answer this question: Were human beings designed to fly?
Incest has more than just negative effects in terms of the babies though. Many people who have been a part of incest have reported emotional distress because of it.
ComplexCity
Banned
1. You're missing the point yet again. It doesn't matter if they can donate sperm. They can't reproduce with one another. Which means that according to our species bilogically it is not suppose to be happening as our species can die off. Just because the problem can be worked around does not mean it is not there and that's a point you seem not to get
2. It is a moot point how does flying prevent heterosexuals from reproducing? Homosexual (couples) cannot reproduce
3. Same thing can be said about homosexuality so I don't see were you are getting at. I'd also like to see a link supporting this as well
Last edited:
I prefer the terms same *** or same gender marrige. Saying "gay" marrige reduces people's rights in need to one social norm and law (as if marrige is only problem of gay people) and erases the fact that trans/bisexual/asexual people can be in same gender/*** marrige.
That been said i think their every right is a civil rights issue. Just like how interracial marrige was a civil rights issue.
That been said i think their every right is a civil rights issue. Just like how interracial marrige was a civil rights issue.
adeshina365
Active member
He rise of the sodomites is a remarkable indicator of the degradation of morals, ethics and principles brought on by secular liberalism. The hour draws near.