Is Gay Marriage A Civil Right's Issue? Should it be?

[ComplexCity]

ho·mo·pho·bia\ˌhō-mə-ˈfō-bē-ə\
noun
: irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against homosexuality or homosexuals



Nothing in this definition suggest I am homophobic. Anyway go back and read it I am on a phone

 

[ComplexCity]

You brought it to support your statement that homosexuality/bisexuality is wrong? That makes ZERO sense whatsoever. Incest is a completely different thing from hetero/homo/bisexualities. It doesn't help your argument at all.

yet you can give zero reason as to how it is except that they can produce still borns which has already been refuted. Incest supports exactly what Im stating

 

[ComplexCity]

You brought it to support your statement that homosexuality/bisexuality is wrong? That makes ZERO sense whatsoever. Incest is a completely different thing from hetero/homo/bisexualities. It doesn't help your argument at all.

Tell me then: what does proving whether or not incest is harmless/harmful have to do with homosexuality or bisexuality being wrong in any way at all? I'd love to hear your view on it, because all I've heard so far is a bunch of dumb semantics with no weight.

All of these things have one thing in common it is the attraction of (assumed to be) consensual adults. Why can't you understand that?

 

[Songbird Supreme]

yet you can give zero reason as to how it is except that they can produce still borns which has already been refuted. Incest supports exactly what Im stating

I never stated incest was wrong. I never stated it was right. Why are you hiding behind some irrelevancy instead of addressing the actual subject? I'm not here to state my stance on incestuous behavior. I'm here to ask you why you logically think homosexuality/bisexuality is wrong, and you've yet to answer it.

 

[ComplexCity]

I never stated incest was wrong. I never stated it was right. Why are you hiding behind some irrelevancy instead of addressing the actual subject? I'm not here to state my stance on incestuous behavior. I'm here to ask you why you logically think homosexuality/bisexuality is wrong, and you've yet to answer it.

Incest is comparable to all 3 aforementioned identities. I'm still waiting for you to disprove this and it is still considered wrong

 

[Songbird Supreme]

All of these things have one thing in common it is the attraction of (assumed to be) consensual adults. Why can't you understand that?

Consensual ***, yes, between family members. Why can't you understand that? Different from two completely unrelated acquaintances.

 

[ComplexCity]

Consensual ***, yes, between family members. Why can't you understand that? Different from two completely unrelated acquaintances.

Facepalm

That's irrelevant, they are still male/male, male/female, female/female sexually attracted to each other

 

[Songbird Supreme]

Facepalm

It doesn't matter what they are, they are still male/male, male/female, female/female

Facepalm indeed. That's what I've been doing everytime I've had to read another one of your shitty posts.

Incest: deemed wrong for familial purposes.

Homosexuality: deemed wrong for being attracted to the same gender.

Incest is seen as wrong for completely different reasons regardless of consensuality OR gender. Get this through your empty head.

 

[ComplexCity]

Incest: deemed wrong for familial purposes.

Homosexuality: deemed wrong for being attracted to the same gender.

Incest is seen as wrong for completely different reasons regardless of consensuality OR gender. I've yet to see any relevancy.

Because they both were considered a taboo at one point

What they are looked upon wrongfully is irrelevant to two consensual parties anyway.

 

[Songbird Supreme]

What they are looked upon wrongfully is irrelevant to two consensual parties anyway.

Then I don't understand. How do you see it as wrong?

And how is Incest being taboo help your argument that homosexuality is wrong?

 

[ComplexCity]

Then I don't understand. How do you see it as wrong?

I never once said I agreed with incest. I just was making a point, I'm using your logic (the consensus part) but yet, it seems to be problematic.


But I'm done with this circular argument. You've just proved to me that that you have no argument to how they are not comparable wiith incest is that you can produce a still born (which has been refuted) and that it is between family ,(which is irrelevant)

 

[Songbird Supreme]

I never once said I agreed with incest. I just was making a point

That's fine. I've yet to understand your point though. I mean, I don't get how Incest being wrong or right leans support to homosexuality being wrong or right either..

 

[ComplexCity]

That's fine. I've yet to understand your point though. I mean, I don't get how Incest being wrong or right leans support to homosexuality being wrong or right either..

But you're a closeted thinker. Good day

 

[Songbird Supreme]

But you're a closeted thinker. Good day

What does that even mean lmao. You're the one saying it's wrong with no evidence but your own opinionated, ill-substianted statements yet I have a closed mind? smh..

 

[ComplexCity]

What does that even mean lmao. You're the one saying it's wrong with no evidence but your own opinionated, ill-substianted statements yet I have a closed mind? smh..

You're a special kind of retard I told you 3x why it's wrong. Artificial insemination (which is not natural) is irrelevant a group of same *** homosexuals cannot survive which has already been proven. Our species would die

 

[Songbird Supreme]

You're a special kind of retard I told you 3x why it's wrong.

No you didn't. All you did was go on some sort of semantic rollercoaster about Incest.

 

[ComplexCity]

No you didn't. All you did was go on some sort of semantic rollercoaster about Incest.

I did you don't comprehend very well and you just proved that just now.

 

[Punk Hazard]

No you didn't. All you did was go on some sort of semantic rollercoaster about Incest.

It's because human beings were not designed to do it. Kind of like how we weren't designed to fly, travel at 50 MPH, be in space, or be in the sea.

 

[ComplexCity]

It's because human beings were not designed to do it. Kind of like how we weren't designed to fly, travel at 50 MPH, be in space, or be in the sea.

Once again don't see how this is relevent. The same can be said for a lot of other things that is considered wrong

 

[Songbird Supreme]

Once again don't see how this is relevent.

This summarizes everything you've ever said on this thread :sdo:

It's because human beings were not designed to do it. Kind of like how we weren't designed to fly, travel at 50 MPH, be in space, or be in the sea.

ayyy lmao