- Joined
- Apr 21, 2011
- Messages
- 59,557
- Reaction score
- 4,729
Really makes you wonder why Law didn't do that when he and Luffy were fighting Doflamingo and Trebol. Law doing that is not as easy as you make it out to be.
*points you to post number 6*
Really makes you wonder why Law didn't do that when he and Luffy were fighting Doflamingo and Trebol. Law doing that is not as easy as you make it out to be.
*points you to post number 6*
But if Oda clearly portrays Doflamingo > Law who are we to decide Law could actually pull it off in an alternative way?
It's going in against the author his rules
Haki blocks Law's cutting ability as hinted by Doflamingo during his final clash with Vergo. He can't do the swapGroup fights involving Law always makes me consider his personality swapping ability as a great means towards victory. If Kizaru tries to use Yata Mirror, Law could swap his personality with, say Luffy, while he's stalled, then Zoro attacks his body and Law switches them back as Zoro's sword slices his throat.
Haki blocks Law's cutting ability as hinted by Doflamingo during his final clash with Vergo. He can't do the swap
What does that have to do with Shambles? Doflamingo saying it blocks his cutting ability specifically indicates that this counter doesn't apply to all of the abilities, especially when Doffy knows much of what the Ope Ope can do. Otherwise he would have just said the fruit as a whole, not just the cutting ability.
Enel>Skypeia Luffy but who won?
Why are you asking me why Oda did what he did? It was done, nothing we can do about it unless it's retconned.Why would Oda give Haki a very specific feature like that?
That's differen, Luffy has a natural immunity to Enel's fruit
No such thing is there between Law and Doffy
It's been clearly shown Doffy > Law , ANYONE thinking otherwise is just wanking his the one he prefers
Why are you asking me why Oda did what he did? It was done, nothing we can do about it unless it's retconned.
No, it's not. The point is that just because person A>person B, that doesn't mean person A will always win. Nature of abilities, certain circumstances, etc. all matter.
Doffy>Law? Yes, that can't be currently contested. Doffy defeats Law 100% of the time? That's an entirely different statement.