I said that from the start .-.If you dropped the stronger point you should've said so. Lol.
Ok then.
Assuming that the mask is the only thing in the area, sure.
But if there are cloaks they're not stopping at 4 either.
I said that from the start .-.If you dropped the stronger point you should've said so. Lol.
Ok then.
Assuming that the mask is the only thing in the area, sure.
Where? Meh, who cares? LolI said that from the start .-.
But if there are cloaks they're not stopping at 4 either.
I find it funny how you change your mind according to what is convenient to you. I remember having argued with you that Hirudora destroyed Madara's susano and you were like "no it didn't, madara just deactivated it" and now that saying Hirudora > Susano is convenient to prove your point, you just say it, while when it wasn't convenient then you said otherwise (wich was really stupid seriously, it was obvious hirudora destroyed madara's susano).Hirudora obliterated V3 Susanoo. Hidan tanked Atsugai nor does it have any feats to put it on that level. So no. Though the answer should be rather obvious. But meh.
He admitted he was wrong at some point broI find it funny how you change your mind according to what is convenient to you. I remember having argued with you that Hirudora destroyed Madara's susano and you were like "no it didn't, madara just deactivated it" and now that saying Hirudora > Susano is convenient to prove your point, you just say it, while when it wasn't convenient then you said otherwise (wich was really stupid seriously, it was obvious hirudora destroyed madara's susano).
I know, i'm not flaming the guy. I'm just saying that i was even put in his sig for saying Hirudora>Susano and now he admits it because he needs to.He admitted he was wrong at some point bro
I admit it because I was proven wrong, unlike when I argued with you, which was a year ago at least, so don't come at me with this "You admit it because you need to" nonsense. Lol. Your arguments were piss poor, so I didn't concede. That simple. Same thing I tell to all the clown ass posters who reply to me with shit like this. (unorthodox, Fodder Debater) Don't be upset because you couldn't post well enough to prove your point.I know, i'm not flaming the guy. I'm just saying that i was even put in his sig for saying Hirudora>Susano and now he admits it because he needs to.
It was obvious i was right from the beggining... anyways Hirudora > That atack Kakuzu uses in terms of power, but they are different atacks and each one has different advantages.
People get convinced one way or ther other...Not being able to convince someone doesn't mean much when that was a year ago.I find it funny how you change your mind according to what is convenient to you. I remember having argued with you that Hirudora destroyed Madara's susano and you were like "no it didn't, madara just deactivated it" and now that saying Hirudora > Susano is convenient to prove your point, you just say it, while when it wasn't convenient then you said otherwise (wich was really stupid seriously, it was obvious hirudora destroyed madara's susano).
I remember our debate, you're right it was at least one year ago and if i recall well you were the one with the poor argument "madara was sitting on a cliff, thaat's evidence his susano wasn't destroyed", a few days later you admited you were wrong on another thread (wich was also almost one year ago) and sudenly I was out of your sig, so that got me thinking that there was no need to argue against me knowing you were wrong (because you admited it a few days later anyways) so you just did it because it was convenient to you in another VS thread wich i don't remember. And now i see you doing that again and i found it funny, relax brrroI admit it because I was proven wrong, unlike when I argued with you, which was a year ago at least, so don't come at me with this "You admit it because you need to" nonsense. Lol. Your arguments were piss poor, so I didn't concede. That simple. Same thing I tell to all the clown ass posters who reply to me with shit like this. (unorthodox, Fodder Debater) Don't be upset because you couldn't post well enough to prove your point.
Lmao, this kid. If you are going to cry about the whole situation, then I suggest we be honest first of all. That is a conclusion, not an argument. Don't put quotes around it like it's something I said. Don't twist argumentation to make yourself seem not as foolish.I remember our debate, you're right it was at least one year ago and if i recall well you were the one with the poor argument "madara was sitting on a cliff, thaat's evidence his susano wasn't destroyed", a few days later you admited you were wrong on another thread (wich was also almost one year ago) and sudenly I was out of your sig, so that got me thinking that there was no need to argue against me knowing you were wrong (because you admited it a few days later anyways) so you just did it because it was convenient to you in another VS thread wich i don't remember. And now i see you doing that again and i found it funny, relax brrro
Seriously, your argument was Madara was sitting on a cliff, that's evidence his susano wasn't destroyed (of coure you supported it with mor arguments, i'm not saying you didn't support your point) <<-- and that's EXACTLY how it was. But nvm, i know what i remember anyways. Sorry for the stupid quoteLmao, this kid. If you are going to cry about the whole situation, then I suggest we be honest first of all. That is a conclusion, not an argument. Don't put quotes around it like it's something I said. Don't twist argumentation to make yourself seem not as foolish.
I did it because I was proven wrong. It's really that simple. Don't get upset because you yourself couldn't prove your point, and start accusing people of changing up their arguments for "convenience" Lol. If someone changes their mind, something caused it. It's as simple as that.