Black Lives

[Anorien16]

You are insulting your own intelligence. You did not watch it(I'm assuming). You share the same sentiments as the satirical Chris Hayes.

Did you even watch what your own link to comprehend it? It in no way defies the sentiments or opinions I hold, even if the satire is taken face value .... You and flash are trying to establish that when white people riot (Personally I think no riots are racially homogenous, even Baltimore riots seemingly had white people) there are not not so severe consequences and people dont call them stuff like 'thugs', and I think you two are deliberately trying to delude others by cherry picking some of the crazier side of the media (Fox, Mox and Gawker ... next what Onion news? Even i can cherry pick people who condoned the Baltimore Riots if I look for it in the crazy side) .... When anyone riots the reactions from the sensible people are the same, people dont care if your color is white black or blue, hooligans will be treated as hooligans both by the court and the people and condemned depending upon the scale.

 

[Multiply]

Did you even watch what you link? It in no way defies the sentiments or opinions I hold, even this .... You and flash are trying to establish that when white people riot there are not not so severe consequences and people dont call them stuff like 'thugs', and I think you two are deliberately trying to delude others by cherry picking some of the crazier side of the media (Fox, Mox and Gawker ... next what Onion news? Even i can cherry pick people who condoned the Baltimore Riots if I look for it in the crazy side) .... When anyone riots the reactions from the sensible people are the same, people dont care if your color is white black or blue, hooligans will be treated as hooligans both by the court and the people and condemned depending upon the scale.

How is it cherry picking when I can go to all the riots about sports and see that they are not calling these people thugs. Yet when people are rioting over a social injustice they become thugs?

 

[-Liquid Cefka-]

It's senselss to talk to someone like you. But I try.

Why should we care that Blacks die?
That's the same question.
I'm not saying that we shouldn't, the point is no one cares about whites, hispanics, etc.
Blacks aren't more important than the others.

Every race has been oppressed since we exists, so what's your point?



Very true. U_U

and wht is it pointless again? you didn't even address any actual point I made, only that Idc about white death xd.

Talkin to you may be pointless.

 

[chopstickchakra]

How is it cherry picking when I can go to all the riots about sports and see that they are not calling these people thugs. Yet when people are rioting over a social injustice they become thugs?

You know that's not entirely accurate right?

You must be registered for see links

They are called thugs and they are looked at as out of control and described as despicable. They are also talking specifically about the people doing the criminal acts, vandalism, looting etc. just like we're describing now. I know a lot of people want to pretend or assume they're talking about everyone there but when most of us say the thugs there, we mean the ones destroying things.

Even f the term thug isn't thrown around in the descriptions you can go back and look at almost everyone of those sport riots and see citizens of the city are disappointed in the actions of the rioters, most of whom in a sporting event are from out of town. It makes you look a bit worse when you destroy your own area, not that it really matters where you riot.

 

[Multiply]

You know that's not entirely accurate right?

You must be registered for see links

They are called thugs and they are looked at as out of control and described as despicable. They are also talking specifically about the people doing the criminal acts, vandalism, looting etc. just like we're describing now. I know a lot of people want to pretend or assume they're talking about everyone there but when most of us say the thugs there, we mean the ones destroying things.

Even f the term thug isn't thrown around in the descriptions you can go back and look at almost everyone of those sport riots and see citizens of the city are disappointed in the actions of the rioters, most of whom in a sporting event are from out of town. It makes you look a bit worse when you destroy your own area, not that it really matters where you riot.

Fair enough, maybe I need to move to Canada. They seem to call it how they see it Lol.

 

[Anorien16]

How is it cherry picking when I can go to all the riots about sports and see that they are not calling these people thugs. Yet when people are rioting over a social injustice they become thugs?

Oh really?

Ok lets see:

Omg there is a entire wiki pedia pages called Football Hooliganisms

You must be registered for see links

... Just so you know hooligans and thugs are nearly synonymous.

Omg look Blinkered America is already among the thugs

You must be registered for see links

.... there is a entire article from the Guardian using the word Thug in the title itself.

Again rioting Hooligans ....

You must be registered for see links

Here is entire ranking page:

You must be registered for see links

... It is quite clearly calling the events as Hooliganism.

.... Need more?

Also note that what happened in Baltimore is different from Sports riots as sport riots does not usually involves looting and burning down of entire buildings.
Yet I challenge you to find an article that is in anyway is tolerant of such behavior and does not call them criminals.

Yet when people are rioting over a social injustice they become thugs?

Wait wait wait .... You are stating that the people burned down a old age home and looted stores were actually protestors? Then wont that mean that the whole movement failed to discipline their own people and the responsibility lies with them?

 

[Punk Hazard]

But when white people do it, nobody call them thugs. That's the point here. Rioting is wrong on so many levels. But nobody bat an eye when white folks are rioting.

Please point to me to an incident where rioters who were overwhelming white in population rioted for multiple days in ways that destroyed cars, injured people, looted, and burned down buildings, and no one bat an eye and they weren't reported in the media in a negative light. I'll wait.

 

[-immortal-]

lol just another ant on the internet hatin
Nothing new

 

[Solo]

Please point to me to an incident where rioters who were overwhelming white in population rioted for multiple days in ways that destroyed cars, injured people, looted, and burned down buildings, and no one bat an eye and they weren't reported in the media in a negative light. I'll wait.

There definitely are some. Just look them up.

I just find it amazing that rioting over Police Officers doing questionable shit has been going on for over a hundred years in America. This is literally been going on OVER a hundred year. This is why Black People aren't getting results. You can't move forward into the future holding onto the past. Rioting definitely isn't an answer. I promise I'm not being racist.

 

[Multiply]

Oh really?

Ok lets see:

Omg there is a entire wiki pedia pages called Football Hooliganisms

You must be registered for see links

... Just so you know hooligans and thugs are nearly synonymous.

Omg look Blinkered America is already among the thugs

You must be registered for see links

.... there is a entire article from the Guardian using the word Thug in the title itself.

Again rioting Hooligans ....

You must be registered for see links

Here is entire ranking page:

You must be registered for see links

... It is quite clearly calling the events as Hooliganism.

.... Need more?

Also note that what happened in Baltimore is different from Sports riots as sport riots does not usually involves looting and burning down of entire buildings.
Yet I challenge you to find an article that is in anyway is tolerant of such behavior and does not call them criminals.




Wait wait wait .... You are stating that the people burned down a old age home and looted stores were actually protestors? Then wont that mean that the whole movement failed to discipline their own people and the responsibility lies with them?

How is it cherry picking when I can go to all the riots about sports and see that they are not calling these people thugs.

None of these back alley news outlets are the 'they' I was talking about. Try again. Try Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, or ABC.

 

[Bronze]

African-Americans will matter if they stop murdering, stealing and selling drugs.

 

[Mayweather]

Please point to me to an incident where rioters who were overwhelming white in population rioted for multiple days in ways that destroyed cars, injured people, looted, and burned down buildings, and no one bat an eye and they weren't reported in the media in a negative light. I'll wait.

No one likes an uncle tom. The white man stole us from africa and forced us to pick cotton.

 

[Multiply]

No one likes an uncle tom. The white man stole bought us from africa and forced us to pick cotton.

Fixed it for you, but it's pretty much the same.

 

[ComplexCity]

I am of the opinion that the majority of these so called 'shooting of unarmed person's" cases, regardless of race, are actually legitimate. I think the police are doing their job, and the courts are actually the ones failing the people.

Given that most people who die at the hands of police have criminal records (and often lengthy ones), I feel they are just as equally responsible in contributing to their own death as everyone claims the police are; and therefore, it is justified.

You reap what you sow, sadly. Live by the sword, die by the sword.

Police doing their job? Ok buddy :|