Shikamaru's novel has incorrect facts

Icelerate

Active member
Elite
Joined
Jun 10, 2012
Messages
9,255
Kin
37💸
Kumi
30💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
It said only 10000 shinobi died in the 4th great ninja war, but in the manga, already half of the 80000 shinobi were killed off in the first day of the war.
 

Char Aznable

Active member
Elite
Joined
Mar 14, 2014
Messages
6,779
Kin
99💸
Kumi
69💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Where the f*ck would Konoha even get 10,000 shinobi?

I don't recall even a hundred ninja fighting during the Invasion by the Sound in Part 1, and Pein + 5 bodies + Konan managed to wreck the village no diff before he shinra tensei'ed it.
 

lndra

Active member
Supreme
Joined
Jun 1, 2014
Messages
31,929
Kin
15💸
Kumi
9💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
No it was 10000 shinobi from the alliance.

The Five Great Shinobi Countries had lost roughly 10,000 shinobi…

10,000 shinobi were the victims of the Fourth Shinobi World War.


Naruto could perform the shadow clone jutsu by twisting his fingers, and the Blood Prison is apparently "real" in the novels.

Inconsistencies are bound to happen when the main author did not write them. They are just supposed to be fillers on pages.
 

Icelerate

Active member
Elite
Joined
Jun 10, 2012
Messages
9,255
Kin
37💸
Kumi
30💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Naruto could perform the shadow clone jutsu by twisting his fingers, and the Blood Prison is apparently "real" in the novels.

Inconsistencies are bound to happen when the main author did not write them. They are just supposed to be fillers on pages.
A location such as Blood Prison was not confirmed to not exist in the main story so it being part of the novel doesn't contradict any manga facts thus you can't say it is a contradiction from canon. This however is a blatant falsity.
 

lndra

Active member
Supreme
Joined
Jun 1, 2014
Messages
31,929
Kin
15💸
Kumi
9💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
A location such as Blood Prison was not confirmed to not exist in the main story so it being part of the novel doesn't contradict any manga facts thus you can't say it is a contradiction from canon. This however is a blatant falsity.
The movie however was stated to not be canon. So there goes the contradiction ~
 

lndra

Active member
Supreme
Joined
Jun 1, 2014
Messages
31,929
Kin
15💸
Kumi
9💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
The movie isn't the novel so the movie not being canon doesn't mean the novel isn't canon.
When the novel was created from information of the movie? Alright.

Well the novels are not canon anyway. OrganicDinosaur already confirmed it, but we knew this already from the get-go.

These are not the first Naruto novels mind you, and none of them have been canon before.
 

Icelerate

Active member
Elite
Joined
Jun 10, 2012
Messages
9,255
Kin
37💸
Kumi
30💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
When the novel was created from information of the movie? Alright.

Well the novels are not canon anyway. OrganicDinosaur already confirmed it, but we knew this already from the get-go.

These are not the first Naruto novels mind you, and none of them have been canon before.
I'm not actually arguing that they are canon but that particular evidence you used to discredit it was weak. If it wasn't stated to be canon than it is up for your own interpretation. Who owns the Trademark Naruto anyway?
 

lndra

Active member
Supreme
Joined
Jun 1, 2014
Messages
31,929
Kin
15💸
Kumi
9💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
I'm not actually arguing that they are canon but that particular evidence you used to discredit it was weak. If it wasn't stated to be canon than it is up for your own interpretation. Who owns the Trademark Naruto anyway?
How could that not be enough to discredit it when the information is based of non-canon material?
 
Top