How is my post dumb? Because you didn't agree with what I said? If that's the case you might want to learn the defenition of dumb cause you are using the word wrong.
Oh how I have missed the pretentious members on this site. They always act so smart but the stuff they say proves otherwise
Let's do a follow up comparison between what you and 9T said. Your post:
That's because the award isn't based on his writing its based on how his manga affected people in short he only got it because hos manga is popular not because it is written good.
- Based on what it's not based on writing, even though the articles
explicitly state the exact opposite of what you claim? Which is his writing style.
- That does not in any way, shape, or form disproves why Kishi won that award.
- Of course it's popular. But it also talks about how he incorporated what was mentioned unless you have valid evidence to prove otherwise.
What kinda stupid answer is this? He got the award because of his writing style. It's how incorporated Oriental Culture, folklore, and history into his manga and gave depth to a shounen manga. This means he has a unique writing style that puts him on top of most mangaka, otherwise he wouldn't have won the award. Screw the fights, appreciate the story a bit more...
- He used evidence to prove his stance.
- Stated exactly why Kishi won the award based on proof, not his own assertions.
So yeah, how is it not dumb? You haven't seen my last thousands of post. So you can't actually prove your stance. Lol