Did I said that he's fight them at the same time? No. Rayleigh's words are " I'd like to go there but I am not as young as I used to be'. In order to go there and help them he must incapacitate Kizaru at least for a while and proceed to help SH's to escape. He was
implying that he's have done that if he's younger, One can't pull such a feat if his strength is on par with admirals that's it. I have never implied that he's beat them at the same time.
He doesn't have to harm Kizaru to that degree, Rayleigh was fast enough to intercept him quite a few times because of how fast he is & his CoO presumably. At a younger state, he can move a lot quicker. Thus, he may just outspeed Kizaru (ironically) to the point where he can allow the SH's to escape because of Kizaru's recharge. I never said he was on par with an admiral? I'm aware prime Rayleigh is stronger but he's still in the same tier, admiral tier or it's possible he was close to PK tier but I doubt it.
Are u retarded or something? The gap b/w admirals is too damn small to a point where you can't even put someone b/w them. It means that if someone is strong enough to beat Kizaru with mid dif them same shit will happen against any other admiral. You can use any admiral to justify power scaling.
Kizaru is a goofy character so it looks like he wasn't being serious that doesn't mean that he wasn't fighting with his full force. The thing is that he was fighting on par with admiral despite of being at disadvantage. If Old Rayleigh can fight on par with admiral then it means that Young one is much stronger than admirals. Anyone with some common sense can understand this.
Your point? I was implying that Kizaru never tries and he's the weakest of the bunch, so how is that a fair representation exactly? Using Akainu would be much better, since we've seen him actually try and fight at full force. He wasn't fighting on par, he was clearly getting fatigued easily. That doesn't suggest prime rayleigh is much stronger. The gap isn't that huge. Anyone with some common sense can understand this.
It wasn't plot, admirals were busy with their own opponents back then. Sengoku ordered Garp not to fight and they have decided to fight only when it's necessary. It has nothing to do with plot. Stop using lameass excuses.
Use your brain, why would the Marines fight another yonko? They suffered many causalities from the war with WB, it wouldn't be wise to pick on another yonko. Especially knowing that some of the warlords may withdraw since they never agreed to fight 2 yonko's, only WB.
I said none of the marines tried to attack him and you said it might be because of Coby's speech which is why I bought Akainu into discussion as he's a marine. Akainu was in no state to decide what is right or what is wrong. He decided to face all of WB commanders head on and even tried to kill his own men in front of everyone without any hesitation. Yet this guy regained his senses and started thinking wisely when Shanks was standing in front of him. That says something.
Look back at what I said, I mentioned both Coby/Shanks, not just Coby specifically. There's nothing he could of done anyways, the submarine was ready to submerge underwater. Only Kuzan/Kizaru could step in and they did. Also, defeating Shanks will accomplish what? Shanks has nothing to do with Ace's execution & Akainu just barely survived a fight with WB. The marines already won. It's not a matter of Shanks being in a different league, it was a rational decision. Yes, he decided to fight all the WB commanders head on since Luffy was still on the island.
If Akainu was still healthy, he would have no problem fighting with Shanks. He had no problem fighting with WB, then he'll have no problem with fighting any other yonko. Use common sense. P.S, you ignored the statement I've made at the end of my previous post.
