9/11 all fake / discrimination of muslims

[Melanin]

If white people don't want muslim immigrants coming into their country, they shouldn't destroy their lands to begin with. You think people who come from Iraq, Afganistan and other such places WANT to leave their homeland?

This is a awesome point.

 

[Anorien16]

Wasn't Bush the same dude who attacked a third world country because lol weapons of mass destruction might be there. So then he killed tons of citizens instead of just going for the head. And then Murica got the oil of the land. Totally not suspicious, neh?

Actually America gets only about 16-20% of its total Oil consumption from the Middle East areas (

You must be registered for see links

) .... It is not worth the bother (Wasting that much effort on at most 5-10% of oil is idiotic) . Unlike what you people think, America doesnt want the Oil itself but wants the Oil to be in the hand of its 'friends' which is one of the true source of America's influence .... Read this for getting a clue:

You must be registered for see links

 

[Made in Heaven]

Actually America gets only about 16-20% of its total Oil consumption from the Middle East areas (

You must be registered for see links

) .... It is not worth the bother (Wasting that much effort on at most 5-10% of oil is idiotic) . Unlike what you people think, America doesnt want the Oil itself but wants the Oil to be in the hand of its 'friends' which is one of the true source of America's influence .... Read this for getting a clue:

You must be registered for see links

Still a shit reason to kill innocent civilians.

 

[Avani 🥈]

If white people don't want muslim immigrants coming into their country, they shouldn't destroy their lands to begin with. You think people who come from Iraq, Afganistan and other such places WANT to leave their homeland?

What about us? We got tons of Afghan refugees because of war lord who supported Taliban you know.

We have had refugees of religious percecustion for ages - since 4 AD. First wave:Syrian Christians.
Second Wave:Zoroastrians and Jews. Third Buddhist running away from muslim invaders - some outside India after burning of Nalanda some in other locations..Then Hindus and Sikhs and buddhists from Pakistan and Bnagladesh. Then even Muslims from Pakistan - lol ( after a Karachi riot some years back )

Seriously people move around all the time. And there are all kind of reasons too- many move for better life style. Some for peace of mind. Some just because- I cannot say anything else when I see some of the Europeans migrants in my city. I always wonder why the heck they would moved here when they might have had better options but whatever..At first I thought they were related with some church but one of them was just a school teacher married to a local Sikh girl.. :shrug:

US has been poking it's nose in other country's affairs but don't forget that they gave them a window in most cases. They only took the opportunity using that wedge. You can blame US for reaping benefits from the local conflict and serve it's own interests- that's true. But most of these countries were by no means a peaceful zone even before.

 

[Anorien16]

Still a shit reason to kill innocent civilians.

There is never a good reason kill the innocent. But many of the Dictators/Gangs of the Middle East are not innocents (Some of whom have a better bodycount than USA actually) and there will always be collateral damage or utter stupidity like the idiotic Shia-Sunni conflict .... Sadly in these conflicts there is no true good side, only the lesser evil.

 

[Made in Heaven]

There is never a good reason kill the innocent. But many of the Dictators/Gangs of the Middle East are not innocents (Some of whom have a better bodycount than USA actually) and there will always be collateral damage or utter stupidity like the idiotic Shia-Sunni conflict .... Sadly in these conflicts there is no true good side, only the lesser evil.

Never said they were, I despise them as well. And i agree with the conflicts being stupid and uncalled for. My only argument was that those people shouldn't complain about immigrants coming into "their" countries when their militaries are waging war in their lands.

 

[Anorien16]

Never said they were, I despise them as well. And i agree with the conflicts being stupid and uncalled for. My only argument was that those people shouldn't complain about immigrants coming into "their" countries when their militaries are waging war in their lands.

Well honestly there is no wrong in asking a little bit quality in immigrants .... Since they allow Immigration it kinda sends the signal that they are welcome as long as they are good people. But when the said immigrants are low lives and disturbs people who just want to live in peace, dont u think the annoyance is warranted?

 

[Conspirator.]

Well honestly there is no wrong in asking a little bit quality in immigrants .... Since they allow Immigration it kinda sends the signal that they are welcome as long as they are good people. But when the said immigrants are low lives and disturbs people who just want to live in peace, dont u think the annoyance is warranted?

I absolutely agree with this post.

 

[~WastelandSociety~]

No one will truly know if it was a inside job or not. That's why its a theory.
I'm surprise how many kids buys into it " let's hate Americans/government cause this site states its a fact that it was a inside job."

And of course bush was still reading in front of those kids. It's one thing to leave on a bad note and cause panic among the little ones.
Though don't get me wrong,I don't agree with what Bush did.
He should have never wage war on those terrorist. Just protect our lands and let those country handle their own problems like it should be.
At first those muslims wanted the help and welcome the soldiers with open arms. Now they want us out cause they grew tired of the help and we are wasting money on them.
I've talked to many good muslims that moved to this states away from the issuse in fear, and they were thankful for the soldiers.
Though once a few of them heard about the theory of the inside job they start hating the government,while others don't believe it.

Oil have nothing to do with the war. Though if any country wage a war on another the first strategy is to stop the enemy from having control over oil supplies. Cut the oil, and you will slow them down.

 

[YowYan]

Wasn't Bush the same dude who attacked a third world country because lol weapons of mass destruction might be there. So then he killed tons of citizens instead of just going for the head. And then Murica got the oil of the land. Totally not suspicious, neh?

Adding that only 2% of all terroristic attacks were done by muslim radicals

Simply put. War propaganda. Find something to blame and use it as an excuse to implement the patriot act, later on NDAA, and invade other countries to spread democracy with your sheeple's consent

Well honestly there is no wrong in asking a little bit quality in immigrants .... Since they allow Immigration it kinda sends the signal that they are welcome as long as they are good people. But when the said immigrants are low lives and disturbs people who just want to live in peace, dont u think the annoyance is warranted?

You do have a point. In the area I grew up in, I witnessed the most vile trash which were all morrocan muslims. Still, I prefer to judge them individually but I get where the contempt would come from at times.

 

[Avani 🥈]

Adding that only 2% of all terroristic attacks were done by muslim radicals

Simply put. War propaganda. Find something to blame and use it as an excuse to implement the patriot act, later on NDAA, and invade other countries to spread democracy with your sheeple's consent

Don't double post please. BTW May I know source and context of your stats of 2% of your data? I only found this so far.

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see links

And from India:

You must be registered for see links

In India I know the communist terrorists are more headache in many eastern or southern states(and yea we have a whole mixed bunch of them from different ideologies. I told you before didn't I) . So really not surprised to see them up there in the list.

 

[YowYan]

Don't double post please. BTW May I know source and context of your stats of 2% of your data? I only found this so far.

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see links

In India I know the communist terrorists are more headache in many eastern or southern states. So really not surprised to see them up there in the list.

ah sorry for the double posting
And yes, I'll try find it

edit: This is where I got it from.

You must be registered for see links

And here a nice alternative view on the islamic state and who funds their cause.

You must be registered for see links

^ Linking back to what I said weeks/months back; NATO sending weapons to the syrian rebels in 2013, and where are those weapons now.

Is that your real name? Avani

And yeah, I remember you telling me those different ideologies' terrorism in asian countries.

 

[BGHKReincarnate]

The US bombed Syria recently. They are terrorists as-well.

 

[Anorien16]

You do have a point. In the area I grew up in, I witnessed the most vile trash which were all morrocan muslims. Still, I prefer to judge them individually but I get where the contempt would come from at times.

Well that is why I would not be so against a system of minimum qualification ..... I might be bit insulting but I dont think the first world countries needs more burger flippers or taxi drivers, those job markets should not be saturated by specially imported foreigners when there are native unemployment. (Funnily I am from a 3rd World Country) ..... While specially skilled people with clean records are the one's who should be preferred. Then again I am rambling.

 

[YowYan]

Well that is why I would not be so against a system of minimum qualification ..... I might be bit insulting but I dont think the first world countries needs more burger flippers or taxi drivers, those job markets should not be saturated by specially imported foreigners when there are native unemployment. (Funnily I am from a 3rd World Country) ..... While specially skilled people with clean records are the one's who should be preferred. Then again I am rambling.

hmmm Idk about that though. In my country, a 1st world nation, since the introduction of the euro everything became more expensive but the salaries remained. Our ''priveleges'' are so subtly eroded that we don't pay attention to the real cause of socio-economic issues. At its core, I wouldn't say it's that simple to point fingers at less successful minorities as the authorities aren't making life easier for them.

 

[Anorien16]

hmmm Idk about that though. In my country, a 1st world nation, since the introduction of the euro everything became more expensive but the salaries remained. Our ''priveleges'' are so subtly eroded that we don't pay attention to the real cause of socio-economic issues. At its core, I wouldn't say it's that simple to point fingers at less successful minorities as the authorities aren't making life easier for them.

I am not asking to point fingers .... I am simply pointing out that it is silly to import problems when they already exist within borders. (Damn didnt that kinda sound like Ron Paul) As you should know importing poor people dependent on the government or any other ideology actually breeds the sheep drones/henchmen of the government that you hate so much. Also that last statement was bit out of character from you imo, as you said you judge individually but not as a group, so whether the 'the less successful' are from a minority or not should not matter. Rather what the individual brings to the table should be the judging factor.

As for that arms thing with Syrian Rebels .... I hope you know this kind of dirty politics: It is standard tactics when you cant fight your enemies directly make friends with enemies of your enemies and cultivate them, USA (Nearly all countries) has been doing this for ages to maintain influence but with proper precautions and care such shit dont hit the fan. But given the recent rise in certain tendencies (*cough* incompetence) .... those operations have gone haywire and the recklessness has given the wrong groups power.

For example imagine it this way ... In the past: A country X is dominated by a group who is anti USA and is hurting their trade, so they cultivate a proper group who would not go far and will take over with minimum hassle (thus cause no noticeable attention) and thus in the end plenty of people are not dead and two parties are happy ... But now: A country X dominated by group Y who is against USA's interests ... and the idiots would fund anyone who is Anti Y, thus we get groups like Taliban who gets power thus eventually shit hits the fan. Ironically same thing happened in Pakistan: they have been funding terrorists against India (Recently there have been Pakistani army ration slips found among terrorist belongings) and others (Also USA used to fund and turn a blind eye to Pakistan for that as India used to be friendly to Russia) ... but those groups predictably took over an area and clashed with the government and eventually massacred school children in Peshawar. ..... And sadly, these things happen all over.

 

[Wabbit]

9/11 conspiracy theories are plane crazy

 

[Avani 🥈]

ah sorry for the double posting
And yes, I'll try find it

edit: This is where I got it from.

You must be registered for see links

And here a nice alternative view on the islamic state and who funds their cause.

You must be registered for see links

^ Linking back to what I said weeks/months back; NATO sending weapons to the syrian rebels in 2013, and where are those weapons now.

Is that your real name? Avani

And yeah, I remember you telling me those different ideologies' terrorism in asian countries.

So that data (2% bit) was only from US and didn't include the world wide data about fanatical terrorists nor it takes the population percentage or the newly migrant community status in US in consideration...

Anyway, I agree with the point that many innocent people get harassed the way they try to check on it.

As for US funding Islamic extremists - lol That's no secret. We know how lovingly they supported Taliban. Those Rambo movies.. lol you talk like it's something hidden. Doesn't change the fact that extremists existed in that region.

Afghanistan' history of past 2000+ years is ridden with foreign countries invading or meddling in it's affairs. Once upon a time it was Hindu/Buddhist region you know. The locals got defeated, enslaved and sold to other countries by middle eastern powers- as far as Europe even. The Gypsies trace part of their heritage back to India for a reason. Their language and music style still has traces of the region currently known as Afghanistan and Pakistan. One can only sympathies with them. Every time they try to settle down - a new player joins in the political game there.

 

[YowYan]

I am not asking to point fingers .... I am simply pointing out that it is silly to import problems when they already exist within borders. (Damn didnt that kinda sound like Ron Paul) As you should know importing poor people dependent on the government or any other ideology actually breeds the sheep drones/henchmen of the government that you hate so much. Also that last statement was bit out of character from you imo, as you said you judge individually but not as a group, so whether the 'the less successful' are from a minority or not should not matter. Rather what the individual brings to the table should be the judging factor.

As for that arms thing with Syrian Rebels .... I hope you know this kind of dirty politics: It is standard tactics when you cant fight your enemies directly make friends with enemies of your enemies and cultivate them, USA (Nearly all countries) has been doing this for ages to maintain influence but with proper precautions and care such shit dont hit the fan. But given the recent rise in certain tendencies (*cough* incompetence) .... those operations have gone haywire and the recklessness has given the wrong groups power.

For example imagine it this way ... In the past: A country X is dominated by a group who is anti USA and is hurting their trade, so they cultivate a proper group who would not go far and will take over with minimum hassle (thus cause no noticeable attention) and thus in the end plenty of people are not dead and two parties are happy ... But now: A country X dominated by group Y who is against USA's interests ... and the idiots would fund anyone who is Anti Y, thus we get groups like Taliban who gets power thus eventually shit hits the fan. Ironically same thing happened in Pakistan: they have been funding terrorists against India (Recently there have been Pakistani army ration slips found among terrorist belongings) and others (Also USA used to fund and turn a blind eye to Pakistan for that as India used to be friendly to Russia) ... but those groups predictably took over an area and clashed with the government and eventually massacred school children in Peshawar. ..... And sadly, these things happen all over.

You're right. I didn't think that through properly. Instead of spending more on foreign aid and immigrants wanting government aid, we should close the borders (not permanently) and fix our domestic problems first. I'd rather see not a single homeless person instead of wasting our money pleasing u.s.a. by spending billions of euros on military planes, bailing other european nations and arming syrian rebels like we did a while ago. At that time, 80+ year old citizens were being thrown out of healthcare benefits. Or atleast, it was being discussed as far as I can remember.

conclusion: As you said, it would be better to focus on what we have here within our borders before adopting more work.

To the rest; well said. point taken

 

[Wolves]

Well honestly there is no wrong in asking a little bit quality in immigrants .... Since they allow Immigration it kinda sends the signal that they are welcome as long as they are good people. But when the said immigrants are low lives and disturbs people who just want to live in peace, dont u think the annoyance is warranted?

I get what youre triying to say but it sounds a bit to me like: if they really need to live here they can, BUT ...
it has a little undertone to me that i dont get it out of my head.

No one will truly know if it was a inside job or not. That's why its a theory.
I'm surprise how many kids buys into it " let's hate Americans/government cause this site states its a fact that it was a inside job."

And of course bush was still reading in front of those kids. It's one thing to leave on a bad note and cause panic among the little ones.
Though don't get me wrong,I don't agree with what Bush did.

I never said I hate the US.

@bold then why are you critizing my beliefs? none of us got 100% proof so no need to talk about it anymore i just said what i think about the event, not about an opinion

You do have a point. In the area I grew up in, I witnessed the most vile trash which were all morrocan muslims. Still, I prefer to judge them individually but I get where the contempt would come from at times.

no i still couldn't agree with this it's not like you know every f*ckin morrocan muslim in this world in order to judge them ALL. i really dont get generalization it makes no sense at all!
and also why can nobody feel like theyre in their shoes? those "thugs" didnt start doing this shit for fun. they were manipulated by the hood so long that they someday began to enjoy it.

9/11 conspiracy theories are plane crazy

i see what u did there.