- Joined
- Jul 4, 2009
- Messages
- 8,562
- Reaction score
- 639
Sakura is a ripoff of lee.
Their not overlooked in my opinon.
So disregarding and ignoring all the stress and time it would take to master the sharingan, rinnengan and the tailed beast ..
Because I mean hey the manga / anime didn't show Sasuke struggling to use the sharingan and didn't show Naruto struggling with Kurama at all.
But hey at least Sakura learned to heal people.
Lee deserve praise for his hard ass work, Sakura was about as useful as her part 1 self.
Minato says hi.
naruto worked hard to get to where he was.
Sakura is a ripoff of lee.
They are good but they are students of some of the most op ppl in the manga and basically had there skills passed down from top tier ppl, imho if Kabuto were to have taken Sakura's place he would have been much more superior since he was compared to her prime on part 1. While they did work hard for their skills, it's only because of the fact that they both got hands on specialized training by their teachers that makes the difference, and that specialized training wasn't available to the majority of their peers which basically leaves them to fend for themselves.
What up fan?
Sakura? One of the strongest of her Generation? I'm sorry but what manga did you read?You must be registered for see imagesYou must be registered for see images
Love how you bring Lee into this matter to make out Sakura look like she's a most powerful shinobi is a huge insult to Naruto, Sasuke, Madara and everyone.
Just understand that if Sakura was born with Sasukes genes she would've been leagues ahead of him by the age of 17 (then the actual 17 year old Sasuke).Hebi Sasuke beats them both at the same time
Absolutely..You must be registered for see images
You must be registered for see images
You must be registered for see images
You must be registered for see images
Everyone knows that due to his Taijutsu and the gates. However, if Sakura hits him with her full power, Lee ain't getting back up.