- Joined
- Jan 26, 2009
- Messages
- 20,752
- Reaction score
- 4,013
Why am I trolling? Your point doesn't even make any sense.
Still much better pieces of literature that Kishimoto can never even dream of touching. I haven't read from Duma, so I wouldn't know. But let's not sling dirt at Three Musketeers because you love to lean on Kishimoto a lot. Sure, those are anti-feministic pieces, but so what? An over-whelming majority of women didn't belong to any other estate other than wives and clergy anyway, so I don't see your point. Their limited scope within society reduced them to this. If you want to put blame on someone, blame women.
Paper-bag princess? Never heard of it.
This manga already has covered all major literary devices. There is no such thing as literary bases. Either a work is fiction or it is non-fiction. In case of the former, it has certain genre conventions. That is all.
P.s: Are you talking about Alexandre Dumas and the entirety of his works? I don't even ... :|
If not trolling then I will go with pretentious. :shrug:
That's a kid's story from 1980 or around.
Nah I was referring to the Three Musketeers in particular. I liked most of the story till I reached the finale of Milady's 'execution' - that kind of left a really bad taste in my mouth. But that's for some other discussion.
I loved most of the Shaw's women though. I read all I could find just for them. <3
Last edited:
