Answer this:
"How is the following a discussion?
"I already answered your shit post of a response.
How dare you call me illogical when I'm one of the best logical users in this site, but hey. Let's let the rep bars do the talking
No one can dare listen to a word you say. You can't even agree with what's presented in front of you because you always have to be right."
Why do you bring me not being a native english speaker up in a post where you write "I made posted a discussion" ?
You also wrote the following
" Says I'm bringing up nonsense and non-logical facts? When everything I said came straight out of the manga itself, in fact I brought up points in the story to YOU. "
Show me where it is said and show me the facts, "facts" not assumptions and/or what if scenarios."
You went off topic. This thread is about Sakuras feats, not what if scenarios about Hinata.
What first question are you talking about? Show it to me and I will answer.
Sigh let me educate you again.
- You tried responding my post with illogical content. I was expressing the differences in between those characters of how side characters can't bridge the gap of the 3 main characters in character development. I mean look at Kiba, he would be owned by one Naruto clone at this point. You said Itachi and Shikamaru were different, when in turn you forgot those characters were leagues away from the normal side characters/main characters from the start.
- I still comprehand the English language better than what you have proven, you couldn't even answer a single post 4 pages ago. A spelling or grammar misplacement? Wow that shows my intelligence. Asking one question, and being mislead for four pages? Mhm, someone in here is wrong.
- I showcased Sakura's feats as we all know. Part One Sakura, is useless in battle. She could barely attempt to help her teammates and her character development tried to change when she cut off her hair :l. I told you countless times already, I WANTED a discussion on how Sakura is a better character than Hinata.
Straight up discussion (and here you are claiming me to be illogical when I said up front why is this so. Shame on you)
On how these characters are different and the same.
Both of them were considerably weak in Part one.
So how would Sakura fair against Neji?
Next is Part two where Sakura actually got development. Still the same girl mentally, in terms of battle.
How would she fair against Pain?
You don't understand what I'm trying to say, nor am I bashing the character. Hinata's feats in the manga come only to a certain point, while Sakura gets the plot development she deserves because she is one of the three main characters in the manga.
You couldn't even explain to me what made Sakura better than Hinata besides the simple fact of what was given to her in plot, when in fact the opponents that Hinata fought against, Sakura with the correct character development would lose equally too.
Yet here we are, still talking, and yet you are trying to prove something that was never there. Simple idiocy.