- Joined
- Jun 12, 2012
- Messages
- 14,296
- Reaction score
- 1,200
-An unlimited supply of Sharingan would most likely be going against what the OP intended.
B/U/I: & That's where you fail, until the OP says it this is nothing but speculation on your part, therefore isn't considered. OP specified NO restrictions, unless the lab is restricted then nothing is going against the OP, merely what you want to go against the OP.
"Oh, OP never said that nagato doesn't have his cooldown, therefore saying that he does in this fight goes against the OP" <-- Your logic with this statement.
-You already acknowledged Obito going to Nagato's corpse to retrieve his Rinnegan shouldn't be allowed because it would no longer be "MS Obito" hence it would be going against the OP's intentions.
Again this is a fail, the only reason why the above is different is because it's not MS obito anymore, now unless you have something that proves MS obito isn't the same after he replaces his eye then this example is completely invalid. & Again you go on trying to explain the OP's intentions without having a single clue what those intentions could possibly be or if those intentions did mean for obito to have access to his eye.
-There is a chance an unlimited supply of Sharingan will not be going against the OP's intentions, but that's a slim chance because it is very unfair anyway you look at it
Again, your opinion. Until you have the OP's opinion on the matter this is all speculation & has no place here in a VS thread. No restrictions = the lab is fair game regardless of what the OP was thinking at the time. If he doesn't want this to be a strategy well then he can edit the OP or tell us himself, but until then speculation isn't going to be the reason why this argument isn't viable.
So more than likely, your preposition will not be valid in a thread.
& Without proof, it is valid no matter what you say.