10 useless posts later.I don't see anything ambiguous about them.![]()
I talk to a wall.Your words were ambiguous:
I don't understand how Part a/ implies part b/.You're saying the first Uzumaki (that you've simply named "Uzumaki") had a sister who was the mother of Hagoromo's two sons Ashura and Indra.
(PART a/) If this was the case, that would mean Ashura would have gotten those Uzumaki genes from his mother, and since he is the Senju ancestor, (PART b/) that means at some point down the line the Uzumaki separated from the Senju line to form their own branch, as I had said before.
You jump to conclusion and that's causing misunderstanding , you should have seen where the problem came from.
That's a possibility , you should weight your words.
So why part a/ implies part b/?
Last edited: