Why is revenge acceptable for Shikamaru and Team Asuma
- Thread starter Blackwatch
- Start date
Darth Uchiha
Active member
You can look at however you want. You're not innocent if you attack a person. No matter what the reason is. At the end of the day, them type of people don't give a shit about being innocent or not as long what they're protecting is still there.
Did you just said that killing isn't always wrong, then said the word "God" in the same sentence. lol Interesting. Wrong or not, you're taking another person's life away. That is always wrong, no matter what.
Darth Uchiha
Active member
I'm an atheist, and, killing isn't wrong in self-defense, nor is it wrong when defending the innocent, or, should you just allow yourself, and/or innocent people to die?
Im a atheist too. Well not really. My Philosophy is based on existentialism, transcendentalism, and buddhism. Self-awareness play a big role in my philosophy. Which is why I can't be 100% white or 100% black on subjects.
But anyway, yeah Killing isn't wrong in those events. But taking a life away is still wrong, You just have to deal with it and move on.
The guard obviously has to bang the hoe :skorm:
What is your definition of innocent for one?
Two before this continues:
If x person attacks the president and the guards protect the president, and then die. Would you consider those guards guilty of what crime?
KingHashirama
Active member
nope, according to the definition they did not.
They were not responsible for the event that Sasuke caused, and hence were innocent.
And also, Sasuke is the one who trespassed on their property =].
Darth Uchiha
Active member
Except your argument only works if you accept a black and white viewpoint...
KingHashirama
Active member
The baby or a bystander are certainly far more innocent than the guard if they got killed
Baby-has nothing to do with the president
Bystander-has nothing to do with the president, he just pass by, that's all
The guard-he's ready for attacker, and even looking out for attackers. A die hard
Fuking great thread OP. I guess sasuke's wasn't justified because danzo was the acting hokage at the time. The only person naruto wanted to kill was orochimaru so he took revenge out of his system a while back
let's say I kill a person in self-defense. Then court day come up, I'll say, "I know have taken a life away. So Im not innocent. But it was in self-defense. It was either gonna be his life or my life. I find myself "Not Guilty". It's biology, human nature, instincts that tell me to survive no matter what the cost. If Im Guilty, then the System we have is truly a failed one. The system is telling us to deny our human nature".
King Of Pop
Active member
of course his clans massacre is part of the reason, whats wrong in having a motivation for a goal? theres no revenge involved, so take those words out of there. sasuke is not destroying the world nor does he seek to destroy it, he wants to reform it, to make it better. dont go againnst the manga