Contrary to your belief, ISIS is exactly what Islam is.
Now, you and some others may have belief systems outside of the Koran that have caused you to twist and distort the religion to suit your world view - but ISIS is following the Koran very well.
Their ability to recruit thousands of foreign fighters, to include women from Britain to run *** slave rings:
You must be registered for see links
" Thousands of Iraqi women are being forced into *** slavery in brothels run by a 'police force' of British women jihadis, it has been reported.
As many as 3,000 women and girls have been taken captive from the Yazidi tribe in Iraq as Isis militants continue their reign of terror across the region.
Sources now say that British female jihadis operating a religious police force called the al-Khanssaa brigade, that punishes women for 'un-Islamic' behaviour, have set up brothels to for the use of Isis fighters. "
You must be registered for see links
" Just 18, Hamad al-Tamimi says he was a religious studies student in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, before jihadists influenced and recruited him online.
Now he's in the hands of Iraqi authorities, accused of being an ISIS fighter captured in Iraq's west.
Al-Tamimi is one of numerous foreign fighters believed to have swelled the Sunni extremist group's ranks in recent months. "
You must be registered for see links
" Up to 15 percent of French people said they have a positive attitude toward the Islamic State, formerly known as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The share of ISIS supporters is largest among France’s younger generation, a new poll says.
Twice as many French people expressed a positive reaction to Islamic State (IS) militants than in Britain, where the number of people favorably disposed to the IS stands at 7 percent, and Germany, where a meager 2 percent of the respondents sided with the IS, according to a poll carried out in July among 1,000 people aged over 15 years (over 18 in Britain) in each country. The poll was conducted by ICM Research for the Russian news agency Rossiya Segodnya.
. . .
Among the three countries, France, whose population numbers 68 million people, has the largest Muslim community (7.5 percent), whereas the UK’s Muslim population is 5 percent and that of Germany is 4.6 percent, according to a Pew Research study published in January 2011. "
This stuff is actually kind of haunting. The video was uploaded back in 2011 - but the documentary seems to have been filmed roughly 2005 and published 2006.
Yet it could pretty much be a documentary on: "What is the Islamic State and why is it here?"
September 11 1683. Look up what happened outside Vienna.
.
.
.
.
.
.
That's right.
The Turkish Army was repelled from Vienna by the Christian-commanded Polish army.
History was one messenger's folly away from the complete Islamization of Europe.
While the U.S. has allowed its foreign policy to fly -way- out of control - our danger comes from getting involved in things we shouldn't.
While our soldiers aren't perfect - we do not sink to the barbarism of the tactics used by petty war-lords to spread their influence. There is outcry and there are investigations into actions taken by our soldiers.
You need to understand the history of Islam. Look up the Ottoman Empire. It was kind of a big thing at one point in time. Part of that whole Turkish army thing I mentioned, before.
You and I
We wouldn't be able to own horses - presumably cars, today, in that empire. We would have to pay a special tax. Oh... and then there's this:
You must be registered for see links
You must be registered for see links
" 1.When Sultan Suleiman(called “the Magnificent”) failed to capture Vienna in 1529 he took 50,000 Christian and European girls and women as *** slaves back with him.
2.When the Turks were defeated in front of Vienna again in 1683 by the Polish king John Sobieski (who said:”I came,I saw,God conquered“),30,000 Poles defeating 90,000 Turks,they took 80,000 Christian and European girls and women back as *** slaves.
3.Scholar Alan Fisher has conservatively calculated that between 1463-1694 the Tatars of the Crimea,who were subjects of the Sultan, enslaved 3 million men,women and children from Poland,Ukraine and Russia and sold them to the Ottoman Turks. "
I'm gonna have to say that I'd prefer to live in the U.S. as a fascist, communist state than to have to put up with that.
That, right there, is why the 2nd amendment exists.
Someone comes to take your daughter off the farm. **** his face with a bullet.
Everything everyone is pulling here is nothing but assumptions and theories pulled together on sources provided by third party sites and dominant news streams, with the exception of Aim64C who has served his nation and has experience, but once again not the whole image. Neither do I, nor anyone else on this forum. I strongly suggest, if you're vocabulary doesn't go beyond using the word 'terrorists' or 'let's nuke 'em' then don't get involved with political warfare. Don't spread ignorance.
September 11 1683. Look up what happened outside Vienna.
.
.
.
.
.
.
That's right.
The Turkish Army was repelled from Vienna by the Christian-commanded Polish army.
History was one messenger's folly away from the complete Islamization of Europe.
While the U.S. has allowed its foreign policy to fly -way- out of control - our danger comes from getting involved in things we shouldn't.
While our soldiers aren't perfect - we do not sink to the barbarism of the tactics used by petty war-lords to spread their influence. There is outcry and there are investigations into actions taken by our soldiers.
You need to understand the history of Islam. Look up the Ottoman Empire. It was kind of a big thing at one point in time. Part of that whole Turkish army thing I mentioned, before.
You and I
We wouldn't be able to own horses - presumably cars, today, in that empire. We would have to pay a special tax. Oh... and then there's this:
You must be registered for see links
You must be registered for see links
" 1.When Sultan Suleiman(called “the Magnificent”) failed to capture Vienna in 1529 he took 50,000 Christian and European girls and women as *** slaves back with him.
2.When the Turks were defeated in front of Vienna again in 1683 by the Polish king John Sobieski (who said:”I came,I saw,God conquered“),30,000 Poles defeating 90,000 Turks,they took 80,000 Christian and European girls and women back as *** slaves.
3.Scholar Alan Fisher has conservatively calculated that between 1463-1694 the Tatars of the Crimea,who were subjects of the Sultan, enslaved 3 million men,women and children from Poland,Ukraine and Russia and sold them to the Ottoman Turks. "
I'm gonna have to say that I'd prefer to live in the U.S. as a fascist, communist state than to have to put up with that.
That, right there, is why the 2nd amendment exists.
Someone comes to take your daughter off the farm. **** his face with a bullet.
The other thread appears to be closed so i'll answer here because i can't let spreading too much lies.
Let's see your biased documentary :
The youtube uploader seems very neutral with his anti-islam videos, it talk by itself.
It start pretty well with the well known rabidly anti-muslim zionists (pro-Israeli) Robert Spencer the same psychopat guy who inspired Breivik in his massacre.He always denied these accusations by the way.
Now should i take you serioussly? Is it all what you find about what is Islam and how it spread around the world ?
Against your 2-3 zionists guys, I can give you hundreds of quotes from western historians,christians and jews who lived under the califat, politics, novelist, philisophers, kings etc...
Then an other peacefull zionist Bat Ye'or wanting to give lesson to muslim.Historical incidents where dhimmi suffered persecution at particular times are generalised and quoted out of context in order to back up their claims.
There is an amazing demonstrations proving Bat Ye' or lies you have to read it which i doubt you'll seeing how biased you are.
"
The classical scholars of Islam also detailed the rights of the Muslims towards the dhimmi. The famous Maliki jurist, Shaha al-Deen al-Qarafi states:
The covenant of protection imposes upon us certain obligations toward the ahl al-dhimmah. They are our neighbours, under our shelter and protection upon the guarantee of Allah, His Messenger (saw), and the religion of Islam. Whoever violates these obligations against any one of them by so much as an abusive word, by slandering his reputation, or by doing him some injury or assisting in it, has breached the guarantee of Allah, His Messenger (saw), and the religion of Islam.
The Messenger of Allah (saw) said: “He who harms a person under covenant, or charged him more than he can, I will argue against him on the Day of Judgement.”
The Messenger of Allah (saw) said: “He who hurts a dhimmi hurts me, and he who hurts me annoys Allah.”
About Judiciary, one of the accusations against Islam’s treatment of dhimmi is that a dhimmi is not allowed to give evidence against a Muslim and his oath is not acceptable in an Islamic court.
There they talk about your 2nd zionist prophete Bat Ye’or when she stated:
"Every legal case involving a Muslim and a dhimmi was judged according to Koranic law. Although the very idea of justice implies equality between parties, a dhimmi was not allowed to give evidence against a Muslim. Since his oath was unacceptable in an Islamic court his Muslim opponent could not easily be condemned. In order to defend himself, the dhimmi was obliged to purchase Muslim witnesses at great expense."
The rule of law applies to everyone within the Khilafah and there are no exceptions. It is obligatory for the Islamic State to judge in cases concerning the dhimmi with justice and no discrimination against them is allowed.
Allah (swt) says in the Holy Qur’an:
And if you judge, judge with justice between them.
Verily, Allah loves those who act justly.
The most famous example of this justice is in the legal trial of a Jew who stole the coat of armour of Imam Ali (ra) as he was travelling to a battle. The judge Shurayh made no exception for Ali (ra) even though he was the Khaleefah, a Muslim and also off to fight in a battle so was in desperate need of his armour. Shurayh ruled in favour of the Jew and accepted his testimony in court. Full details of the trial can be read here.
The dhimmi is allowed to be a witness in an Islamic court against a Muslim and their evidence is acceptable. The conditions of being a witness apply equally to Muslims and dhimmi. The conditions of a witness are: sane, mature and ‘adl (trustworthy).
It may be claimed that the condition of ‘Adl applies only to Muslims who refrain from committing the kabeera (major) sins. This is incorrect. ‘Adl in this context means someone who abstains from that which the people consider a violation of uprightness, whether he was a Muslim or non-Muslim. This is because ‘adaala (trustworthiness) was stipulated in the testimony of the Muslim as well as in the testimony of the non-Muslim, by using the same word without distinguishing one from the other.
Allah (swt) says in the Holy Qur’an:
O you who believe! Let there be witnesses between you when death draws to one of you, at the time of bequest, two witnesses, ‘adl (trustworthy) from among you, or two others from other than you.
He (swt) meant non-Muslims by saying other than you. He said ‘two ‘adl witnesses from Muslims or two ‘adl from other than Muslims.’ So how can the ‘adaala be defined as not committing a kabeera (major) sin and insistence on committing a sagheera (small) sin regarding a non-Muslim? Also how can we reject as a witness the one who disobeyed his parents once, but accept as witness the spy, just because spying is not from kabeera sins? Therefore, the valid meaning of ‘adl is the one that abstained from that which the people consider violation to the uprightness.17
Criminal Punishments
Another accusation is that Muslims are given a lesser punishment for crimes against dhimmi. In the case of murder it is alleged that a Muslim is not killed for the murder of a dhimmi whereas a dhimmi is killed for the murder of a Muslim. Bat Ye’or states:
The punishment that a guilty Muslim received for a crime would be greatly reduced if the victim were a dhimmi.
Again this is a false accusation. Punishments for crimes are applied equally to both Muslims and dhimmi with no distinction. The only distinction is that dhimmi will not be punished for those actions which are permitted for them such as drinking alcohol, whereas a Muslim would be.
The Prophet (saw) said, “The diyyah (blood money) of the Jews and Christians is like the Muslim’s diyyah.”
It is narrated in a hadith “that the Messenger of Allah (saw) killed a Muslim for a mu’ahid and said, ‘I am the most noble of those who fulfil their dhimmah’.”
This hadith clearly indicates that if a Muslim kills a mu’ahid he is punished with death. This equally applies to the killing of a dhimmi as discussed earlier.
Economy
The dhimmi enjoy the same economic benefits as Muslims. They can be employees, establish companies, be partners with Muslims and buy and sell goods. Their wealth is protected and if they are poor and unable to find work they are entitled to state benefits from the Khilafah’s Treasury (Bait ul-Mal).
Historically, many dhimmi prospered within the lands of the Khilafah.
Cecil Roth mentions that the treatment of the Jews at the hands of the Ottoman State attracted Jews from all over Western Europe. The land of Islam became the land of opportunity. Jewish physicians from the school of Salanca were employed in the service of the Sultan and the Viziers (ministers). In many places glass making and metalworking were Jewish monopolies, and with their knowledge of foreign languages, they were the greatest competitors of the Venetian traders.
The poor dhimmi will receive state benefits if they are in need.
‘Umar ibn al-Khattab once passed by an old dhimmi begging at doors, and said: “We have not done justice to you if we have taken jizya from you in the prime of your youth and neglected you in your old age.” He then ordered from the treasury what was suitable for him.
With regards taxation the shari’ah has put the condition of belief on some of the taxes, which means they are applied differently between the Muslims and dhimmi. Muslims for example are ordered to pay the Zakat but dhimmi are exempt, whereas dhimmi are ordered to pay the jizya (head tax) but Muslims are exempt.
Religion
A widespread accusation against the Khilafah is that Islam was spread by the sword forcing non-Muslims to convert to Islam or die. This claim in particular is used to create fear and opposition within western countries to the re-emergence of a Khilafah in the Muslim world.
Islam categorically forbids forcing anyone to convert to Islam.
Allah (swt) says:
"Let there be no compulsion in religion"
Thomas Arnold states:
The toleration extended towards the Christian Arabs by the victorious Muslims of the first century of the Hijrah and continued by succeeding generations, we may surely infer that those Christian tribes that did embrace Islam, did so of their own choice and free will.
Islam has also forbidden tempting non-Muslims away from their beliefs and worships.
The Messenger of Allah (saw) wrote to the people of Yemen: ‘Whoever is adamant upon Judaism or Christianity will not be tormented for it, and he is obliged to pay the jizya.’
The meaning of ‘will not be tormented for it’ means the dhimmi are left to follow their beliefs and worships.
Therefore dhimmi are allowed to follow their own beliefs, the rules of their religion and perform actions with although forbidden in Islam were permitted to them by the Messenger of Allah (saw) such as drinking alcohol, eating pork, marriage and divorce.
The dhimmi places of worship are also protected by the Khilafah. The existence of centuries old Churches, Synagogues and Temples throughout the Muslim world is clear evidence to this fact.
Since these areas are the only areas a religion such as Christianity, Judaism or Hinduism has detailed rules for, the dhimmi will generally face no conflicts between their religions and living within the Khilafah.
Conclusion
The dhimmi are citizens of the Khilafah and enjoy all the rights of citizenship such as protection, guaranteed living and fair treatment. They also enjoy the right of being treated with kindness, leniency, justice and clemency. They can join the Islamic armed forces and fight alongside the Muslims if they choose to do so, but they are not obliged to fight as the Muslims are. They are viewed by the ruler and the judge in the same light as the Muslims are viewed without any discrimination in terms of managing their affairs and when implementing the rules of transactions (mu’amilat) and the penal code (hudud) upon them.
Therefore, the dhimmi enjoys all the rights, equally and exactly as those enjoyed by the Muslims except those rights which are specific to them because of their belief or specific to Muslims because of their belief. They are in no way classed as second class citizens.
Here you can find the detailed version, it's an amazing work made by a muslims giving evidence from quran, hadith and historical exemples. Contrary to you who like to take source from nonsense antisharia and zionists psychopaths.
You must be registered for see links
Then i've read the otehr article that you posted. There is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.
-NO SOURCE
- NO HISTORIAN NAMES
- NO VERIFIABLE DATE
Only some historical persons that really existed which she put in her two cents with some dates that marked history ( to look serious).
Exemple, she quote Noel Barber, a British novelist of the 20th century who state that the turks sold woman on market. YOU HAVE TO KNOW THAT IN THIS PERIOD, THE BRITISH EMPIRE WAS MAKING WAR TO PALESTINIAN, EGYPTIANS AND OTTOMANS! So this unclean person was telling exactly the same crap as fox news about the islamist eater of children who rape and rape between prayers, brief propaganda.
In her article, she talk about the slave market in Istanbul, between the Nuruosmaniye Mosque and the Atik Ali Pasa Mosque that was in an area known as the Tavukpazari (Chicken Market).
Why did you think the Ottoman market was called "Chicken Market"? BECAUSE THEY were simply seilling fowl.
It's like the painting she put in the beginning. Who painted this scene? A witness of the scene who assisted the taking of "*** slaves" by Suleyman ? LOL...
No, by a well hidden western guy who imagined a shooting of fictive slaves.
In other words : your article is empty.
I just inquired about this journalist. I didn't see more zionist than her, she post on her facebook some articles about the "Mali Islamist " by providing CNN or TIME as source. No need to be a genius to understand that it's a western woman defending the western modele : Gay marriage = progress, abortion = progress, veil = submission .. well, i know the kind.
Furthermore, the journal where she posted this article (hurriyetdailynews) had as editor in chief (the one who choose if an article is published or not) David Judson. um ... it sounds not very Turkish stuff.
All of that is to say that It is clearly all a sham, that looks true because there is date and historical names ( in always impress me dates in an articles because it appears "serious") written by a truffle working for zionists anti-islam.
I'm not surprissed about where you're taking your sources.
At the end of the fifteenth century, the Ottoman Empire itself into haven for Jews expelled from Spain by the decree of the Alhambra promulgated by the Catholic Monarchs in 1492; many Ashkenazi Jews from Eastern Europe and Russia also took refuge in the Empire, where the status of the dhimma guarantee their safety in contrast to the persecution they may be elsewhere.François 1er and Louis XIV allied with the Ottomans against the Austrians and recognized a protective role on the Catholic population of the Ottoman Empire.Under Charles Quint, since 1521 they started the conquest Mexico and America.Then the french and english fought for the lands untill pushing amerindian to west then exterminating completly the amerindian.90% of Native American tribes have disappeared following the arrival of Europeans in North America.
The Ottoman system of slavery was quite different the European, in that the slaves were not used primarily for hard agricultural work. It was possible for them to rise to the highest positions in the state, for example to become vezirs.
The equivalent in the European system of slavery would be for a slave brought from Africa to become Prime Minister of Britain, which of course never happened.
Caliph Abu Bakr said "O people! I charge you with ten rules; learn them well! Stop, O people, that I may give you ten rules for your guidance in the battlefield. Do not commit treachery or deviate from the right path. You must not mutilate dead bodies. Neither kill a child, nor a woman, nor an aged man. Bring no harm to the trees, nor burn them with fire, especially those which are fruitful. Slay not any of the enemy's flock, save for your food. You are likely to pass by people who have devoted their lives to monastic services; leave them alone."
You obviousely didn't search anything, you only took what arrange you in order to justify your role of coward in the
most shameful army in the worl.
Having a military and being "civilized" doesn't imune you from the status of terrorist and it doesn't give you the right to invades, terrorize, bomb,steal, others countries and especially invent excuses and lies in order to invades them and kill millions of people then says "sorry we made a mistake, there was no weapons of mass destruction".
USA is noting more than greedy bullies who like to attack other nations, by planting blame on them and brain washing people. They invade other countries, raid homes, kill thousands of innocent unarmed familes and children, shoots at temple/mosques.They do all this, because the US is a greedy nation, they consume more than what they produce.Selling oil for gold like Saddam and Gadafi the US won't like this. It makes their US dollar and economy weak.Good reason to bombard and massacre your terrorist country.
The point is that US occupation of other nations is not in the best interest of US national security. US drone strikes kill civilians quite frequently, and traumatize the people of the affected nation. How would you feel if you saw foreign soldiers, maybe Chinese on US soil, would you not get mad at China? The US has killed millions of Iraqi Civilians. Is that not terrorizing to the people of Iraq? US interventionist foreign policy is detrimental to the national security of the US.
Terrorism: The use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.
Intimidation - US bases on foreign soil where everyone despises us, check.
Political aim - 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 6th, 7th, 8th, + 14th amendment violated, along with troops positioned strategically in an oil rich country.. CHECK!
You lose.
Now your videos, did you just watch or made more detailed research instead of jumping into conclusion and say they klill random people? Why would they kill random people? You have no elements about what's happening? I myself didn't know but after few research they did not kill random people but killed some criminal or related to Bachar that they followed with cars, they even ask his name at the end.I don't support the killing of people but saying that they kill random people is taking people for stupid.
I'm getting used to your lies, it's no different than CNN and Fox new, basically throws it's onw crap and accuse muslims.
US terrorists kill random peoples
US terrorists kill random peoples 2
You must be registered for see links
US terrorists kill an old man in cold blood
US terrorists Kill Sheep With A Baseball Bat WARNING GRAPHIC
US soldier kill puppy
Yes, apart bombing cities and steal these video shows what is your ideologies producted : i don't need your wall of text finding excuse and minimalize USA's faults.
Now about your Yezidis persecuted crap repeated by medias, here the kind of manipulation that is going on right now, the americano-zionists as usual was trying to fool us with lies.It's a lot of hypocrisis when USA percecuted also christians since in 2003 60% of the christians left Iraq because of their ideologies promotting massacre, stealing and destruction.
You must be registered for see images
On the left picture it's so called christians from Irak are chained by the bad jihadists.And on the right it's in fact the shia women who commemorates the batthe of Karbala.And these kind of picture and videos are everywhere in internet,all to make it us to bealieve a persecutions on Christians from iraq.
You are either not liked in France. I'm myself French and even during the 2nd world war when your country came in last moment when every country was weakened.They raped 3,500 french woman by American soldiers in France between June 1944 and the end of war. And many rape victims never reported the facts to the police. American troops involved had committed 208 rapes and murders thirty in the department of Manche. Just counting for the month of June 1944 in Normandy.You did the same in Irak and Afghanistan even in your own army you'll find thousands of rape report to woman soldiers.
You are not well placed to give lessons to muslims.Your country is at the first position in the race of rapes.
Even in your army you rape you own womens it's an other thing part of your history.
You must be registered for see links
Don't worry i understand your position, at this point, parotting lies was your only solution.
We can find similar in French so i didn't watch but it contradict the one you posted and looks a bit more honnest than the biased on you posted.
Please learn to be honnest, then return at a later date. Or never. Really doesn't bother me either way.
I'll just cut you off right there, since most of your post is an incoherent rant about how the whole world is evil and plotting against you.
You're not French. You're Muslim. I understand the difference well enough, little Jihadi.
Further, while some of your statements are not necessarily untrue - they come with certain... qualifying notes.
For example - while it was possible for -some- of the non-believers to become Vizirs - what must be understood about this is that they were castrated Eunuchs rendered unable to have children or an inheritance to bias their judgment - as the Muslim nobility would.
Of course - you don't mention that in the brochure.
Abu Dawud (14:2526) - The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Three things are the roots of faith: to refrain from (killing) a person who utters, "There is no god but Allah" and not to declare him unbeliever whatever sin he commits, and not to excommunicate him from Islam for his any action; and jihad will be performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal (Antichrist)
Quran (48:29) - "Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard (ruthless) against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves"
That's not in the brochure, either.
Of course, the ones who have to worry about it aren't the young, frustrated men who sign on to kill people/feel powerful and take *** slaves. IE - those who throw in with ISIS.
I'll just cut you off right there, since most of your post is an incoherent rant about how the whole world is evil and plotting against you.
You're not French. You're Muslim. I understand the difference well enough, little Jihadi.
Further, while some of your statements are not necessarily untrue - they come with certain... qualifying notes.
For example - while it was possible for -some- of the non-believers to become Vizirs - what must be understood about this is that they were castrated Eunuchs rendered unable to have children or an inheritance to bias their judgment - as the Muslim nobility would.
Of course - you don't mention that in the brochure.
Abu Dawud (14:2526) - The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Three things are the roots of faith: to refrain from (killing) a person who utters, "There is no god but Allah" and not to declare him unbeliever whatever sin he commits, and not to excommunicate him from Islam for his any action; and jihad will be performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal (Antichrist)
Quran (48:29) - "Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard (ruthless) against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves"
That's not in the brochure, either.
Of course, the ones who have to worry about it aren't the young, frustrated men who sign on to kill people/feel powerful and take *** slaves. IE - those who throw in with ISIS.
Ignoring facts is all you can do at this point, i didn't expect you to answer when i exposed your lies.
It's not an american or a zionist supporters of massacres who will tell me if i'm french or not. You know you have no case, so attack the person.The classic pattern I've grown so used to from you fanatics.
So your exemple with some particular muslims is the summary of what we should know about islam? Is that all what we had to understand about islam?
Castration is in no way authorized by the Koran nor Muslims, nor for their "potential" slaves as i already give you evidence about how they must be respected. Then saying that some muslims have practiced and Ottoman, i have no problem with that, muslims contain as every civilization, their blacksheep, perverts, thief ...
Muslims, especially those of the Ottoman empire, were not pioneers in this area, they were significantly outperformed by the popes of vatican that for their simple pleasure amused themselves to castrat pre pubescent kids so that they enjoy their voice.
Between 529 and 533, the Eastern Justinian published a full update of the Roman laws Emperor Justinian Code. Regulated in the various social statuses, slavery continues to have its place, but in the Christian context, the treatment of the slave is improved, and the postage is easy and recommended. Throughout the Middle Ages, Constantinople retains its market esclaves3. Despite the formal condemnation of the Church, the practice of castrating young slaves continues to be eunuchs.
The slave trade off the coast of the shipped to the American colonies and essentially practiced by Europeans from the sixteenth to the nineteenth century Africa.Worse, they could at any time be imposed on their slaves, if they just felt or simply too moody, horrific and various punishments: from whip to castration through mutilation. Thus, a slave could be cut two legs for fleeing work over his forces.
Look i'll do like you taking verses out of context :
If anyone, even your own family suggests worshipping another God, kill them. (Deuteronomy 13:6-10)
If you find out a city worships a different god, destroy the city and kill all of it's inhabitants... even the animals. (Deuteronomy 13:12-15)
You cut the end of the hadith and there is nothing wrong in this hadith, only for the one who doesn't know the meaning of jihad in islam learning what is jihad from CNN and fox news.
"The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Three things are the roots of faith: to refrain from (killing) a person who utters, "There is no god but Allah" and not to declare him unbeliever whatever sin he commits, and not to excommunicate him from Islam for his any action; and jihad will be performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal (Antichrist). The tyranny of any tyrant and the justice of any just (ruler) will not invalidate it. One must have faith in Divine decree."
I'm not even surprised about your lack of knowledge about islam when i see your sources antisharia, thereligionofpeace, zionists made documentary full of lies...
The fact that i'm exposing your lies is a Jihad, defending the oppressed and unable to practice their own will and freedom of choice is also a jihad, defend his homes against invaders and oppressors is a jihad.
If you thought that islam says that muslims must let their children being massacred by your army and stay opressed you are kidding yourself. You're doing your "jihad" and serve the interest of your government in his way of acting like a parasite.Don't come here giving us your justice of killing and destruction.
I know the kind of person you are, taking verses copy paste from your friends sites as always the verses are out of context or cut as the one you just posted :
Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah ; and those with him are forceful against the disbelievers, merciful among themselves. You see them bowing and prostrating [in prayer], seeking bounty from Allah and [His] pleasure. Their mark is on their faces from the trace of prostration. That is their description in the Torah. And their description in the Gospel is as a plant which produces its offshoots and strengthens them so they grow firm and stand upon their stalks, delighting the sowers - so that Allah may enrage by them the disbelievers. Allah has promised those who believe and do righteous deeds among them forgiveness and a great reward.
It's' in a battle situation, the disbelievers being referred to in these verses are the those who persecuted and attacked the Muslims.
Your bias and logic is the equivalent of a dog chasing its tail.
" Therefore when you meet in battle "
" Therefore when you meet in battle "
That was meant for people in battle (i.e who fight not those who are peaceful)
I don't know why you even post this
It has nothing with people killing people . This is god final judgment On people who don't believe.It's different from human killing another human .
Believers are not gods they don't have the right to kill unbelievers just because they doesn't believe (What ISIS is doing) god who judge them in the end not human.
And God forbidden muslims To kill peaceful people who doesn't attack them.
Again this is only meant for the idolaters who fight in battle not the peaceful idolaters. In order to understand a verse you need to read the one before and after!
This verse you posted was after verse 4 ,Which talked about a contract between the idolaters who fight in battle with the believers
The contract was a promise not attack each other for a period of time
"So when the sacred months have passed away" Means when the contract period is over .
Again this is meant for the people who fight in battle not the innocent ones who doesn't attack.
Its totally different from what ISIS do by killing people who didn't fight they just kill lives because they don't believe.
I swear You just copy and paste without knowing the story behind it .
This verse you posted was talking about "The bader battle"
That verse Was giving strategies and ways to fight in the battle
This is clearly was not meant for innocent*people and it was about certain group
The verse was about the story of the tired people who came to madina then the prophet let them stay and drink from the camel milk After they recovered
They stole the camels and killed the Patron .
Thats somewhat true
Quran surah's came out one by one on times of events .some of the things that were okay became forbidden later on like drinking sake ,marrying many women (in Aljahlia it used to be okay to Marry dozen of women before islam)
But again there isn't anything in Quran that tell people To kill innocent lives who does not fight you (believers or disbelievers)
Every verse you posted was talking about killing certain people who either fights in battles or attack .
This is a prediction before the end of the world
Its about a battle between some muslims and some jew (not all jew but some fighters)
Its not saying kill all jew ,but its talking about the prediction of that event
This is not Bukhari (8:387)
This is bukhai (8:387)
"Narrated Anas bin Malik: We used to pray with the Prophet and some of us used to place the ends of their clothes at the place of prostration because of scorching heat."
As you can see this hadith is totally different from the one you posted Hopefully you did not just get that from unreliable source .You know like facebook or something .
same as above
Either you mistook the numbers or changed the entire text
Or some google translation that changed the real meaning.
________
If the people of kufr (not muslim)were peaceful (not fighters) or muahed
its forbidden to kill them and not just kill but also may not attack his wealth and not on display, and there is no difference between the Christian and the Jewish and others in the correct, from the hadeeth of Abdullah bin AMR: the killer of promising(promising =peaceful non muslim) does not smell paradise that welcomes its fragrance is of 40 years. Narrated by Al-bukhaari and nesaee
عبد الله بن عمرو رضي الله عنهما قال: من قتل معاهداً لم يرح رائحة الجنة وإن ريحها توجد من ""مسيرة أربعين عاماً. رواه البخاري، وفي النسائي وغيره
others from the hadeeth of Abu Bakra said: the Messenger of Allah peace be upon him: "who kills a promising doesn't go to heaven."
من حديث أبي بكرة رضي الله عنه قال: قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم: من قتل معاهداً في ""غير كنهه حرم الله عليه الجنة"
