Yata's Mirror actually invincible?

[Rsth97]

Okay so I know in most itachi threads some people say that this makes him unbeatable. And many people say that madaras perfect susanoo sword can destroy it. But opinions aside and going by the manga isn't this false?

 

[ministerC4]

No, that's extreme wank.
Even if it was, Itachi wouldn't hold out for 2 minutes(literally). That Mirror can't stay up all day.
FTC soloes Yata Mirror.

 

[TRE MERCER]

Yes BZ stated it was remember he is the man who basically watched everything unroll and started everything in NV i doubt he'd be hyping it up for nothing.

 

[LuckyMan]

If you've seen it repel every attack that has ever been shown in the series then yes, it is invincible. If you have not seen that then its just hype.

 

[Rsth97]

If you've seen it repel every attack that has ever been shown in the series then yes, it is invincible. If you have not seen that then its just hype.

Well in the manga it stopped Sasuke's Kirin and some explosive tags but the. He died from illness/over use of MS

 

[Made in Heaven]

With hype as big as Yata's, some really impressive feats are required to validate it. Unfortunately, no such feats exist.

 

[naruto7861]

If you've seen it repel every attack that has ever been shown in the series then yes, it is invincible. If you have not seen that then its just hype.

Not a fanboy but you can't go against the manga fact

 

[Godplex]

I'm not a fanboy, but yes, it does repel every attack. It's weakness is that it doesn't cover the whole susano'o though, as well as the fact susano'o takes a lot of chakra to maintain.

 

[Swagdara Uchiha]

I wouldn't particularly call in invincible since we haven't seen anything that causes a grand scale of destruction used against it (Ex. TBB, PS Sword)

 

[Migster257]

Get's one-shotted by Kakashi's thousand years of death.

 

[lanakui8]

Nothing in the narutoverse is literally invincible.

Well in the manga it stopped Sasuke's Kirin and some explosive tags but the. He died from illness/over use of MS

Kirin destroyed whatever susanoo itachi was using and slightly damaged itachi as well. If Yaata was invincible, none of that would have happened, it would have no-sold kirin.

 

[LuckyMan]

Not a fanboy but you can't go against the manga fact

Its also a manga fact that Kakashi Lightning Blade will cut through anything. Do you believe that?

 

[LustyLover]

Its also a manga fact that Kakashi Lightning Blade will cut through anything. Do you believe that?

That's been disproved though. The YM hasn't.

Plus, in all honesty, don't you think a mystical weapon without a physical form that Kaguya's son vouched for would be a little more believable than a Raiton technique formed by a Jounin?

 

[naruto7861]

Its also a manga fact that Kakashi Lightning Blade will cut through anything. Do you believe that?

there's a difference the all knowing Zetsu said that

 

[LuckyMan]

there's a difference the all knowing Zetsu said that

Makes no difference. It was stated in the manga, thus a manga fact.

 

[lanakui8]

That's been disproved though. The YM hasn't.

which means that no manga statement that attributes no limits to something should be taken as literally true. YM just hasn't had the opportunity to be disproved since kishi has put it against extremely weak attacks.

Plus, in all honesty, don't you think a mystical weapon without a physical form that Kaguya's son vouched for would be a little more believable than a Raiton technique formed by a Jounin?

That's not the point, the point is that the manga has given tons of these hyperbole statements that attribute limitless power to things. BZ at that time didn't even know what susanoo was and stated itachi was completely invincible. Unless you believe that itachi was literally completely invincible in that people that no conceivable power can defeat him, then it's hyperbole just like YM.

YM's hype has also already been disproved when it failed to reflect the yamata orochi's charge attack.

there's a difference the all knowing Zetsu said that

you mean the same zetsu that's being constantly duped by part 1 level Naruto trickery?

 

[LustyLover]

^Not talking to you. Allow for him to speak for himself.

 

[lanakui8]

^Not talking to you. Allow for him to speak for himself.

what is the goal of this thread? To find the answer to the OP, or to give a better argument than another person?

 

[LustyLover]

what is the goal of this thread? To find the answer to the OP, or to give a better argument than another person?

I wasn't addressing you because I was specifically interested as to what InvisibleMan's answer would be. I could find the answer to this thread in his response.

 

[TrollingSage]

That's been disproved though. The YM hasn't.

Plus, in all honesty, don't you think a mystical weapon without a physical form that Kaguya's son vouched for would be a little more believable than a Raiton technique formed by a Jounin?

I don't remember Kakashi's Raikiri failing to cut something