Seriously? So 18 and possibly more years of raising the child doesn't matter? If the father can go through that, then the woman has no excuse as to why she can't go through 9 months of labor other than selfishness(barring financial issues of course). SMH at people who act like the father won't be affected as well by the child's birth. If the woman truly has nothing to do with the child, he will be affected far more.
1. That's a horrible comparison. For one, dying from pregnancy happens far less than living through pregnancy, so it is no way like running into a burning building. Secondly, a prized teddy bear can be easily replaced and forgotten. If human life is comparable to a teddy bear to you, then you have no ****ing idea what the true value of life is at all.
It's an analogy for a reason.
Because it happens less, we should ignore the minority, no? Let's just forget about the women who do actually die from pregnancy. The father's desire is what matters most, right?
Male domination never fails to amaze me. Lol
If you're willing to take risks like that and make a woman who doesn't think the same as you go through things like that then maybe you're more inhumane than I am.
2. Is it not selfish to deny the man the right to have his child?
Sure, but the woman has more of a right since she's the one doing the physical work. And yes, the physical work matters more than some dude who can't stop *****ing about how he can't get what he wants. Boo hoo.
I'd be happy to help women break a law like the one mentioned in the OP. Women aren't cattle.
It is just as much his child as it hers.
All he has to do is get a nut and then worry about everything else after the woman finishes going through body ****ery. Even then, it's not definite that the man can even care for the child successfully. Of course, I won't ignore the
minority because I'm not that much of a douche. Let's say the guy successfully raises the child on his own. Why do we have to ignore the woman's desires, even if they're "selfish"? Your argument shows that the world doesn't run on morality, if anything, and that mentality can go for either side of the argument.
"Is it not selfish to deprive the child of life because of what one person wants?"
Is it not selfish to treat a woman like she's a cow for your whims because your condom broke (if you even used one) or you didn't pull out in time or whatever? Why does she have to succumb to your whims and suffer for you? Isn't that just as cruel as not wanting to have the baby?
Hope that girl really loves you, homes.
What about the emotional pain the man will go through because his child was taken from him without any regard for what he wanted?
The woman's emotions matter more unless the dad transfers the baby into his stomach somehow and has to go through pregnancy and birth. Yeah, I mean what I just typed up too. Not that there's really a hierarchy for emotions, but adding everything up makes the father's desire less important.
Let's get a woman pregnant. She doesn't want the baby, but you do.
Trying to do something like the OP stated is basically saying
"***** **** your body, I'm worried about that little body you're supposed to be pushing into my arms. **** you. Let me have this."
The 18 years the man goes through raising the child easily nullifies the 9 months of labor,
How so? You're creating a hierarchy here. A man doesn't have to go through even half the pain a woman does in those 18 years unless he somehow has to get his ass beat for money or some shit.
in all fairness, it's a non-factor because the mother just goes through 9 months of pain while the man will either go through 18 years of responsibility for another life or will have to live forever with the pain of not having the child he wanted.
Have you ever watched The Cosby Show?
